Examining the Pattern of Middle Grade Mathematics Teachers’ Performance: A Concurrent Embedded Mixed Methods Study

Sunyoung Han; Ceyhun Cetin; Shirley Matteson

doi:10.12973/eurasia.2016.1206a

Full Text (PDF)

Sunyoung Han ¹ ^* , Ceyhun Cetin ², Shirley Matteson ²

More Detail

¹ Sungkyunkwan University² Texas Tech University^* Corresponding Author

Abstract

Background:
The purpose of this study was to reveal the pattern in a structure of teachers’ instructional performance. Specifically, seven teachers’ performances (Standards and Objectives, Presenting Instructional Content, Lesson Structure and Pacing, Activities and Materials, Academic Feedback, Grouping Students, and Teacher Content Knowledge) were investigated.

Materials and methods:
An embedded mixed methods approach analyzed 426 reports concerning 175 classroom-capturing videos.

Results:
The findings showed a structured pattern and the relationships among the teachers’ performances. Also, multiple group analysis was employed to examine the differences between beginning and experienced teachers’ performance patterns. The beginning and experienced teachers presented different paths regarding the four performances: Activities and Materials, Grouping Students, Standards and Objectives, and Lesson Structure and Pacing.

Conclusions:
The findings of the current study have implications for teacher professional development.

Keywords

professional development
teaching performance
TAP rubric
video-based training

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Research Article

EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed, 2016, Volume 12, Issue 3, 387-409

https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1206a

Publication date: 01 Jul 2016

Article Views: 2403

Article Downloads: 4079

Open Access References How to cite this article

References

Alonzo, A. C. (2002). Evaluation of a model for supporting the development of elementary school teachers' science content knowledge. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED465613.pdf
Andrews, M. C. (2011). Meaningful engagement in educational activity and purposes for learning. Stanford University.
Berliner, D. C. (2001). Learning about and learning from expert teachers. International Journal of Educational Research, 35, 463–482.
Blömeke, S., Felbrich, A., Müller, C., Kaiser, G., & Lehmann, R. (2008). Effectiveness of teacher education. ZDM Mathematics Education, 40, 719–734.
Borko, H., Jacobs, J., Eiteljorg, E., & Pittman, M. E. (2008). Video as a tool for fostering productive discussions in mathematics professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 417-436. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2006.11.012
Borko, H., Koellner, K., Jacobs, J., & Seago, N. (2011). Using video representations of teaching in practice-based professional development programs. ZDM Mathematics Education, 43, 175-187.
Borko, H., & Livingston, C. (1989). Cognition and improvisation: Differences in mathematics instruction by expert and novice teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 26, 473-498
Brown, M. W. (2009) The teacher-tool relationship: Theorizing the design and use of curriculum materials. In J. T. Remillard, B. A. Herbel-Eisenmann & G. M. Lloyd (Eds), Mathematics teachers at work: Connecting curriculum materials and classroom instruction (pp. 17–36). New York, NY: Routledge.
Burris, C. C., Heubert, J. P., & Levin, H. M. (2006). Accelerating mathematics achievement using heterogeneous grouping. American Educational Research Journal, 43(1), 105-136.
Carbonneau, K. J., Marley, S. C., & Selig, J. P. (2013). A meta-analysis of the efficacy of teaching mathematics with concrete manipulatives. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 380- 400.
Cardona, O. L. Z. (2008). Teachers' Understanding of Students' Conceptions about Chance: An Expert-novice Contrast (Doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia).
Carreker, S., Joshi, R. M., & Boulware-Gooden, R. (2010). Spelling-related teacher knowledge: The impact of professional development on identifying appropriate instructional activities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 33(3), 148-158.
Chen, R. W., Lam, S. F., & Chan, J. C. (2008). When high achievers and low achievers work in the same group: The roles of group heterogeneity and processes in project based learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 205–221.
Cortina, K. S., Miller, K. F., McKenzie, R., & Epstein, A. (2015). Where low and high inference data converge: Validation of CLASS assessment of mathematics instruction using mobile eye tracking with expert and novice teachers. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(2), 389-403.
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Csikszentmihalyi, M., Rathunde, K., & Whalen, S. (1993). Talented teenagers: The roots of success and failure. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Darling-Hammond, L., Banks, J., Zumwalt, K., Gomez, L, Sherin, M. G., Griesdorn, J., & Finn, L. (2005). Educational goals and purposes: Developing a curricular vision for teaching. In L. Darling-Hammond & J. Bransford (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do (pp. 169-200). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Delandshere, G., & Arens, S. A. (2001). Representations of teaching and standards-based reform: are we closing the debate about teacher education? Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 547-566.
Fisher, C. W., & Berliner, D. C. (Eds.) (1985). Perspectives on instructional time. New York: Longman.
Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 915-945.
Gerring, J. (2007). Case Study Research: Principles and Practices. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Gess-Newsome, J., & Lederman, N. G. (1995). Biology teachers’ perceptions of subject matter structure and its relationship to classroom practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(3), 301–325.
Gettinger, M., & Seibert, J. K. (2002). Best practices in increasing academic learning time. Best Practices in School Psychology IV, 1, 773-787.
Good, T., & Brophy, J. (1996). Looking in classrooms (7th ed.). New York: Harper and Row.
Green, J. (2007). Standards from start to finish. Leadership, 37(1), 14.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2012). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research (7th ed.). NJ: Aldine Transaction.
Halla, S., & Ireson, J. (2005). Secondary school teachers’ pedagogic practices when teaching mixed and structured ability classes. Research Papers in Education, 20(1), 3-24.
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112.
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London and New York: Routledge.
Heller, J. I., Daehler, K., & Shinohara, M. (2003). Connecting all the pieces: Using an evaluation mosaic to answer an impossible question. Journal of Staff Development, 24, 36–41.
Hiebert, J., Morris, A. K., Berk, D., & Jansen, A. (2007). Preparing teachers to learn from teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 58(1). 47-61. doi: 10.1177/0022487106295726.
Hill, H. C., Blunk, M. L., Charalambous, C. Y., Lewis, J. M., Phelps, G. C., Sleep, L., & Ball, D. L. (2008). Mathematical knowledge for teaching and the mathematical quality of instruction: An exploratory study. Cognition and Instruction, 26, 430-511.
Iyer, R. B. (2013). Relation between cooperative learning and student achievement. International Journal of Education and Information Studies, 3(1), 21-25.
Jang, H., Reeve, J., & Deci, E. L. (2010). Engaging students in learning activities: It is not autonomy support or structure but autonomy support and structure. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 588-600.doi:10.1037/a0019682
Jerald, C. D., & van Hook, K. (2011). More than measurement: The system’s lessons learned from designing better teacher evaluation systems. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED533382.pdf
Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practices of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press.
Kleinknecht, M., & Schneider, J. (2013). What do teachers think and feel when analyzing videos of themselves and other teachers teaching? Teaching and Teacher Education,33, 13-23. doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.02.002
Leinhardt, G. (1989). Math lessons: A contrast of novice and expert competence. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20(1), 52-75.
Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2012). Mplus: The comprehensive modeling program for applied researchers: User’s guide. CA: Muthén & Muthén.
National Institute for Excellence in Teaching. (2009). Research summary: Updated September 2009. Retrieved from http://www.tapsystem.org/publications/tap_research_summary_0909.pdf
National Institute for Excellence in Teaching. (2011). Evaluation system handbook. Santa Monica, CA:Author.
Newman, I., Ridenour, C. S., Newman, C., & DeMarco, G. M. P. Jr. (2003). A typology of research purposes and its relationship to mixed methods. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 167-188). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.
Oliver, R. M., & Reschly, D. J. (2007). Effective classroom management: Teacher preparation and professional development. Washington, DC: National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality.
Ottmar, E. R., Decker, L. E., Cameron, C. E., Curby, T. W., & Rimm-Kaufman, S. E. (2014). Classroom instructional quality, exposure to mathematics instruction and mathematics achievement in fifth grade. Learning Environments Research, 17(2), 243-262.
Reigeluth, C. M. (1999). The elaboration theory: Guidance for scope and sequence decisions. In C. M. Reigluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. 2) (pp. 425-453). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Remillard, J. T. (2005) Examining key concepts in research on teachers’ use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 211–246.
Remillard, J. T., Herbel-Eisenmann, B. A., & Lloyd, G. M. (Eds.). (2011). Mathematics teachers at work: Connecting curriculum materials and classroom instruction. New York, NY: Routledge.
Reys, R., Reys, B., Lapan, R., Holliday, G., & Wasman, D. (2003). Assessing the impact of standards-based middle grades mathematics curriculum materials on student achievement. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34(1), 74–95.
Sadler, R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119-144.
Sanders, L. R., Borko, H., & Lockard, J. D. (1993). Secondary science teachers' knowledge base when teaching science courses in and out of their area of certification. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 723-736.
Schacter, J., & Thum, Y. M. (2004). Paying for high-and low-quality teaching. Economics of Education Review, 23, 411-430.
Schumacker, E. S., & Lomax, R. G. (2010). A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.
Sherin, M. G., & van Es, E. A. (2009). Effects of video club participation on teachers’ professional vision. Journal of Teacher Education, 60, 20-37.doi: 10.1177/0022487108328155
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
Stahl, R. J. (1994). The essential elements of cooperative learning in the classroom. ERIC Digest. Retrieved February, 2014 from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED370881.pdf
Thompson, C. J. (2009). Preparation, practice, and performance: An empirical examination of the impact of standards-based instruction on secondary students' math and science achievement. Research in Education, 81, 53-62.
van den Bergh, L., Ros, A., & Beijaard, D. (2013). Teacher feedback during active learning: Current practices in primary schools. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(2), 341-362.
Van Es, E. A. (2012). Examining the development of a teacher learning community: The case of a video club. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28, 182-192. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2011.09.005
Wehby, J. H., Symons, F. J., Canale, J. A., & Go, F. J. (1998). Teaching practices in classrooms for students with emotional and behavioral disorders: Discrepancies between recommendations and observations. Behavioral Disorders, 24(1), 51-56.
Zhang, F., Lundeberg, J., Koehler, M. J., & Eberhardt, J. (2011). Understanding affordances and challenges of three types of videos in professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27,454-462. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2010.09.01

How to cite this article

APA

Han, S., Cetin, C., & Matteson, S. (2016). Examining the Pattern of Middle Grade Mathematics Teachers’ Performance: A Concurrent Embedded Mixed Methods Study. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(3), 387-409. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1206a

Vancouver

Han S, Cetin C, Matteson S. Examining the Pattern of Middle Grade Mathematics Teachers’ Performance: A Concurrent Embedded Mixed Methods Study. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2016;12(3):387-409. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1206a

AMA

Han S, Cetin C, Matteson S. Examining the Pattern of Middle Grade Mathematics Teachers’ Performance: A Concurrent Embedded Mixed Methods Study. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2016;12(3), 387-409. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1206a

Chicago

Han, Sunyoung, Ceyhun Cetin, and Shirley Matteson. "Examining the Pattern of Middle Grade Mathematics Teachers’ Performance: A Concurrent Embedded Mixed Methods Study". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2016 12 no. 3 (2016): 387-409. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1206a

Harvard

Han, S., Cetin, C., and Matteson, S. (2016). Examining the Pattern of Middle Grade Mathematics Teachers’ Performance: A Concurrent Embedded Mixed Methods Study. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(3), pp. 387-409. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1206a

MLA

Han, Sunyoung et al. "Examining the Pattern of Middle Grade Mathematics Teachers’ Performance: A Concurrent Embedded Mixed Methods Study". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 12, no. 3, 2016, pp. 387-409. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1206a