Enhancing STEM Education during School Transition: Bridging the Gap in Science Manipulative Skills

Hidayah Mohd Fadzil; Rohaida Mohd Saat

doi:10.12973/eurasia.2014.1071a

Full Text (PDF)

Hidayah Mohd Fadzil ¹, Rohaida Mohd Saat ¹ ^*

More Detail

¹ University of Malaya, MALAYSIA^* Corresponding Author

Abstract

The lack of exposure to practical work in primary schools leads to incompetency in manipulative skills and students may carry this problem with them to secondary school. To address this issues, an in-depth qualitative study was conducted during transition from primary to secondary school. The research involved 10 primary school students (grade 6) who were interviewed again in secondary school (grade 7). Manipulative skills during transition can be described by understanding of technical skills and functional aspects of performing laboratory tasks. Findings indicated that students’ cognitive knowledge did not reflect their true ability in manipulative skills. Further collaboration between primary and secondary schools should be considered in order to bridge the gap during transition.

Keywords

experiments
functional aspect
science manipulative skills
STEM education

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Research Article

EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed, 2014, Volume 10, Issue 3, 209-218

https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1071a

Publication date: 15 Dec 2014

Article Views: 4042

Article Downloads: 1797

Open Access References How to cite this article

References

Adey, P., Hewitt, G., Hewitt, J., & Landau, N. (2004). The professional development of teachers: Practice and theory. Kluwer Academic Publishers. New York, USA.
Adler, J. (1998). Resources as a verb: Reconceptualising resources in and for school mathematics, Proceedings of the 22nd Conference, Psychology of Mathematics Education, Vol. 1, University of Stellenbosch, South Africa, pp. 1-18.
Allen, M. (2012). Editorial. An international review of school science practical work. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 8(1), 1-2.
Abrahams, I. & Millar, R. (2011). Does practical work really work? A study of the effectiveness of practical work as a teaching and learning method in school science. International Journal of Science Education, 30, 1945-1969.
Anderson, J. R. (1982). Acquisition of cognitive skill. Psychological Review, 89, 369-406.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.
Braund, M., Crompton, Z., Driver, M., & Parvin, J. (2003) Bridging the key stage 2/3 gap in science. School Science Review, 85(310), 117-123.
Boejie, H. (2002). A purposeful approach to the constant comparative method in the analysis of qualitative interviews. Quality & Quantity, 36(4), 391-409.
Campbell, B. (2002). Pupils’ perceptions of science education at primary and secondary school. In H. Behrendt, H. Dahncke, R. Duit, W. Gräber, M. Komorek, A. Kross, P. Reiska (Eds.)Research in Science Education- Past, Present and Future. Netherlands: Springer. p. 125-130.
Diack, A. (2009). A smoother path: Managing the challenge of school transfer. Perspective in Education, 2, 39-51.
Doran, R., Fraser, B. J., & Giddings, G. J. (1995).Science laboratory skills among grade 9 students in Western Australia. International Journal of Science Education, 17(1), 27-44.
Fuccia, D., Witteck, T., Markic, S., & Eilks, I. (2012). Trend in practical work in German science education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 8(1), 59-72.
Galton, M. Gray, J. M., & Ruddock, J. (2003).Transfer and transitions in the middle years of schooling (7-14).Continuities and discontinuities in Learning. Research Report, Department of Education and Skills, Cambridge, UK.
Hawk, K., & Hill, J. (2004, April).Transition traumas, traps, turning points and triumphs: Putting student needs first. Paper presented at The Way Forward for Secondary Education Conference, Wellington, New Zealand.
Hofstein, A., &Mamlok., R. (2007). The laboratory in science education: the state of the art. Chemistry Education Research and Practice,8(2), 105-107).
Holt, R. W. (2002). Communicating skills: Science drawing. Holt Science and Technology. Retrieved from http://go.hrw.com/hrw.nd/gohrw_rls1/pKeywordRes ults?HS5%20SW-TOC
International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA). (2012). TIMSS 2011 International Science Report: Findings from IEA’s Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study at the Fourth and Eighth Grade. Boston, MA.
Kempa, R. F. (1986). Assessment in Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mahathir Mohamad. (1993). Malaysia: the way forward. In A. Hamid (Ed.), Malaysia’s Vision 2020: Understanding the concept, implications and challenges (pp. 403-420). Petaling Jaya: Pelanduk Publications.
Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Wiley.
Ministry of Education of Malaysia.(2008). Assessment guide for Science practical work assessment (UPSR). Ministry of Education of Malaysia: Malaysia Examination Board.
Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia (2011).Statistics of Higher Education of Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur.
Moni, R. W., Hryciw, D. H., Paronnik, P., Lluka, L. J., & Moni, K. B. (2007). Assessing core manipulative skills in a large, first-year laboratory. Advances in Physiology Education, 35(1), 266-269.
Noraini, Z. A. (2009). What do we mean by transition at secondary school for students with special educational needs: A case study in the Federal Territory, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Warwick, United Kingdom.
OECD. (2006). Assessing Scientific, Reading and Mathematical Literacy: A Framework for PISA 2006. Paris, France: OECD.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Ritchie, J., & Spencer, E. (1994).Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In A. Bryman & R. G. Burgess (Eds.), Analyzing qualitative data. London, UK: Routledge.
Saat, R. M. (2010). Issues in maintaining continuity and progression of students’ science learning. In A. Hussain & N. Idris (Eds.), Dimensions of education (pp. 275-291). New Delhi, India: Gyan.
Sorgo, A., & Spernjak, A. (2012). Practical work in Biology, Chemistry and Physics at lower secondary and general upper secondary schools in Slovenia. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 8(1), 11-19.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (2008).Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques (3rd ed.).Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Thurston, A., Christie, D., Karagiannidou, E., Murray, P. Tolmie, A., & Topping, K. (2010). Enhancing outcomes in school science for pupils during transition from elementary school using cooperative learning. Middle Grades Research Journal, 5(1), 19-32.
Trowbridge, L. W., Bybee, R.W & Powell, J. C. (2000). Teaching secondary school science. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Yakar, Z., & Baykara, H. (2014). Inquiry-based laboratory practices in a science teacher training program. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 10(2), 173-183.

How to cite this article

APA

Fadzil, H. M., & Saat, R. M. (2014). Enhancing STEM Education during School Transition: Bridging the Gap in Science Manipulative Skills. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 10(3), 209-218. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1071a

Vancouver

Fadzil HM, Saat RM. Enhancing STEM Education during School Transition: Bridging the Gap in Science Manipulative Skills. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2014;10(3):209-18. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1071a

AMA

Fadzil HM, Saat RM. Enhancing STEM Education during School Transition: Bridging the Gap in Science Manipulative Skills. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2014;10(3), 209-218. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1071a

Chicago

Fadzil, Hidayah Mohd, and Rohaida Mohd Saat. "Enhancing STEM Education during School Transition: Bridging the Gap in Science Manipulative Skills". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2014 10 no. 3 (2014): 209-218. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1071a

Harvard

Fadzil, H. M., and Saat, R. M. (2014). Enhancing STEM Education during School Transition: Bridging the Gap in Science Manipulative Skills. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 10(3), pp. 209-218. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1071a

MLA

Fadzil, Hidayah Mohd et al. "Enhancing STEM Education during School Transition: Bridging the Gap in Science Manipulative Skills". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 10, no. 3, 2014, pp. 209-218. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1071a