Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

• Abrams, E. D., Southerland, S. A., & Evans, C. (2008). Inquiry in the classroom: Identifying necessary components of a useful definition. In E. Abrams, S. A. Southerland, & P. Silva (Eds.) Inquiry in the Classroom: Realities and Opportunities (pp. xi-xlii). Charlotte, NC: IAP.
• Alexander, B. (2006). Web 2.0: A new wave of innovation for teaching and learning? Educause Review, 6(1)2, 32–44.
• American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
• Anderson, D., & Zhang, Z. (2003). Teacher perceptions of field-trip planning and implementation. Visitor Studies Today, 6(3), 6-11.
• Anderson, R. (2002). Reforming science teaching: What research says about inquiry? Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(1), 1–12. doi:10.1023/A:1015171124982.
• Avraamidou, L., & Roth, W. M. (Eds.). (2016). Intersections of Formal and Informal Science. Routledge.
• Bawden, D. (2008). Origins and concepts of digital literacy. In C. Lankshear & M. Knobel (Eds.), Digital literacies: Concepts, policies & practices. (pp. 17-32). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
• Behrendt, M., & Franklin, T. (2014). A Review of Research on School Field Trips and Their Value in Education. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 9(3), 235-245.
• Bell, P., Lewenstein, B., Shouse, A., & Feder, M. (Eds.). (2009). Learning science in informal environments: People, places, and pursuits. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
• Bell, R. L. (2008). Observation or inference: A “burning” question. In R. L. Bell (Ed.), Teaching the nature of science through process skills: Activities for grades 3-8 (pp. 36-44). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
• Bell, R. L., Smetana, L., & Binns, I. (2005). Simplifying inquiry instruction. The Science Teacher, 72(7): 30-33.
• Bitgood, S., Serrell, B., & Thompson, D. (1994). The impact of information education on visitors to museums. In V. Crane (Ed.), Informal science learning: what the research says about television, science museums, and community-based projects (pp. 61-106). Dedham, MA: Research Communications.
• Capps, D. K., Crawford, B. A., & Constas, M. A. (2012). A review of empirical literature on inquiry professional development: Alignment with best practices and a critique of the findings. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23(3), 291-318.
• Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155-9. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155.
• Cox-Petersen, A.M., & Pfaffinger, J.A. (1998). Teacher preparation and teacher-student interactions at a discovery center of natural history. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 10(2), 20-35.
• Crawford, B. A. (2007). Learning to teach science as inquiry in the rough and tumble of practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(4), 613-642.
• Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Hermanson, K. (1995). What makes visitors want to learn? Intrinsic motivation in museums. Museum News, 74(3), 34-37.
• Dierking, L. D., Falk, J. H., Rennie, L., Anderson, D., & Ellenbogen, K. (2003). Policy statement of the “informal science education” ad hoc committee. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(2), 108-111. doi: 10.1002/tea.10066.
• Duschl, R. (2008). Science education in three-part harmony: Balancing conceptual, epistemic, and social learning goals. Review of Research in Education, 32, 268-291.
• Duschl, R. A., Schweingruber, H. A., & Shouse, A. W. (Eds.). (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
• Economou, M., & Meintani, E. (2011). Promising beginnings? Evaluating museum mobile phone apps. In L. Ciolfi, K. Scott, & S. Barbieri (Eds.), Re-thinking technology in museums: Emerging experiences (n.p.), Limerick, Ireland: University of Limerick. Retrieved from http://www.idc.ul.ie/techmuseums11/paper/paper8.pdf.
• Eshach, H. (2007). Bridging in-school and out-of-school learning: Formal, non-formal, and informal education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16(2), 171–190. doi: 10.1007/s10956-006-9027-1.
• Eshet-Alkalai, Y. (2004). Digital literacy: A conceptual framework for survival skills in the digital era. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 13(1), 93-106.
• Evolution & the Nature of Science Institutes (ENSI). (1999). Sunsets, souls, and senses. In Nature of science lessons. Retrieved from http://www.indiana.edu/~ensiweb/lessons/sunsets.html.
• Evolution & the Nature of Science Institutes (ENSI). The great fossil find. In Nature of science lessons. Retrieved from http://www.indiana.edu/~ensiweb/lessons/gr.fs.fd.html.
• Falk, J., & Storksdieck, M. (2005). Using the contextual model of learning to understand visitor learning from a science center exhibition. Science Education, 89(5), 744-778.
• Filippini-Fantoni, S., & Bowen, J. (2007) Bookmarking in museums: Extending the museum experience beyond the visit? In J. Trant and D. Bearman (Eds). Museums and the Web 2007 (pp. 115-126). Toronto, Canada: Archives & Museum Informatics. Retrieved from http://www.archimuse.com/mw2007/papers/filippini-fantoni/filippini-fantoni.html.
• Granger, E.M., T. Bevis, Y. Saka, S. Southerland, V. Sampson, & Tate, R. (2012). The efficacy of student centered instruction in supporting science learning. Science, 338, 105-108.
• Griffin, J. (2004). Research on students and museums: Looking more closely at the students in school groups. Science Education, 88, S56-S70.
• Griffin, J., & Symington, D. (1997). Moving from task-oriented to learning-oriented strategies on school excursions to museums. Science Education, 81(6), 763-779.
• Hall, T., & Bannon, L. (2006). Designing ubiquitous computing to enhance children’s learning in museums. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22(4), 231-243.
• Hobbs, R. (2011). Empowering learners with digital and media literacy. Knowledge Quest, 39(5), 13-17.
• Hofstein, A., & Rosenfeld, S. (1996). Bridging the gap between formal and informal science learning. Rehovot, Israel: Weizmann Institute of Science.
• Holmes, J. A. (2012). Use of pre- and post-museum visit classroom activities by kindergarten-eighth grade teachers. Literacy Information and Computer Education Journal, 1,794-800.
• Hwang, G. J., Tsai, C. C., Chu, H. C., Kinshuk, & Chen, C. H. (2012). A context-aware ubiquitous learning approach to conducting scientific inquiry activities in a science park. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(5), 931-947.
• Judson, E. (2013). The relationship between time allocated for science in elementary schools and state accountability policies. Science Education, 97(4), 621-636.
• Kisiel, J. F. (2003). Revealing teacher agendas: An examination of teacher motivations and strategies for conducting museum fieldtrips. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Information and Learning Company. (UMI No. 3133296).
• Kisiel, J. F. (2007). Examining teacher choices for science museum worksheets. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18, 29-43.
• Knapp, D. & Barrie, E. U. (2001). Content evaluation of an environmental science field trip. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 10(4), 351-357.
• Lee, O., Lewis, S., Adamson, K., Maerten-Rivera, J., & Secada, W. G. (2008). Urban elementary school teachers’ knowledge and practices in teaching science to English language learners. Science Education, 92, 733-758.
• Looi, C. K., Lim, K. F., Pang, J., Koh, A. L. H., Seow, P., Sun, D., ... & Soloway, E. (2016). Bridging formal and informal learning with the use of mobile technology. In Future Learning in Primary Schools (pp. 79-96). Springer Singapore.
• Marty, P. F., Alemanne, N. D., Mendenhall, A., Maurya, M., Southerland, S. A., Sampson, V., ... & Schellinger, J. (2013). Scientific inquiry, digital literacy, and mobile computing in informal learning environments. Learning, Media and Technology, 38(4), 407-428.
• Morag, O., & Tal, T. (2012). Assessing learning in the outdoors with the field trip in natural environments (FiNE) framework. International Journal of Science Education, 34(5), 745-777.
• National Academy of Sciences. (1998). Chapter 6: Activities for teaching about evolution and the nature of science. In Teaching about evolution and the nature of science (pp. 61-104). Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
• National Research Council (NRC). (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
• NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
• Price, S., & Hein, G. E. (1991). More than a field trip: Science programmes for elementary school groups at museums. International Journal of Science Education, 13(5), 505-519.
• Proctor, N. (Ed.) (2011). Mobile apps for museums. Washington, DC: American Association of Museums.
• Rennie, L. J., & McClafferty, T. P. (1995). Using visits to interactive science and technology centers, museums, aquaria, and zoos to promote learning in science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 6(4), 175-185.
• Rogers, Y., & Price, S. (2009). How mobile technologies are changing the way children learn. In A. Druin (Ed.), Mobile technology for children: Designing for interaction (pp.5-22). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Morgan Kaufman.
• Schaller, D.T., & Allison-Bunnell, S. (2005). Learning styles and online interactives. In D. Bearman & J. Trant (Eds.), Museums and the Web 2005 (n.p.). Toronto, Canada: Archives and Museum Informatics. Retrieved from http://www.archimuse.com/mw2005/papers/schaller/schaller.html.
• Schwartz, R. S., Lederman, N., & Lederman, N. (2008, April). An instrument to assess views of scientific inquiry: The VOSI Questionnaire. Paper presented at the international conference of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Baltimore, Maryland.
• Soloway, E. (1991) How the Nintendo generation learns. Communications of the ACM, 34(9), 23-26/95.
• Southerland, S. A. (2013). The Possibilities of Teaching “Science for All” Given National Education Policy: How Policy Influences the Equitable Teaching of Science. In Bianchini, J., Akerson, V., Calabrese Barton, A., Lee, O. & Rodriguez, A. (Eds.) Moving the equity agenda forward, pp. 21-38. Netherlands: Springer.
• Tallon, L., & Walker, K. (Eds). (2008). Digital technologies and the museum experience: Handheld guides and other media. Lanham, MD: Altamira Press.
• Vitone, T., Stofer, K. A., Steininger, M. S., Hulcr, J., Dunn, R., & Lucky, A. (2016). School of ants goes to college: integrating citizen science into the general education classroom increases engagement with science. J. Sci. Commun., 15, 1-24.
• Vogel, B., Spikol, D., Kurti, A., & Milrad, M. (2010). Integrating mobile, web and sensory technologies to support inquiry-based science learning. In Proceedings of the 6th IEEE International Conference on Wireless, Mobile, and Ubiquitous Technologies in Education (pp. 65- 72). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society.
• Wakkary, R., & Evernden, D. (2005). Museum as ecology: A case study analysis of an ambient intelligent museum guide. In D. Bearman & J. Trant (Eds.), Museums and the Web 2005 (pp.151-164). Toronto, Canada: Archives and Museum Informatics. Retrieved from http://www.archimuse.com/mw2005/papers/wakkary/wakkary.html.
• Woodruff, A., Rosenholtz, R., Morrison, J. B., Faulring, A., & Pirolli, P. (2002). A comparison of the use of text summaries, plain thumbnails, and enhanced thumbnails for Web search tasks. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(2), 172-185.
• Zimmerman, H. T., & Land, S. M. (2017). Integrating Mobile Computers into Informal Science Education. In Preparing Informal Science Educators (pp. 169-183). Springer International Publishing.

APA

Schellinger, J., Mendenhall, A., Alemanne, N. D., Southerland, S. A., Sampson, V., Douglas, I., Kazmer, M. M., & Marty, P. F. (2017). “Doing Science” in Elementary School: Using Digital Technology to Foster the Development of Elementary Students’ Understandings of Scientific Inquiry. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(8), 4635-4649. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00955a

Vancouver

Schellinger J, Mendenhall A, Alemanne ND, Southerland SA, Sampson V, Douglas I, et al. “Doing Science” in Elementary School: Using Digital Technology to Foster the Development of Elementary Students’ Understandings of Scientific Inquiry. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2017;13(8):4635-49. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00955a

AMA

Schellinger J, Mendenhall A, Alemanne ND, et al. “Doing Science” in Elementary School: Using Digital Technology to Foster the Development of Elementary Students’ Understandings of Scientific Inquiry. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2017;13(8), 4635-4649. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00955a

Chicago

Schellinger, Jennifer, Anne Mendenhall, Nicole D. Alemanne, Sherry A. Southerland, Victor Sampson, Ian Douglas, Michelle M. Kazmer, and Paul F. Marty. "“Doing Science” in Elementary School: Using Digital Technology to Foster the Development of Elementary Students’ Understandings of Scientific Inquiry". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2017 13 no. 8 (2017): 4635-4649. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00955a

Harvard

Schellinger, J., Mendenhall, A., Alemanne, N. D., Southerland, S. A., Sampson, V., Douglas, I., . . . Marty, P. F. (2017). “Doing Science” in Elementary School: Using Digital Technology to Foster the Development of Elementary Students’ Understandings of Scientific Inquiry. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(8), pp. 4635-4649. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00955a

MLA

Schellinger, Jennifer et al. "“Doing Science” in Elementary School: Using Digital Technology to Foster the Development of Elementary Students’ Understandings of Scientific Inquiry". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 13, no. 8, 2017, pp. 4635-4649. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00955a