A Comparison of Different Teaching Designs of ‘Acids and Bases’ Subject
Full Text (PDF)
More Detail
1 Giresun University, Faculty of Education, Department of Elementary Education, 28200 Giresun/TURKEY2 Primary Teacher Education, Karadeniz Technical University* Corresponding Author
Abstract
Background:
Inability to link the acid-base concepts with daily life phenomena (as contexts) highlights the need for further research on the context-based acid-base chemistry. In this vein, the aim of this study is to investigate the effects of different teaching designs (REACT strategy, 5Es learning model and traditional (existing) instruction) relevant with ‘acids and bases’ subject on pre-service science teachers’ conceptions and attitudes towards chemistry and to compare them with each other.
Materials and methods:
Within quasi-experimental research design, the sample comprised of 95 pre-service science teachers from Faculty of Education in Giresun University, Turkey. Three intact groups were randomly assigned as either experimental and control groups. To gather data, Acid-Base Chemistry Concept Test (ABCCT), Chemistry Attitudes and Experiences Questionnaire (CAEQ) and clinical interviews were used.
Results:
The results denote that REACT strategy is effective in helping the pre-service science teachers retain their gained conceptions in long-term memory whilst 5Es learning model is efficient in achieving conceptual learning.
Conclusions:
Finally, future studies should test the effects of REACT strategy and 5Es learning model on different variables (i.e. sample, subject, scientific process skills, scientific inquiry) over a longer period of time (i.e. one semester or one-year).
License
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Article Type: Research Article
EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed, 2016, Volume 12, Issue 1, 57-86
https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1422a
Publication date: 09 Nov 2015
Article Views: 5283
Article Downloads: 4829
Open Access References How to cite this articleReferences
- Abraham, M. R., Gryzybowski, E. B., Renner, J. W., & Marek, A. E. (1992). Understanding and misunderstanding of eighth graders of five chemistry concepts found in textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 105-120.
- Banerjee, A. C. (1991). Misconceptions of students and teachers in chemical equilibrium. International Journal of Science Education, 13(4), 487-494.
- Barker, V., & Millar, R. (1999). Students’ reasoning about chemical reactions: What changes occur during a context-based post-16 chemistry course? International Journal of Science Education, 21(6), 645-665.
- Barker, V., & Millar, R. (2000). Students’ reasoning about basic chemical thermodynamics and chemical bonding: What changes occur during a context-based post-16 chemistry course? International Journal of Science Education, 22(11), 1171- 1200.
- Bennett, J., & Lubben, F. (2006). Context-based chemistry: The salters approach. International Journal of Science Education, 28(9), 999-1015.
- Berns, R. G., & Erickson, P. M. (2001). Contextual teaching and learning: Preparing students for the new economy. The Highlight Zone Research Work, 5, 1-8.
- Bilgin, İ. & Yahşi, D. (2006). Farklı laboratuvar yaklaşımlarının ilköğretim 8.sınıf öğrencilerinin asit-baz konularındaki kavramları anlamalarına etkisinin incelenmesi (Investigating the effects of various laboratory approaches on grade 8 students’ conceptions of acid-base concepts). Paper presented at Seventh National Science and Mathematics Education Congress, Gazi University, September 7-9, Ankara (In Turkish).
- Bodner, G.M. (1990). Why good teaching fails and hard-working students don’t always succeed. Spectrum, 28(1), 27-32.
- Botton, C. (1995). Collaborative concept mapping and formative assessment key stage 3: Understandings of acids and bases. School Science Review, 77, 124-130.
- Bozkurt, O., Aydın, H., Yaman, S., Uşak, M., & Gezer, K. (2005). Sixth, seventh and eighth year students’ knowledge levels about greenhouse effect, ozone layer and acid rain. Mediterranean Journal of Educational Sciences, 10(2), 81-95.
- Bradley, J. D., & Mosimege, M. D. (1998). Alternative conceptions in acids and bases: A comparative study of student teachers with different chemistry backgrounds. South African Journal of Chemistry, 51, 137-147.
- Bulte, A. M. W., Westbroek, H. B., de Jong, O., & Pilot, A. (2006). A research approach to designing chemistry education using authentic practices as contexts. International Journal of Science Education, 28(9), 1063-1086.
- Burhan, Y. (2008). Asit ve baz kavramlarına yönelik karikatür destekli çalışma yapraklarının geliştirilmesi ve uygulanması (Developing worksheets enriched by concept cartoons concerning the acid-base concepts). Unpublished Master Thesis, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey (In Turkish).
- Bybee, R. W. (2003). Why the seven E’s. http://www.miamisci.org/ph/lpintro7e.html
- Bybee, R. W., Taylor, J. A., Gardner, A., van Scotter, P., Powell, J. C., Westbrook, A., & Landes, N. (2006). The BSCS 5E instructional model: Origins and effectiveness. A Report Prepared for the Office of the Science Education National Institutes of Health http://science.education.nih.gov/houseofreps.nsf/b82d55fa138783c2852572c9004f5 5 66/$FILE/Appendix%20D.pdf
- Carr, M. (1984). Model confusion in chemistry. Research in Science Education, 14, 97-103.
- Cho, J. (2002). The development of an alternative in-service programme for Korean science teachers with an emphasis on science-technology-society. International Journal of Science Education, 24(10), 1021-1035.
- Cleghorn, A., Shumba, O. & Peacock, A. (2002). Education students’ views towards science for children: Canada, Zimbabwe, England comparisons. World Studies in Education, 3(2), 103-118.
- Cobern, W.W. (1996). Worldview theory and conceptual change in science education. Science Education, 80(5), 579-610.
- CORD, (1999). Teaching science contextually. CORD Communications, Inc., Waco, Texas, USA.
- Cokelez, A. & Dumon, A. (2009). A comparative study of French and Turkish students’ ideas on acid-base. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1, 536-537.
- Crawford, M. L. (2001). Teaching contextually: Research, rationale, and techniques for improving student motivation and achievement in mathematics and science. CCI Publishing, Waco, Texas, USA.
- Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods, approaches (2nd Ed.). Sage Publications, United States of America.
- Çalık, M. (2013). Effect of technology-embedded scientific inquiry on senior science student teachers’ academic self-efficacy. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 9(3), 223-232.
- Çalık, M. & Ayas, A. (2005). A comparison of level of understanding of grade 8 students and science student teachers related to selected chemistry concepts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(6), 638-667
- Çalık, M. & Aytar, A. (2013). Investigating prospective primary teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge of “effect of human on environment” subject in the process of teaching practice. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 13(3), 1579-1605
- Çalik, M. & Coll, R.K. (2012). Investigating socioscientific issues via scientific habits of mind: Development and validation of the scientific habits of mind survey (SHOMS). International Journal of Science Education, 34(12), 1909-1930.
- Çalık, M. (2005). A cross-age study of different perspectives in solution chemistry from junior to senior high school. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3, 671–696
- Çalik, M., Özsevgeç, T., Ebenezer, J., Artun, H. & Küçük, Z. (2014). Effects of 'environmental chemistry' elective course via technology embedded scientific ınquiry model on some variables. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(3), 412-430.
- Çalık, M., Turan, B. & Coll, R.K. (2014). A cross-age study of elementary student teachers' scientific habits of mind concerning socioscientific issues. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(6), 1315-1340
- Çalik, M., Ebenezer, J., Özsevgeç, T., Küçük, Z. & Artun, H. (2015). Improving science student teachers' self-perceptions of fluency with innovative technologies and scientific inquiry abilities. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(4), 448-460. doi: 10.1007/s10956-014-9529-1
- Çalık, M., Ültay, N., Kolomuç, A. & Aytar, A. (2015). A cross-age study of science student teachers' chemistry attitudes. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice, 16(2), 228- 236 doi: 10.1039/c4rp00133h
- Çetingul, P. I., & Geban, O. (2005). Understanding acid-base concept by using conceptual change approach. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 29, 69-74.
- Dalgety, J., Coll, R. K., & Jones, A. (2003). Development of chemistry attitudes and experiences questioannaire (CAEQ). Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(7), 649-668.
- Demircioğlu, G. (2003). Lise II asitler ve bazlar ünitesi ile ilgili rehber materyal geliştirilmesi ve uygulanması (Developing and implementing teacher guide materials related to the unit “acids and bases” at lycee-II). Unpubslihed PhD Thesis, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey (In Turkish).
- Demircioğlu, H., Demircioğlu, G., & Çalık, M. (2009). Investigating effectiveness of storylines embedded within context based approach: A case for the periodic table. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 10(3), 241-249.
- Demircioğlu, H., Dinç, M. & Çalık, M. (2013). The effect of storylines embedded within context-based learning approach on grade 6 students’ understanding of ‘physical and chemical change’ concepts. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 12(5), 682-691.
- Demircioğlu, G., Özmen, H. & Ayas, A. (2004). Asit ve baz kavramları üzerine bir araştırma çerçevesinde kimyada karşılaşılan kavram yanılgıları (A research on misconceptions of acid-base concepts). Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 4(1), 57-80 (In Turkish).
- Demircioğlu, H., Vural, S., & Demircioğlu, G. (2012). The effect of a teaching material developed based on “REACT” strategy on gifted students’ achievement. Journal of Ondokuz Mayıs University Faculty of Education, 31(2), 101-144 (In Turkish).
- Drechsler, M., & Driel, V. J. (2008). Experienced teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge of teaching acid-base chemistry. Research in Science Education, 38(5), 611-631.
- Driel, V. J. H. (2005). The conceptions of chemistry teachers about teaching and learning in the context of a curriculum innovation. International Journal of Science Education, 27(3), 303-322.
- Driver, R. (1981). Pupils’ alternative frameworks in science. European Journal of Science Education, 3, 93-101.
- Eisenkraft, A. (2003). Expanding the 5E model. The Science Teacher, September, 56-59.
- Ekmekçioğlu, E. (2007). Ortaöğretim kimya dersinde asit baz konusunun anlamlı öğrenme kuramı ve kavram haritası ile öğretiminin başarıya etkisi (The effect of meaningful learning theory and teaching with concept map to achievement of acid-base topic in chemistry lessons at high schools). Unpublished Master Thesis, Selçuk University, Konya, Turkey (In Turkish).
- Er Nas, S., Coruhlu, T. S. & Cepni, S. (2010). An assessment on the effectiveness of the material developed for the elaborate stage of the 5E model. Journal of Ondokuz Mayıs University Faculty of Education, 29(1), 17-36 (In Turkish).
- Erduran, S. (2003). Examining the mismatch between pupil and teacher knowledge in acidbase chemistry. School Science Review, 84(308), 81-87.
- Feng, S. L., & Tuan, H. L. (2005). Using ARCS model to promote 11th graders’ motivation and achievement in learning about acids and bases. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3(3), 463-484.
- Furió-Más, C., Calatayud, M. L., Jenaro Guisasola, J., & Furió-Gómez, C. (2005). How are the concepts and theories of acid–base reactions presented? Chemistry in textbooks and as presented by teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 27(11), 1337-1358.
- Garnett, P. J., & Tobin, K. (1988). Teaching for understanding: Exemplary practices in high school chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 26, 1-14.
- Geban, Ö., Ertepınar, H., Yılmaz, G., Altan, A. & Tahpaz, F. (1994). Bilgisayar destekli eğitimin öğrencilerin fen başarılarına ve fen bilgisi ilgilerine etkisi (Effects of computer aided instruction on students’ science achievement and interests towards science). Paper presented at First National Symposium of Science Education, Dokuz Eylul University, İzmir, Turkey (In Turkish).
- Geban, Ö., Taşdelen, U. & Kırbulut, Z. D. (2006). Kavramsal değişim yaklaşıma dayalı ortak grup çalışmalarının asit-baz kavramlarını anlamaya etkisi. (The effect of cooperative group works based on conceptual change approach on understanding of acid-base concepts). Paper presented at Seventh National Science and Mathematics Education Congress, Gazi University, September 7-9, Ankara (In Turkish).
- Gerber, B. L., Cavallo, A. M. L., & Marek, E. A. (2001). Relationship among informal learning environments, teaching procedures, and scientific reasoning abilities. International Journal of Science Education, 23(5), 535-549.
- Gilbert, J. K. (2006). On the nature of “context” in chemical education. International Journal of Science Education, 28(9), 957-976.
- Gilbert, J. K., Osborne, J. R. ve Fensham, P. J. (1982). Children’s Science and Its Consequences for Teaching. Science Education, 66(4), 623-633.
- Glynn, S. M., & T. R. Koballa, Jr. (2005). The contextual teaching and learning instructional approach, exemplary science: Best practices in professional development. In R. E. Yager (ed.) (pp 75-84). NSTA press, Arlington, VA, USA.
- Gokcek, N. (2007). İlköğretim 8. sınıf öğrencilerinin asit baz konusundaki başarılarına çoklu zeka kuramının etkisinin araştırılması (The effect of the multiple intelligences theory on grade-8 students` achievement in the topic of acid and base) (Unpublished master thesis). Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey (In Turkish).
- Graber, W., Erdmann, T., & Schlieker, V. (2002). ParCIS: Partnership between chemical industry and schools. Paper presented at the 2nd International IPN – YSEG Symposium, Kiel, Germany.
- Guzzetti, B. J., Williams, W. O., Skeels, S. A., & Wu, S. M. (1997). Influence of text structure on learning counterintuitive physics concepts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(7), 701-719.
- Hair, J. F. Jr., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Prentice-Hall International, New Jersey, USA.
- Hand, B. (1989). Student understandings of acids and bases: a two year study. Research in Science Education, 19(1), 133-144.
- Hazer, B. (1995). Genel kimya (General chemistry) (Third Edition). Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi Basımevi, Trabzon, Turkey (In Turkish).
- Hofstein, A., & Kesner, M. (2006). Industrial chemistry and school chemistry: Making chemistry studies more relevant. International Journal of Science Education, 28(9), 1017-1039.
- Kala, N., Yaman, F., & Ayas, A. (2013). The effectiveness of predict–observe–explain technique in probing students’ understanding about acid–base chemistry: A case for the concepts of pH, pOH, and strength. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11, 555-574.
- Karslı, F. & Çalık, M. (2012). Can freshman science student teachers’ alternative conceptions of ‘electrochemical cells’ be fully diminished? Asian Journal of Chemistry, 24(2), 485- 491.
- Kılavuz, Y. (2005). The effects of 5E learning cycle model based on constructivist theory on tenth grade students’ understanding of acid-base concepts (Unpublished master thesis). Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey.
- King, D. (2012). New perspectives on context-based chemistry education: Using a dialectical sociocultural approach to view teaching and learning. Studies in Science Education, 48(1), 51-87.
- Kıyıcı, G. & Yumuşak, A. (2005). Fen bilgisi laboratuarı dersinde bilgisayar destekli etkinliklerin öğrenci kazanımları üzerine etkisi: Asit-baz kavramları ve titrasyon konusu örneği (The effects of computer assisted activity at science laboratory lesson on student's acquiry; example of acid – base concept's and titration topic). The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 4(4), 130-134 (In Turkish).
- Kolomuç, A. & Çalık, M. (2012). A comparison of chemistry teachers’ and grade 11 students’ alternative conceptions of ‘rate of reaction’, Journal of Baltic Science Education, 11(4), 333-346.
- Kurnaz, M. A., & Çalık, M. (2008). Using different conceptual change methods embedded within 5E model: A sample teaching for heat and temperature. Journal of Physics Teacher Education Online, 5(1), 3-10.
- Lakatos, I. (1970). Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. Cited by: Lakatos, I. ve Musgrave, A. (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
- Marks, R., Bertram, S., & Eilks, I. (2008). Learning chemistry and beyond with a lesson plan onpotato crisps, which follows a socio-critical and problem-oriented approach to chemistry lessons – a case study. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 9, 267- 276.
- Merriam, S.B. (1988). Case study research in education. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, USA.
- Morgil, İ., Yavuz, S., Oskay, Ö. Ö. & Arda, S. (2005). Traditional and computer-assisted learning in teaching acids and bases. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 6(1), 52-63.
- Nakhleh M. B., & Krajcik J. S. (1994). Influence of levels of information as presented by different technologies on students understanding of acid, base, and pH concepts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(10), 1077-1096.
- Novak, D. J. (1988). Learning science and the science of learning. Studies in Science Education, 15(1), 77-101.
- Outertatani, L., Dumon, A., Trabelsi, M. A. & Soudani, M. (2007). Acids and bases: The appropriation of the Arrhenius model by Tunisian grade 10 students. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5, 483-506.
- Oversby, J. (2000). Is it a weak acid or a weakly acidic solution? School Science Review, 81(297), 89-91.
- Özmen, H. (2003). Kimya öğretmen adaylarinin asit ve baz kavramlariyla ilgili bilgilerini günlük olaylarla ilişkilendirebilme düzeyleri (Chemistry student teachers’ levels of linking their knowledge with daily life about acid and base concepts). Journal of Kastamonu Faculty of Education, 11(2), 317-324 (In Turkish).
- Özmen, H., Demircioğlu, G., Burhan, Y., Naseriazar, A. & Demircioğlu, H. (2012). Using laboratory activities enhanced with concept cartoons to support progression in students’ understanding of acid-base concepts. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 13(1), Article 8.
- Özmen, H., Demircioğlu, G., & Coll, R. K. (2009). A comparative study of the effects of a concept mapping enhanced laboratory experience on Turkish high school students’ understanding of acid-base chemistry. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(1), 1-24.
- Özmen, H. & Yıldırım, N. (2005). Çalışma yapraklarının öğrenci başarısına etkisi: Asit ve bazlar örneği (The effect of worksheet on student achievement: A case of acids-bases). Türk Fen Eğitimi Dergisi, 2(2), 124-143 (In Turkish).
- Özsevgeç, T. (2007). İlköğretim 5. sınıf kuvvet ve hareket ünitesine yönelik 5E modeline göre geliştirilen rehber materyallerin etkililiklerinin belirlenmesi (Determining effectiveness of guided materials about force and motion unit based on the 5E model for elementary students) (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey (In Turkish).
- Pabuccu, A. (2008). Improving 11th grade students' understanding of acid-base concepts by using 5E learning cycle model (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Middle East Technical University, Ankara.
- Parchmann, I., Gräsel, C., Baer, A., Nentwig, P., Demuth, R., Ralled, B., & the ChiK Project Group. (2006). “Chemie im kontext”: A symbiotic ımplementation of a context-based teaching and learning approach. International Journal of Science Education, 28(9), 1041- 1062.
- Petrucci, R. H. (1989). General chemistry principles and modern applications (Fifth Edition). Macmillan Publishing Company, New Jersey, USA.
- Pfundt, H., & Duit, R. (2000). Bibliography: Student’s alternative frameworks and science education (5th ed.). University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
- Pinarbasi, T., Sozbilir, M. & Canpolat, N. (2009). Prospective chemistry teachers’ misconceptions about colligative properties: boiling point elevation and freezing point depression. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice, 10, 273–280
- Ross, B., & Munby, H. (1991). Concept mapping and misconceptions: A study of high-school students' understandings of acids and bases. International Journal of Science Education, 13(1), 11-23.
- Saka, A. Z. (2011). Investigation of student-centered teaching applications of physics student teachers. Eurasian Journal of Physics and Chemistry Education, Special Issue, 51-58.
- Schwartz, A. T. (2006). Contextualized chemistry education: The American experience. International Journal of Science Education, 28(9), 977–998.
- Sisovic, D., & Bojovic, S. (2000). Approaching the concepts of acids and bases by cooperative learning. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice, 1(2), 263-275.
- Souders, J. (1999, July 9). Contextually based learning: Fad or proven practice. American Youth Policy Forum, Capitol Hill, Washington DC, USA.
- Stolk, M. J., Bulte, A. M. W., de Jong, O., & Pilot, A. (2009a). Towards a framework for a professional development programme: Empowering teachers for context-based chemistry education. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice, 10(2), 164-175.
- Stolk, M. J., Bulte, A. M. W., de Jong, O., & Pilot, A. (2009b). Strategies for a professional development programme: Empowering teachers for context-based chemistry education. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice, 10(2), 154–163.
- Sunger, M. (2007). An analysıs of efficacy beliefs, epistemology beiefs and attitudes towards science in preservice elementary science teachers and secondary science teachers (Unpublished master thesis). Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey.
- Sutman, F., & Bruce, M. (1992). Chemistry in the community – chemcom. Journal of Chemical Education, 69(7), 564–567.
- Tamer, P. İ. (2006). Effect of conceptual change texts accompanied with analogies on promoting conceptual change in acid and base concepts. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Middle East Technical University, Ankara.
- Toplis, R. (1998). Ideas about acids and alkalis. School Science Review, 80(291), 67-70.
- Üce, M., & Sarıçayır, H. (2002). Üniversite 1. sınıf genel kimya dersinde asit-baz konusunun öğretiminde kavramsal değişim metinleri ve kavram haritalarının kullanılması (Using conceptual changing test and concept maps to teach the subject of acid bases in general chemistry course for freshmen classes). Marmara University Atatürk Faculty of Education Journal of Educational Sciences, 16, 163-170 (In Turkish).
- Ültay, N., & Çalık, M. (2011a). Asitler ve bazlar konusu ile ilgili örnekler üzerinden 5E modelini ve REACT stratejisini ayırt etmek (Distinguishing 5E model from REACT strategy: An example of ‘acids and bases’ topic). Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5(2), 199-220 (In Turkish).
- Ültay, N., & Çalık, M. (2011b). Kimya tutum ve deneyimleri anketinin türkçeye uyarlanması (Adaptation of chemistry attitude and experiences questionnaire into Turkish). Paper presented at Second National Chemistry Education Symposium, July 5-8, Atatürk University, Erzurum (In Turkish).
- Ültay, N., & Çalık, M. (2012). A thematic review of studies into the effectiveness of contextbased chemistry curricula. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21(6), 686-701.
- Ültay, N., Durukan, Ü.G. & Ültay, E. (2015). Evaluation of the effectiveness of conceptual change texts in the REACT strategy. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice, 16(1), 22-38.
- Wilson, J. M. (1998). Differences in knowledge networks about acids and bases of year-12, undergraduate and postgraduate chemistry students. Research in Science Education, 28(4), 429-446.
- Yager R. E., & Weld J. D. (1999). Scope, sequence and co-ordination: The Iowa project, a national reform effort in the USA. International Journal of Science Education, 21(2), 169- 194.
- Yaman, F., Demircioğlu, G. & Ayas, A. (2006). Yapılandırmacı öğrenme kuramına dayalı geliştirilen etkinliklerin öğrencilerin asit ve baz kavramlarını anlamaları üzerine etkileri (The efffect of activities developed in regard to constructivist learning theory on students’ conceptions of acid-base concepts). Paper presented at Seventh National Science and Mathematics Education Congress, Gazi University, September 7-9, Ankara (In Turkish).
- Yıldız, V. G., Yıldırım, A. & İlhan, N. (2006). Üniversite kimya öğrencilerinin asitler ve bazlar hakkındaki bilgilerini günlük hayatla ilişkilendirebilme düzeyleri (Chemistry student teachers’ levels of linking their knowledge with daily life about acid and base concepts). Paper presented at Seventh National Science and Mathematics Education Congress, Gazi University, September 7-9, Ankara (In Turkish)
- Yin, R.K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
- Zhang, L. (2014). A meta-analysis method to advance design of technology-based learning tool: Combining qualitative and quantitative research to understand learning in relation to different technology features. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(1), 145-159.
How to cite this article
APA
Ültay, N., & Calik, M. (2016). A Comparison of Different Teaching Designs of ‘Acids and Bases’ Subject. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(1), 57-86. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1422a
Vancouver
Ültay N, Calik M. A Comparison of Different Teaching Designs of ‘Acids and Bases’ Subject. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2016;12(1):57-86. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1422a
AMA
Ültay N, Calik M. A Comparison of Different Teaching Designs of ‘Acids and Bases’ Subject. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2016;12(1), 57-86. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1422a
Chicago
Ültay, Neslihan, and Muammer Calik. "A Comparison of Different Teaching Designs of ‘Acids and Bases’ Subject". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2016 12 no. 1 (2016): 57-86. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1422a
Harvard
Ültay, N., and Calik, M. (2016). A Comparison of Different Teaching Designs of ‘Acids and Bases’ Subject. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(1), pp. 57-86. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1422a
MLA
Ültay, Neslihan et al. "A Comparison of Different Teaching Designs of ‘Acids and Bases’ Subject". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 12, no. 1, 2016, pp. 57-86. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1422a