Incorporating GeoGebra into Geometry Learning-A lesson from India

Kaushal Kumar Bhagat; Chun-Yen Chang

doi:10.12973/eurasia.2015.1307a

Full Text (PDF)

Kaushal Kumar Bhagat ¹, Chun-Yen Chang ¹ ^*

More Detail

¹ National Taiwan Normal University, TAIWAN^* Corresponding Author

Abstract

Students often find geometrical concepts abstract and difficult to understand. This results in poor performance, which contributes in the declining interest in geometry. The aim of this study was to examine the impact of using the free educational software program, ‗GeoGebra‘ on 9th grade student‘s mathematics achievement in learning geometry. A total of 50 students were selected from a government school located in the eastern part of India. The experimental group (25) was taught theorem on circles using GeoGebra while the control group (25) was taught utilizing traditional teaching methods. At the end of the treatment, students‘ mathematics achievements were measured using a post - test. The result indicated that GeoGebra is an effective tool for teaching and learning geometry in middle school

Keywords

GeoGebra
geometry
mathematics achievement
middle school

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Research Article

EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed, 2015, Volume 11, Issue 1, 77-86

https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1307a

Publication date: 16 Dec 2015

Article Views: 7296

Article Downloads: 4535

Open Access References How to cite this article

References

Ainsworth, S. (2006). DeFT: A conceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations. Learning and Instruction, 16(3), 183-198. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.03.001
Arcavi, A. (2003). The role of visual representations in the learning of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 52(3), 215-241. doi: 10.1023/A:1024312321077.
Barrow, R and Woods, R. G. (1987). An Introduction to the philosophy of education. London: Methuen.
Battista, M.T. (1999). Geometry Results From The Third International Mathematics And Science Study. Teaching Children Mathematics, 5(6), 367-373.Reston, VA: NCTM.
Chang, C. Y. (2004). Could a laptop computer plus the liquid crystal display projector amount to improved multimedia geoscience instruction ? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20(1), 4-10.
Cifarelli, V. V. (1998). The development of mental representations as a problem solving activity. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 17(2), 239-264.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale,NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Davis, L.L. (1992). Instrument review: Getting the most from a panel of experts. Applied Nursing Research, 5, 194–197.
Diković, L. (2009).Applications GeoGebra into Teaching Some Topics of Mathematics at the College Level, ComSIS, 6(2), 192.
Dogan, M., & Içel, R. (2011). The role of dynamic geometry software in the process of learning: GeoGebra example about triangles. International Journal of Human Sciences. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0364-0213(99)80061-5
Dolbilin, N. (2004). Geometry in Russian Schools: Traditions of Past and State in Present. In H. Fujita, Y. Hashimoto, B. Hodgson, P. Lee, S. Lerman & T. Sawada (Eds.), Proceedings of the Ninth International Congress on Mathematical Education (pp. 118-120): Springer Netherlands.
Eisner, E. (2004). Preparing for today and tomorrow. Educational Leadership, 61(4), 6–10.
Fahlberg-Stojanovska, L., & Stojanovski, V. (2009). GeoGebra -- freedom to explore and learn. Teaching Mathematics and its Applications, 28(2), 69-76. doi: 10.1093/teamat/hrp003.
Funkhouser, C. (2003). The effects of computer-augmented geometry instruction on student performance and attitudes. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 35(2), 163-175.
Global E-Schools and Communities Initiative. ( n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.gesci.org/india
Goldin, G. A. (1992). Meta-Analysis of Problem-Solving Studies: A Critical Response. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23(3), 274-283.
Grandgenett, N. F. (2008). Perhaps a matter of imagination: TPCK in mathematics education. In American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education (Ed.), Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge for educators. UK: Routledge.
Guven, B. (2012). Using Dynamic Geometry Software to Improve Eight Grade Students' Understanding of Transformation Geometry. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(2), 364-382.
Hakkarainen, K., Ilomaki, L., Lipponen, L., Muukkonen, H., & Rahikainen, M. (2000). Students‘ skills and practices of using ICT : Results of a national assessment in Finland. Computers and Education, 34(2), 103-117.
Higgins S. (2003). Does ICT Improve Learning and Teaching? British Educational Research Association. Nottingham
Hodanbosi, C. L. (2001). A Comparison of the Effects of Using a Dynamic Geometry Software Program and Construction Tools on Learner Achievement. Unpublished Ph.D., Kent State University, United States - Ohio.
Hohenwarter, M., Jarvis, D., & Lavicza, Z. (2009). Linking Geometry, Algebra and Mathematics Teachers: GeoGebra Software and the Establishment of the International GeoGebra Institute. International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education, 16(2), 83-87.
Hwang, W.-Y., & Hu, S.-S. (2013). Analysis of peer learning behaviors using multiple representations in virtual reality and their impacts on geometry problem solving. Computers & Education, 62(0), 308-319. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.005
Idris, N. (2006). Teaching and Learning of Mathematics: Making Sense and Developing Cognitives Ability. Kuala Lumpur: Utusan Publications & Distributors Sdn. Bhd.
InfoDev.(2010). ICT in School Education (Primary and Secondary).Retrieved from http://www.infodev.org/infodevfiles/resource/InfodevDocuments_1016.pdf
Iranzo, N., & Fortuny, J. (2011). Influence of Geogebra on Problem Solving Strategies. In L. Bu & R. Schoen (Eds.), Model-Centered Learning (Vol. 6, pp. 91-103): SensePublishers.
Leung, F. K. S. (2006). The Impact of Information and Communication Technology on Our Understanding of the Nature of Mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 26(1), 29-35. doi: 10.2307/40248521.
Mammana, C. and Villani, V. (eds.) (1998) Perspectives on the Teaching of Geometry for the 21st Century, An ICMI Study. The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Ministry of Human Resource Development.(n.d.). ICT@ schools. Retrieved from http://mhrd.gov.in/ict_school
Mousoulides, N. (2011). Geogebra as a Conceptual Tool for Modeling Real World Problems. In L. Bu & R. Schoen (Eds.), Model-Centered Learning (Vol. 6, pp. 105-118): SensePublishers.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
National Curriculum Framework (NCF). (2005). New Delhi: National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT).
Okafor, C. F., & Anaduaka, U. S. (2013). Nigerian School Children and Mathematics Phobia: How the Mathematics Teacher Can Help. American Journal of Educational Research, 1(7), 247-251. doi: 10.12691/education-1-7-5
Pandiscio, E.A. (2002). Exploring the link between preservice teachers‘ conception of proof and the use of dynamic geometry software. School Science and Mathematics, 102(5), 216-221.
Pierce, R., & Stacey, K. (2011). Using Dynamic Geometry to Bring the Real World Into the Classroom. In L. Bu & R. Schoen (Eds.), Model-Centered Learning (Vol. 6, pp. 41- 55): SensePublishers.
Pilli, O., & Aksu, M. (2013). The effects of computer-assisted instruction on the achievement, attitudes and retention of fourth grade mathematics students in North Cyprus. Computers & Education, 62, 62-71.
Polya, G., (1957). How To Solve It. Second Edition Dü. New Jersey: Nj: Princeton University.
Rajesh,M.(2003). A Study of the problems associated with ICT adaptability in Developing Countries in the context of Distance Education. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 4(2).
Reisa, Z. A. (2010). Computer supported mathematics with Geogebra. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 1449- 1455. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.348
Saha, R. A., Ayub, A. F. M., & Tarmizi, R. A. (2010). The Effects of GeoGebra on Mathematics Achievement: Enlightening Coordinate Geometry Learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 8, 686-693.
Sangwin, C. (2007).A brief review of GeoGebra: Dynamic mathematics. MSOR Connections 7(2), 36-38.
Shadaan, P., & Eu, L. K. (2013). Effectiveness of Using Geogebra on Students' Understanding in Learning Circles. The Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 1(4), 1-11.
Stylianou, D. A. (2002). On the interaction of visualization and analysis: the negotiation of a visual representation in expert problem solving. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 21(3), 303-317. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0732-3123(02)00131-1
Thomas,F.,Haddon,L.,Gilligan,R.,Heinzmann,P & de Gournay,C.(2005)Cultural Factors Shapingthe Experience of ICTs: An Exploratory Review In Haddon, L. (Ed.) International Collaborative Research. Crosscultural Differences and Cultures of Research, COST, Brussels.
Vaidyanathan,R(2012, Janauary 1). Is 2012 the year for India's internet? BBC news. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.com/news/business-16354076.
Voutsina, C. (2012). A micro-developmental approach to studying young children's problem solving behavior in addition. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 31(3), 366- 381. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2012.03.002
Waxman, H. C., Connell, M. L., & Gray, J. (2002). A quantitative synthesis of recent research on the effects of teaching and learning with technology on student outcomes. Naperville, IL: North Central Regional Educational Laboratory (NCREL).
Zengin, Y., Furkan, H., & Kutluca, T. (2012). The effect of dynamic mathematics software geogebra on student achievement in teaching of trigonometry. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31(0), 183-187.

How to cite this article

APA

Bhagat, K. K., & Chang, C.-Y. (2015). Incorporating GeoGebra into Geometry Learning-A lesson from India. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(1), 77-86. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1307a

Vancouver

Bhagat KK, Chang CY. Incorporating GeoGebra into Geometry Learning-A lesson from India. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2015;11(1):77-86. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1307a

AMA

Bhagat KK, Chang CY. Incorporating GeoGebra into Geometry Learning-A lesson from India. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2015;11(1), 77-86. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1307a

Chicago

Bhagat, Kaushal Kumar, and Chun-Yen Chang. "Incorporating GeoGebra into Geometry Learning-A lesson from India". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2015 11 no. 1 (2015): 77-86. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1307a

Harvard

Bhagat, K. K., and Chang, C.-Y. (2015). Incorporating GeoGebra into Geometry Learning-A lesson from India. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(1), pp. 77-86. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1307a

MLA

Bhagat, Kaushal Kumar et al. "Incorporating GeoGebra into Geometry Learning-A lesson from India". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 11, no. 1, 2015, pp. 77-86. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1307a