Do Students Trust in Mathematics or Intuition during Physics Problem Solving? An Epistemic Game Perspective

Ahmet Yavuz

doi:10.12973/eurasia.2014.1205a

Full Text (PDF)

Ahmet Yavuz ¹ ^*

More Detail

¹ Nigde University, TURKEY^* Corresponding Author

Abstract

This study aims to investigate (1) students‘ trust in mathematics calculation versus intuition in a physics problem solving and (2) whether this trust is related to achievement in physics in the context of epistemic game theoretical framework. To achieve this research objective, paper-pencil and interview sessions were conducted. A paper-pencil test was administered to 83 freshmen students. In paper-pencil test students were asked to calculate accelerations of four vehicles with different masses doing a drag race and to indicate which vehicle would win the race. Analyses revealed two themes: (1) ―Math does not lie!‖ (for 43% of students) and (2) ―Intuition does not mislead!‖ (for 57% of students). Interview analysis revealed that students‘ trust in mathematics calculation stems from the convincing and realistic nature of calculations and the misleading nature of intuitive knowledge. It was found that students‘ trust in intuitive knowledge stems from their intuitive expectations. The findings also revealed a significant association between students‘ trust in mathematics calculation and their achievement in the general physics course.

Keywords

epistemic games
intuitive knowledge
mathematical calculations
physics education
students‘ achievement

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Research Article

EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed, 2015, Volume 11, Issue 3, 633-646

https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1205a

Publication date: 11 Apr 2015

Article Views: 1794

Article Downloads: 943

Open Access References How to cite this article

References

Adams, W. K., Perkins, K. K., Podolefsky, N. S., Dubson, M., Finkelstein, N. D., & Wieman, C. E. (2006). New instrument for measuring student beliefs about physics and learning physics: The Colorado Learning Attitudes about Science Survey. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 2(1), 010101. doi:10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.2.010101
Blay, M., (1995). Les "Principia" de Newton. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France–PUF.
Champagne, A. B., Gunstone, R. F., & Klopfer, L. E. (1982). A perspective on the differences between expert and novice performance in solving physics problems. Research in Science Education, 12(1), 71–77. doi:10.1007/BF02357016
Chi, M., Feltovich, P., & Glaser, R. (1981).Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5(2), 152, 121. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog0502_2
Clement, J. (1982). Students‘ preconceptions in introductory mechanics. American Journal of Physics, 50(1), 66–71. doi:10.1119/1.12989
Clement, J. (1994). Imagistic simulation and physical intuition in expert problem solving. In Proceedings of the 16th annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (201–206).
Coelho, R. L. (2010). On the concept of force: How understanding its history can improve physics teaching. Science & Education, 19(1), 91–113. doi:10.1007/s11191- 008-9183-1
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications, Inc.
diSessa, A. A. (1993). Toward an epistemology of physics. Cognition and Instruction, 10(2/3), 105–225. doi:10.2307/3233725
Dufresne, R. J., Gerace, W. J., & Leonard, W. J. (1997). Solving physics problems with multiple representations. The Physics Teacher, 35(5), 270–275. doi:10.1119/1.2344681
Elby, A. (2001). Helping physics students learn how to learn. American Journal of Physics, 69, S54. doi:10.1119/1.1377283
Halloun, I. A., & Hestenes, D. (1985a). The initial knowledge state of college physics students. American Journal of Physics, 53(11), 1043–1055. doi:10.1119/1.14030
Hallouna, I. A., & Hestenes, D. (1985b).Common sense concepts about motion. American Journal of Physics, 53(11), 1056–1065. doi:10.1119/1.14031
Hammer, D. (1994). Epistemological Beliefs in Introductory Physics. Cognition and Instruction, 12(2), 151–183. doi:10.2307/3233679
Heller, J. I., & Reif, F. (1984). Prescribing Effective Human Problem-Solving Processes: Problem Description in Physics. Cognition and Instruction, 1(2), 177–216. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci0102_2
Hofer, B. K., & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67(1), 88–140.
Huffman, D. (1997). Effect of explicit problem solving instruction on high school students‘ problem-solving performance and conceptual understanding of physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(6), 551–570. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199708)34:63.0.CO;2-M
Jonassen, D. H. (2000).Toward a design theory of problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(4), 63–85. doi:10.1007/BF02300500
Lagrange, J.-L. (1788). Méchanique analitique. Desaint (Paris). Retrieved from http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k862625
Leonard, W. J., Dufresne, R. J., & Mestre, J. P. (1996). Using qualitative problem-solving strategies to highlight the role of conceptual knowledge in solving problems. American Journal of Physics, 64 (12), 1495–1503. doi:10.1119/1.18409
McCloskey, M., Washburn, A., & Felch, L. (1983). Intuitive physics: The straight-down belief and its origin. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9(4), 636.
McDermott, L. C. (1984). Research on conceptual understanding in mechanics. Physics Today, 37, 24. doi:10.1063/1.2916318
Mestre, J. P., Thaden-Koch, T. C., Dufresne, R. J., & Gerace, W. J. (2004). The dependence of knowledge deployment on context among physics novices. In ProceedingsInternational School of Physics Enrico Fermi (Vol. 156, p. 367–408).
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1999). Qualitative data analysis. SAGE.
Ploetzner, R. & Spada, H. 1993. ―Multiple mental representations of information in physics problem solving‖. In The cognitive psychology of knowledge, Edited by: Strube, G. and Wender, K. F. 285–312.
Ploetzner, R., & VanLehn, K. (1997). The acquisition of qualitative physics knowledge during textbook-based physics training. Cognition and Instruction, 15(2), 169–205. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci1502_2
Redish, E. F. (2004). A theoretical framework for physics education research: Modeling student thinking. In Proceedings of the International School of Physics "Enrico Fermi" IOS Press, 1-63.
Redish, E. F., & Smith, K. A. (2008). Looking Beyond Content: Skill Development for Engineers. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3), 295–307. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00980.x
Redish, E. F., Saul, J. M., & Steinberg, R. N. (1998). Student expectations in introductory physics. American Journal of Physics, 66 (3), 212. doi:10.1119/1.18847
Reif, F. (1995). Millikan Lecture 1994: Understanding and teaching important scientific thought processes. American Journal of Physics, 63 (1), 17–32. doi:10.1119/1.17788
Reif, F., Larkin, H., & Brackett, G. C. (1976). Teaching general learning and problem-solving skills. American Journal of Physics, 44(3), 212–217. doi:10.1119/1.10458
Sherin, B. (2006). Common sense clarified: The role of intuitive knowledge in physics problem solving. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(6), 535–555. doi:10.1002/tea.20136
Sherin, B. L. (2001). How students understand physics equations. Cognition and Instruction, 19(4), 479–541.
Singh, C. (2002). When physical intuition fails. American Journal of Physics, 70(11), 1103–1109. doi:10.1119/1.1512659
Taşar, M. (2010). What part of the concept of acceleration is difficult to understand: the mathematics, the physics, or both? ZDM. doi:10.1007/s11858-010-0262-9
Trowbridge, D. E., & McDermott, L. C. (1981). Investigation of Student Understanding of the Concept of Acceleration in One Dimension. American Journal of Physics, 49(3), 242–253. doi:10.1119/1.12525
Tuminaro, J., & Redish, E. F. (2007). Elements of a cognitive model of physics problem solving: Epistemic games. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 3(2),0201011–02010122. doi:10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.020101
Yavuz, A. (2007). Stratégie de résolution d’exercice en mécanique du point matériel. Stratégie des enseignants et difficultés des étudiants de la première année universitaire: Exemple du problème de la machine d’Atwood (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). Université Jospeh Fourier Grenoble 1 France. Retrieved from http://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00174030/en

How to cite this article

APA

Yavuz, A. (2015). Do Students Trust in Mathematics or Intuition during Physics Problem Solving? An Epistemic Game Perspective. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(3), 633-646. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1205a

Vancouver

Yavuz A. Do Students Trust in Mathematics or Intuition during Physics Problem Solving? An Epistemic Game Perspective. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2015;11(3):633-46. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1205a

AMA

Yavuz A. Do Students Trust in Mathematics or Intuition during Physics Problem Solving? An Epistemic Game Perspective. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2015;11(3), 633-646. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1205a

Chicago

Yavuz, Ahmet. "Do Students Trust in Mathematics or Intuition during Physics Problem Solving? An Epistemic Game Perspective". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2015 11 no. 3 (2015): 633-646. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1205a

Harvard

Yavuz, A. (2015). Do Students Trust in Mathematics or Intuition during Physics Problem Solving? An Epistemic Game Perspective. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(3), pp. 633-646. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1205a

MLA

Yavuz, Ahmet "Do Students Trust in Mathematics or Intuition during Physics Problem Solving? An Epistemic Game Perspective". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 11, no. 3, 2015, pp. 633-646. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1205a