Learning first-year mathematics fully online: Were students prepared, how did they respond?

Wilmari Morton; Rina Durandt

doi:10.29333/ejmste/13189

Full Text (PDF)

Wilmari Morton ¹ ^* , Rina Durandt ¹

More Detail

¹ Department of Mathematics and Applied Mathematics, Faculty of Science, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, SOUTH AFRICA^* Corresponding Author

Abstract

This paper reports on empirical results from a study that investigated first-year mathematics students’ preparedness for, and response to, online learning. With the appearance of COVID-19 in 2020, lecturers were forced to make sudden changes to the established face-to-face learning environments, and students were expected to adapt to these changes. The idea of a blended learning environment is not new, and students globally have demanded flexibility in mathematics learning environments for some time. However, the idea of a sudden change in environments, particularly to fully online, was new to most lecturers and students. Key aspects in an online environment are students’ ability to self-regulate their learning, and the availability and accessibility of technological resources. Quantitative data from the self-developed questionnaire were collected early in 2021, at a public university in South Africa, from a large sample over several modules. Results indicate students are partially prepared for learning fully online, with significant effect on performance.

Keywords

COVID-19
first-year mathematics students
online learning
performance
self-regulated learning
technological resources
tertiary education

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Research Article

EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed, 2023, Volume 19, Issue 6, Article No: em2272

https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13189

Publication date: 01 Jun 2023

Online publication date: 12 Apr 2023

Article Views: 916

Article Downloads: 566

Open Access References How to cite this article

References

Acosta-Gonzaga, E., & Walet, N. R. (2017). The role of attitudinal factors in mathematical on-line assessments: A study of undergraduate STEM students. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(5), 710-726. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1401976
Biggs, J. (1999). What the student does: Teaching for enhanced learning. Higher Education Research and Development, 18(1), 57-75. https://doi.org/10.1080/0729436990180105
Borba, M. C. (2021). The future of mathematics education since COVID-19: Humans-with-media or humans-with-non-living-things. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 108(1), 385-400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10043-2
Borba, M. C., & Villareal, M. E. (2005). Humans-with-media and the reorganization of mathematical thinking: Information and communication technologies, modeling, experimentation and visualization. Springer.
Borba, M. C., Askar, P., Engelbrecht, J., Gadanidis, G., Llinares, S. & Sánchez-Aguilar, M. (2016). Blended learning, e-learning and mobile learning in mathematics education. ZDM Mathematics Education, 48, 589-610. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-016-0798-4
Callaghan, R., Joubert, J., & Engelbrecht, J. (2022). Using enaction to evolve from pre-COVID to post-COVID pedagogy: A case study with South African mathematics teachers. ZDM Mathematics Education, 55, 193-206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-022-01416-9
Chirinda, B., Ndlovu, M., & Spangenberg, E. (2021). Teaching mathematics during the COVID-19 lockdown in a context of historical disadvantage. Education Sciences, 11(4), 177. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11040177
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE.
Dillman, D. A. (2000). Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method. John Wiley and Sons.
Drijvers, P., Kieran, C., & Mariotti, M.-A. (2009). Integrating technology into mathematics education: Theoretical perspectives. In C. Hoyles, & J.-B. Lagrange (Eds.), Mathematics education and technology: Rethinking the terrain (pp. 89-132). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0146-0_7
Durandt, R., Herbst, S., & Seloane, M. (2022). Teaching and learning first-year engineering mathematics over a distance: A critical view over two consecutive years. Perspectives in Education, 40(1), 143-163. https://doi.org/10.18820/2519593X/pie.v40.i1.9
Engelbrecht, J., Borba, M. C., & Kaiser, G. (2023). Will we ever teach mathematics again in the way we used to before the pandemic? ZDM Mathematics Education, 55, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-022-01460-5
Engelbrecht, J., Borba, M. C., Llinares, S., & Kaiser, G. (2020a). Will 2020 be remembered as the year in which education was changed? ZDM Mathematics Education, 52(5), 821-824. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01185-3
Engelbrecht, J., Llinares, S., & Borba, M. C. (2020b). Transformation of the mathematics classroom with the internet. ZDM Mathematics Education, 52, 825-841. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01176-4
Fisher, R. A. (1918). The correlation between relatives on the supposition of mendelian inheritance. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 52(2), 399-433. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0080456800012163
Han, H. (2020). How to make the switch to online teaching more effective. University World News. https://www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=2020031713474546
Healy, L., Jahn, A. P., & Frant, J. B. (2010). Digital technologies and the challenge of constructing an inclusive school mathematics. ZDM Mathematics Education, 42(3), 393-404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-010-0252-y
Kamanetz, A. (2020). ‘Panic-gogy’: Teaching online classes during the coronavirus pandemic. NPR. https://www.npr.org/2020/03/19/817885991/panic-gogy-teaching-online-classes-during-the-coronavirus-pandemic
Kruskal, W. H. & Wallis, W. A. (1952). Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 47(260), 583-621. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1952.10483441
Laborde, C. (2007) The role and uses of technologies in mathematics classrooms: Between challenge and modus vivendi. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 7(1), 68-92. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926150709556721
Laurillard, D. (2013). Rethinking university teaching: A conversational framework for the effective use of learning technologies. Routledge.
Levene, H. (1960). Robust tests for equality of variances. In I. Olkin, S. G. Ghurye, W. Hoeffding, W. G. Madow, & H. B. Mann (Eds.), Contributions to probability and statistics: Essays in honor of Harold hoteling (pp. 278-292). Stanford University Press.
Louw, A. (2021). Large faculty support for teaching online. In Teaching innovation for the 21^st century: A collection of UJ teaching and learning vignettes (pp. 1-3). University of Johannesburg.
Mann, H. B. & Whitney, D. R. (1947). On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically larger than the other. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 18(1), 50-60. https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177730491
Parekh, A. (2021). Introduction. In Teaching innovation for the 21^st century: A collection of UJ teaching and learning vignettes (pp. 1-3). University of Johannesburg.
Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451-502). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50043-3
QA Report. (2020). QA report on the transition to remote teaching and learning. Division for Academic Planning, Quality Promotion and Academic Staff Development. https://www.uj.ac
Quinn, D., & Aaräo, J. (2020). Blended learning in first year engineering mathematics. ZDM Mathematics Education, 15(5), 927-941. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01160-y
Reddy, V., Winnaar, L., Juan, A., Arends, F., Harvey, J., Hannan, S., Namome, C., Sekhejane, P., & Zulu, N. (2020). TIMSS 2019: Highlights of South African grade 9 results in mathematics and science. Achievement and achievement gaps. Department of Basic Education. https://www.timss-sa.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/TIMSS-2019_Grade9_HSRC_FinalReport_2021.pdf
Satterthwaite, F. E. (1946). An approximate distribution of estimates of variance components. Biometrics Bulletin, 2(6), 110-114. https://doi.org/10.2307/3002019
Šidàk, Z. (1967). Rectangular confidence region for the means of multivariate normal distributions. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 62(318), 626-633. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1967.10482935
StataCorp. (2021). Stata statistical software: Release 17. StataCorp LLC. https://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/citing-software-documentation-faqs/
Tanur, J. M. (1983). Methods for large-scale surveys and experiments. Sociological Methodology, 14, 1-71. https://doi.org/10.2307/270902
Trenholm, S., Alcock, L., & Robinson, C. (2016). Brief report: The instructor experience of fully online tertiary mathematics: A challenge and an opportunity. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 47(2), 147-161. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.47.2.0147
Trenholm, S., Alcock, L., & Robinson, C. L. (2012). Mathematics lecturing in the digital age. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 43(6), 703-716. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2011.646325
Trigwell, K., & Prosser, M. (1997). Towards an understanding of individual acts of teaching and learning. Higher Education Research & Development, 16(2), 241-252. https://doi.org/10.1080/0729436970160210
Watkins, D., & Hattie, J. (1985). A longitudinal study of the approaches to learning of Australian tertiary students. Human Learning: Journal of Practical Research & Applications, 4(2), 127-141.
Wilcoxon, F. (1945). Individual comparisons by ranking methods. Biometrics Bulletin, 1(6), 80-83. https://doi.org/10.2307/3001968

How to cite this article

APA

Morton, W., & Durandt, R. (2023). Learning first-year mathematics fully online: Were students prepared, how did they respond?. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(6), em2272. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13189

Vancouver

Morton W, Durandt R. Learning first-year mathematics fully online: Were students prepared, how did they respond?. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2023;19(6):em2272. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13189

AMA

Morton W, Durandt R. Learning first-year mathematics fully online: Were students prepared, how did they respond?. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2023;19(6), em2272. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13189

Chicago

Morton, Wilmari, and Rina Durandt. "Learning first-year mathematics fully online: Were students prepared, how did they respond?". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2023 19 no. 6 (2023): em2272. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13189

Harvard

Morton, W., and Durandt, R. (2023). Learning first-year mathematics fully online: Were students prepared, how did they respond?. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(6), em2272. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13189

MLA

Morton, Wilmari et al. "Learning first-year mathematics fully online: Were students prepared, how did they respond?". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 19, no. 6, 2023, em2272. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13189