Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

• Adiguzel, T., Capraro, R. M., & Willson, V. L. (2011). An examination of teacher acceptance of handheld computers. International Journal of Special Education, 26(3), 12-27.
• Crook, A., Mauchline, A., Maw, S., Lawson, C., Drinkwater, R., Lundqvist, K., Orsmond, P., Gomez, S., & Park, J. (2012). The use of video technology for providing feedback to students: Can it enhance the feedback experience for staff and students? Computers & Education, 58(1), 386-396.
• Chen, Y. C., & Tsai, C. C. (2009). An educational research course facilitated by online peer assessment. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 46(1), 105-117.
• Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003.
• Ertmer, P. A., Richardson, J. C., Belland, B., Camin, D., Connolly, P., Coulthard, G., Lei, K, & Mong, C. (2007). Using peer feedback to enhance the quality of student online postings: An exploratory study. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 12(2), 412-433.
• Falchikov, N., & Blythman, M. (2001). Learning together: Peer tutoring in higher education. NY: RoutledgeFalmer.
• Gibbs, G., & Dunbar-Goddet, H. (2007). The effects of programme assessment environments on student learning. Oxford: The Higher Education Academy.
• Gielen, S., Peeters, E., Dochy, F., Onghena, P., & Struyven, K. (2010). Improving the effectiveness of peer feedback for learning. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 304-315.
• Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112.
• Hsia, L. H., Huang, I., & Hwang, G. J. (2016). Effects of different online peer-feedback approaches on students' performance skills, motivation and self-efficacy in a dance course. Computers & Education, 96, 55-71.
• Hu, P. J., Chau, P. Y., Liu Sheng, O. R., & Tam, K. Y. (1999). Examining the technology acceptance model using physician acceptance of telemedicine technology. Journal of Management Information Systems, 16(2), 91-112.
• Hung, S. T. A. (2016). Enhancing feedback provision through multimodal video technology. Computers & Education, 98, 90-101.
• Lee, H.-J., & Lim, C. (2012). Peer evaluation in blended team project-based learning: What do students find important? Educational Technology & Society, 15 (4), 214–224.
• Lees, D., & Carpenter, V. (2012). A qualitative assessment of providing quality electronically mediated feedback for students in higher education. International Journal of Learning Technology, 7(1), 95- 110.
• Li, L., & Steckelberg, A. L. (2004). The instructional design portfolio: Peer assessment support system (PASS). TechTrends, 49(4), 80-84.
• Lu, J., & Law, N. (2012). Online peer assessment: Effects of cognitive and affective feedback. Instructional Science, 40(2), 257-275.
• Ma, W. W., Andersson, R., & Streith, K. O. (2005). Examining user acceptance of computer technology: An empirical study of student teachers. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 387-395.
• Mason, B.J., & Bruning, R. (2001). Providing feedback in computer-based instruction: What the research tells us. Retrieved September 28, 2015, from University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Center of Instructional Innovation. http://dwb.unl.edu/Edit/MB/MasonBruning.html.
• Murray, J. A., & Boyd, S. (2015). A preliminary evaluation of using WebPA for online peer assessment of collaborative performance by groups of online distance learners. International Journal of ELearning & Distance Education, 30(2), 23-35.
• Nisbet, D. (2004). Measuring the quantity and quality of online discussion group interaction. Journal of eLiteracy, 1(2), 122-139.
• Paré, D. E., & Joordens, S. (2008). Peering into large lectures: examining peer and expert mark agreement using peerScholar, an online peer assessment tool. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(6), 526-540.
• Pavlou, A., & Kyza, E. A. (2013). An investigation of two methods for the technological mediation of collaborative peer feedback in higher education. In Scaling up Learning for Sustained Impact (pp. 274-287). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
• Rapee, R. M., & Hayman, K. (1996). The effects of video feedback on the self-evaluation of performance in socially anxious subjects. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 34(4), 315-322.
• Ruegg, R. (2014). The effect of assessment of peer feedback on the quantity and quality of feedback given. Papers in Language Testing and Assessment 3 (1), 24-43.
• Shannon, A., Hammer, J., Thurston, H., Diehl, N., & Dow, S. (2016). PeerPresents: A web-based system for in-class peer feedback during student presentations. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (pp. 447-458). NY: ACM.
• Strijbos, J. W., Narciss, S., & Dünnebier, K. (2010). Peer feedback content and sender's competence level in academic writing revision tasks: Are they critical for feedback perceptions and efficiency? Learning and instruction, 20(4), 291-303.
• Sung, Y. T., Chang, K. E., Chiou, S. K., & Hou, H. T. (2005). The design and application of a web-based self-and peer-assessment system. Computers & Education, 45(2), 187-202.
• Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995). Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information Systems Research, 6(1), 144-176.
• Thiemann, K. S., & Goldstein, H. (2001). Social stories, written text cues, and video feedback: effects on social communication of children with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 34(4), 425.
• Tseng, S. C., & Tsai, C. C. (2007). On-line peer assessment and the role of the peer feedback: A study of high school computer course. Computers & Education, 49(4), 1161-1174.
• Van der Pol, J., Van den Berg, B. A. M., Admiraal, W. F., & Simons, P. R. J. (2008). The nature, reception, and use of online peer feedback in higher education. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1804-1817.
• Wen, M. L., & Tsai, C. C. (2006). University students’ perceptions of and attitudes toward (online) peer assessment. Higher Education, 51(1), 27-44.
• West, J., & Turner, W. (2016). Enhancing the assessment experience: Improving student perceptions, engagement and understanding using online video feedback. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 53(4), 400-410.
• Xiao, Y., & Lucking, R. (2008). The impact of two types of peer assessment on students' performance and satisfaction within a Wiki environment. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(3), 186-193.
• Yu, F. Y., & Wu, C. P. (2013). Predictive effects of online peer feedback types on performance quality. Educational Technology & Society, 16(1), 332-341.

APA

Adiguzel, T., Varank, I., Erkoc, M. F., & Buyukimdat, M. K. (2017). Examining a Web-Based Peer Feedback System in an Introductory Computer Literacy Course. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(1), 237-251. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00614a

Vancouver

Adiguzel T, Varank I, Erkoc MF, Buyukimdat MK. Examining a Web-Based Peer Feedback System in an Introductory Computer Literacy Course. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2017;13(1):237-51. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00614a

AMA

Adiguzel T, Varank I, Erkoc MF, Buyukimdat MK. Examining a Web-Based Peer Feedback System in an Introductory Computer Literacy Course. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2017;13(1), 237-251. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00614a

Chicago

Adiguzel, Tufan, Ilhan Varank, Memet Fatih Erkoc, and Meryem Koskeroglu Buyukimdat. "Examining a Web-Based Peer Feedback System in an Introductory Computer Literacy Course". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2017 13 no. 1 (2017): 237-251. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00614a

Harvard

Adiguzel, T., Varank, I., Erkoc, M. F., and Buyukimdat, M. K. (2017). Examining a Web-Based Peer Feedback System in an Introductory Computer Literacy Course. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(1), pp. 237-251. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00614a

MLA

Adiguzel, Tufan et al. "Examining a Web-Based Peer Feedback System in an Introductory Computer Literacy Course". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 13, no. 1, 2017, pp. 237-251. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00614a