A Conversation with
Michael R. Matthews:
The Contribution of History and
Philosophy of Science to Science
Teaching and Research

Yalçın Yalaki; Gültekin Çakmakcı

doi:10.12973/ejmste/75250

A Conversation with Michael R. Matthews: The Contribution of History and Philosophy of Science to Science Teaching and Research

Full Text (PDF)

Yalçın Yalaki ¹, Gültekin Çakmakcı ¹ ^*

More Detail

¹ Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Ankara, TURKEY^* Corresponding Author

Abstract

The following conversation with Michael R. Matthews took place in May and June of 2010 via e-mail after his visit to Istanbul and Ankara for giving seminars on “The Contribution of History and Philosophy of Science to Science Teaching and Research” at Bogazici University and Hacettepe University. Our conversation included topics such as Michael’s educational background, science teacher education in relation to history and philosophy of science, worldviews, nature of science, constructivism, possible future directions for research, and advices for junior scholars and doctoral students. We believe that Michael’s generous answers to our questions will be of interest to all science education researchers around the world.

Keywords

history and philosophy of science
worldviews
nature of science
features of science
constructivism
science teacher education

Supplementary Files

Conversation Audio (Part 1)
Conversation Audio (Part 2)

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Interview

EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed, 2010, Volume 6, Issue 4, 287-309

https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75250

Publication date: 22 Dec 2010

Article Views: 1935

Article Downloads: 1786

Open Access References How to cite this article

References

American Association for the Advancement of Science (1989). Project 2061: Science for All Americans. Washington, DC: AAAS
Adler, M. J. (1939/1988). Reforming Education. In G. van Doren (Ed.), New York: Macmillan.
Ariew, R. & Barker, P. (Eds.). (1996). Pierre Duhem: Essays in the History and Philosophy of Science. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.
Bell, B. F. (1986). The Form 1-5 Science Review - Effecting Change, New Zealand Science Teacher, 48, 6-9.
Bunge, M. (1999). The Sociology-Philosophy Connection. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Coelho, R. L. (2007). The Law of Inertia: How Understanding its History can Improve Physics Teaching, Science & Education, 16(9-10), 955-974.
Collingwood, R. G. (1945). The Idea of Nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Daston, L. & Galison, P. (2008) Objectivity. Brooklyn NY: Zone Books.
Dearden, R. F. (1967). Instruction and Learning by Discovery. In R. S. Peters (Ed.), The Concept of Education, (pp. 135-155). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Dewey, J. (1910). Science as Subject-Matter and as Method. Science, 31, 121-127. Reproduced in Science & Education, 1995, 4(4), 391-398.
Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and Education. New York: Macmillan Company.
Dijksterhuis, E. J. (1961/1986). The Mechanization of the World Picture. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
Duit, R. (1993). Research on Students' Conceptions: Developments and Trends. Paper presented at the Third International Conference on Misconceptions in Science and Mathematics Learning, New York, NY.
Fensham, P. J. (1992). Science and Technology. In P.W. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Curriculum (pp. 789-829). New York: Macmillan.
Fensham, P. J. (2004) Defining an Identity: The Evolution of Science Education as a Field of Research. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Fensham, P. J., Gunstone, R., & White, R. (Eds.). (1994). The Content of Science: A Constructivist Approach to its Teaching and Learning. London: Falmer Press.
Ferris, T. (2010). The Science of Liberty: Democracy, Reason, and the Laws of Nature. New York: Harper-Collins.
Feyerabend, P. K. (1970). Consolations for the Specialist. In I. Lakatos & A. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge (pp. 197-230). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Feyerabend, P. K. (1975). Against Method. London: New Left Books.
Fishman, Y. I. (2009). Can Science Test Supernatural Worldviews?, Science & Education, 18(6-7), 813-837.
Flick, L. B. & Lederman, N. G. (Eds.). (2004). Scientific Inquiry and Nature of Science: Implications for Teaching, Learning and Teacher Education. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Fraassen, B. C. van (1980). The Scientific Image. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Galileo, G. (1623/1957). The Assayer. In S. Drake (Ed.), Discoveries and Opinions of Galileo (pp. 229-280). New York: Doubleday.
Galileo, G. (1633/1953). Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems (S. Drake Trans.), Berkeley: University of California Press. (Second revised edition, 1967)
Gaukdroger, S. (1980). Descartes’ Project for a Mathematical Physics. In S. Gaukroger (Ed.), Descartes: Philosophy, Mathematics and Physics (pp. 97-140). Brighton: Harvester Press.
Gould, S. J. (1999). Rock of Ages: Science and Religion in the Fullness of Life. New York: Ballantine Books.
Hanson, N. R. (1965). Newton’s First Law: A Philosopher’s Door into Natural Philosophy. In R. G. Colodny (Ed.), Beyond the Edge of Certainty (pp. 6-28). Englewood-Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Hempel, C. G. (1958). The Theoretician's Dilemma, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 2. (Reprinted from Aspects of Scientific Explanation, pp. 173-226 by C. G. Hempel, 1965, New York: Macmillan)
Hempel, C. G. & Oppenheim, P. (1948). Studies in the Logic of Explanation. Philosophy of Science 15, 135-175. (Reprinted from Aspects of Scientific Explanation, pp. 245- 290 by C. G. Hempel, 1965, New York: Macmillan)
Hodson, D. (2009). Teaching and Learning about Science: Language, Theories, Methods, History, Traditions and Values. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Holton, G. (1952). Introduction to Concepts and Theories in Physical Science. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Second edition (revised with S. G. Brush) 1985, third edition Physics the Human Adventure, 2001.
Holton, G. (1973). Physics and Culture: Criteria for Curriculum Design and Modern Science and the Intellectual Tradition. In G. Holton (Ed.), Thematic Origins of Scientific Thought. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Hume, D. (1739/1888). A Treatise of Human Nature: Being an Attempt to Introduce the Experimental Method of Reasoning into Moral Subjects. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Huxley, T. H. (1885/1964). Science and Education. New York, The Citadel Press.
Irzik, G. & Nola, R. (2011). A Family Resemblance Approach to the Nature of Science for Science Education. Science & Education, 20.
Israel, J. (2001). Radical Enlightenment: Philosophy and the Making of Modernity 1650-1750. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kipnis, N. (1992). Rediscovering Optics. Minneapolis MN: BENA Press.
Kipnis, N. (1996). The “Historical-Investigative” Approach to Teaching Science. Science & Education, 5(3), 277-292.
Kipnis, N. (1998). A History of Science Approach to the Nature of Science: Learning Science by Rediscovering It. In W. F. McComas (Ed.), The Nature of Science in Science Education: Rationales and Strategies (pp. 177-196), Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Kirschner, P., Sweller, J. & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why Minimally Guided Learning Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Discovery Learning, ProblemBased Learning, Experiential Learning and InquiryBased Learning. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75-96.
Kitcher, P. & Salmon, W. C. (Eds.). (1989). Scientific Explanation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Klopfer, L. E. (1969). Case Histories and Science Education. San Francisco: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (2nd edition). Chicago: Chicago University Press. (First edition, 1962).
Lacey, H. (2005). Values and Objectivity in Science, Lantham MD: Lexington Books.
Lakatos, I. & Musgrave, A. (Eds.). (1970). Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lakatos, I. (1970). Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. In I. Lakatos & A. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge (pp. 91-196). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Laudan, L. (1996). The Demise of the Demarcation Problem. In L. Laudan (Ed.), Beyond Positivism and Relativism (pp.210-222). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students’ and Teachers’ Conceptions of the Nature of Science: A Review of the Research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4), 331- 359.
Lederman, N. G. (2004). Syntax of Nature of Science within Inquiry and Science Instruction. In L. B. Flick & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Scientific Inquiry and Nature of Science (pp. 301-317). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Lederman, N. G. (2007). Nature of Science: Past, Present and Future. In S. K. Bell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Science Education (pp. 831-879). Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Lederman, N., Abd-el-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L. & Schwartz, R. S. (2002). Views of Nature of Science Questionnaire: Towards Valid and Meaningful Assessment of Learners’ Conceptions of the Nature of Science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 497-521.
Lederman, N. G., Schwartz, R. S., Abd-El-Khalick, F. & Bell, R. L. (2001). Preservice Teachers’ Understanding and Teaching of the Nature of Science: An Interventionist Study. The Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education, 1(2), 135-160.
Mach, E. (1886/1986). On Instruction in the Classics and the Sciences. In E. Mach (Ed.), Popular Scientific Lectures (pp. 338-374). La Salle: Open Court Publishing Company.
Martin, M. (1972). Concepts of Science Education: A Philosophical Analysis. New York: Scott, Foresman & Co. (Reprint, University Press of America, 1985)
Martin, M. (1974). The Relevance of Philosophy of Science for Science Education. Boston Studies in Philosophy of Science, 32, 293-300
Matthews, M. R. (1989). The Scientific Background to Modern Philosophy, Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.
Matthews, M. R. (1990). History, Philosophy, and Science Teaching: What Can Be Done in an Undergraduate Course? Studies in Philosophy and Education, 10(1), 93-98.
Matthews, M. R. (1998). Constructivism and Science Education: A Philosophical Examination. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Matthews, M. R. (1992a). Old Wine in New Bottles: A Problem with Constructivist Epistemology. In H. Alexander (Ed.), Philosophy of Education 1992 (pp. 303- 311). Proceedings of the Forty-Eighth Annual Meeting of the Philosophy of Education Society. Urbana, IL: Philosophy of Education Society.
Matthews, M. R. (1992b). Constructivism and the Empiricist Legacy. In M.K. Pearsall (Ed.) Scope, Sequence and Coordination of Secondary School Science: Relevant Research (pp. 183-196). Washington, DC: National Science Teachers Association.
Matthews, M. R. (1994). Science Teaching: The Role of History and Philosophy of Science. New York: Routledge.
Matthews, M. R. (1997). James T. Robinson’s Account of Philosophy of Science and Science Teaching: Some Lessons for Today from the 1960s. Science Education, 81(3), 295-315.
Matthews, M. R. (2000). Constructivism in Science and Mathematics Education. In D.C. Phillips (Ed.) National Society for the Study of Education 99th Yearbook (pp. 161- 192). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.
Matthews, M. R. (2000). Time for Science Education: How Teaching the History and Philosophy of Pendulum Motion can Contribute to Science Literacy. New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Matthews, M. R. (2004). Thomas Kuhn and Science Education: What Lessons can be Learnt? Science Education, 88(1), 90-118.
Matthews, M. R. (2009). Teaching the Philosophical and Worldview Dimension of Science. Science & Education, 18(6-7), 697-728.
Matthews, M. R., Gauld, C. F. & Stinner, A. (Eds.). (2005). The Pendulum: Scientific, Historical, Philosophical and Educational Perspectives. Dordrecht: Springer.
Maxwell, G. (1962). The Ontological Status of Theoretical Entities. Minnesota Studies in Philosophy of Science, 3, 3-27.
Mayer, R. E. (2004). Should there be a Three-Strikes Rule Against Pure Discovery Learning? The Case for Guided Methods of Instruction. American Psychologist, 59(1), 14- 19.
McComas, W. F. (1998). The Nature of Science in Science Education: Rationales and Strategies. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Nasr, S. H. (1996). Religion and the Order of Nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Newton, I. (1729/1934). Mathematical Principles of Mathematical Philosophy. Berkeley: University of California Press. (Translated A. Motte, revised F. Cajori)
Nola, R. & Sankey, H. (2000). A Selective Survey of Theories of Scientific Method. In R. Nola. & H. Sankey (Eds.), After Popper, Kuhn and Feyerabend (pp. 1-65). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Nowak, L. (1980). The Structure of Idealization. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Peters, R. S. (1966). Ethics and Education. London: George Allen and Unwin.
Phillips, D.C. (1992). On Castigatiing Constructivists. In H. Alexander (Ed.), Philosophy of Education 1992 (pp. 312- 315). Proceedings of the Forty-Eighth Annual Meeting of the Philosophy of Education Society. Urbana, IL: Philosophy of Education Society.
Pólya, G. (1977). Mathematical Methods in Science. Washington: Mathematical Association of America.
Popper, K. R. (1963). Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Porter, R. (2000). The Enlightenment: Britain and the Creation of the Modern World. London: Penguin Books.
Psillos, S. (1999). Scientific Realism: How Science Tracks Truth. London: Routledge.
Radnitzky, G. & Andersson, G. (Eds.). (1978). Progress and Rationality in Science. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Rescher, N. (1987). Scientific Realism: A Critical Reappraisal, Dordrecht: Reidel.
Robinson, J. T. (1968). The Nature of Science and Science Teaching. Belmont CA: Wadsworth.
Roth, M-W. & Roychoudhury, A. (1994). Physics Students’ Epistemologies and Views about Knowing and Learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(1), 5- 30.
Ruse, M. & Richards, R. J. (Eds.). (2009). The Cambridge Companion to the “Origin of Species.” Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rutherford, F. J. (1972). A Humanistic Approach to Science Teaching. National Association of Secondary School Principals Bulletin, 56(361), 53-63.
Schwab, J. J. (1949). The Nature of Scientific Knowledge as Related to Liberal Education. Journal of General Education 3, 245-266. (Reprinted in I. Westbury & N. J. Wilkof (Eds.), Joseph J. Schwab: Science, Curriclum, and Liberal Education, Chicago: University of Chicago Press , 1978).
Schwab, J. J. (1958). The Teaching of Science as Inquiry. Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, 14, 374-379. (Reprinted in J. J. Schwab & P. F. Brandwein (Eds.), The Teaching of Science, Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1960).
Schwartz, R. & Lederman, N. (2008). What Scientists Say: Scientists’ Views of Nature of Science and Relation to Science Context. International Journal of Science Education, 30 (6), 727-771.
Scott, P., Asoko, H., Driver, R. & Emberton, J. (1994). Working from Children’s Ideas: Planning and Teaching a Chemistry Topic from a Constructivist Perspective. In P. Fensham, R. Gunstone & R. White (Eds.), The Content of Science: A Constructivist Approach to its Teaching and Learning (pp. 201-220). London: Falmer Press.
Shimony, A. (1993). Search for a Naturalistic World View. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Shimony, A. (1997). Some Historical and Philosophical Reflections on Science and Enlightenment. In L. Darden (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1996 PSA Meeting (pp. 1- 14).
Snook, I. A. (1972). Concepts of Indoctrination. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Solomon, J. (1994). The Rise and Fall of Constructivism. Studies in Science Education, 23, 1-19.
Stebbing, L.S. (1937/1958). Philosophy and the Physicists. New York: Dover Publications.
Strevens, M. (2008). Depth: An Account of Scientific Explanation. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Symons, A., Brass, K. & Odgers, S. (1994). Year 9 Bodies’. In P. Fensham, R. Gunstone & R. White (Eds.), The Content of Science (pp. 177-184). London: Falmer Press.
Tresmontant, C. (1965). Christian Metaphysics. New York: Sheed and Ward.
Tucker, R. C. (1972). The Marx-Engels Reader. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.
Uzuntiryaki, E., Boz, Y. & Kirbulut, D. (2010). Do Preservice Chemitry Teachers Reflect their Beliefs about Constructivism in their Teaching Practices? Research in Science Education, 40(3), 403-424.
Viennot, L. & Rozier, S. (1994). Pedagogical Outcomes of Research in Science Education: Examples in Mechanics and Thermodynamics. In P. Fensham, R. Gunstone and R. White (Eds.) The Content of Science (pp. 237-254). London: Falmer Press.
Wartofsky, M. W. (1968). Conceptual Foundations of Scientific Thought: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Science. New York: Macmillan.
Wartofsky, M. W. (1977). Feuerbach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Yeany, R. H. (1991). A Unifying Theme in Science Education? NARST News, 33(2), 1-3.

How to cite this article

APA

Yalaki, Y., & Çakmakcı, G. (2010). A Conversation with Michael R. Matthews: The Contribution of History and Philosophy of Science to Science Teaching and Research. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 6(4), 287-309. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75250

Vancouver

Yalaki Y, Çakmakcı G. A Conversation with Michael R. Matthews: The Contribution of History and Philosophy of Science to Science Teaching and Research. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2010;6(4):287-309. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75250

AMA

Yalaki Y, Çakmakcı G. A Conversation with Michael R. Matthews: The Contribution of History and Philosophy of Science to Science Teaching and Research. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2010;6(4), 287-309. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75250

Chicago

Yalaki, Yalçın, and Gültekin Çakmakcı. "A Conversation with Michael R. Matthews: The Contribution of History and Philosophy of Science to Science Teaching and Research". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2010 6 no. 4 (2010): 287-309. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75250

Harvard

Yalaki, Y., and Çakmakcı, G. (2010). A Conversation with Michael R. Matthews: The Contribution of History and Philosophy of Science to Science Teaching and Research. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 6(4), pp. 287-309. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75250

MLA

Yalaki, Yalçın et al. "A Conversation with Michael R. Matthews: The Contribution of History and Philosophy of Science to Science Teaching and Research". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 6, no. 4, 2010, pp. 287-309. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75250