Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

• Anderson, K. A., Crespi, M., & Sayre, E. C. (2017). Linking behavior in the physics education research co-authorship network. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 13, 010121. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.13.010121
• Bitzenbauer, P. (2021). Quantum physics education research over the last two decades: A bibliometric analysis. Education Sciences, 11(11), 699. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11110699
• Blonder, R., & Sakhnini, S. (2012). Teaching two basic nanotechnology concepts in secondary school by using a variety of teaching methods. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 13, 500-516. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2rp20026k
• Bryan, L. A., Daly, S., Hutchinson, K., Sederberg, D., Benaissa, F., & Giordano, N. (2007). A design-based approach to the professional development of teachers in nanoscale science [Paper presentation]. Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1515/ntrev-2014-0029
• Bryan, L. A., Magana, A. J., & Sederberg, D. (2015). Published research on pre-college students’ and teachers’ nanoscale science, engineering, and technology learning. Nanotechnology Reviews, 4(1), 7-32.
• Chen, T.-L., Sheen, H.-J., Yueh, H.-P, Chiang, F. K., & Chang, P.-W. (2012). Designing nano-biotechnology summer camp with experiential learning theory. International Journal of Engineering Education, 28(5), 1078-1087.
• Chopra, N., & Reddy, R. G. (2012). Undergraduate education in nanotechnology and nanoscience. JOM, 64, 1127-1129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-012-0450-x
• Chua, K.-H., & Karpudewan, M. (2020). Integrating nanoscience activities in enhancing Malaysian secondary school students’ understanding of chemistry concepts. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(1), em1801. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/110781
• Claville, M., Babu, S., Boonthum-Denecke, C., Fowlks, E., Hill, E., Lowe, C., Parker, B., Penn-Marshall, M., Ramdon, R., & Wallace, B (2019). NanoHU: A boundary-spanning education model for maximizing human and intellectual capital. Proceeding of the ACS Symposium Series, 1328, 83-102. https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-2019-1328.ch006
• da Silva, D., de Melo, F., Silveira, A., da Cruz, B., Prado, C., da Vasconcelos, L., Lucas, V., & Toma, H. (2016). Introducing environmental and sustainable chemistry topics using a nanotechnology approach: Removing hazardous metal ions by means of huic-acid-modified superparamagnetic nanoparticles. Journal of Chemical Education, 93(11), 1929-1934. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00172
• Daly, S., & Bryan, L. (2007). Models of nanoscale phenomena as tools for engineering design and science inquiry. In Proceedings of the 2007 Annual Conference & Exposition. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--2413
• Daly, S., Hutchinson, K., & Bryan, L. (2007). Incorporating nanoscale science and engineering concepts into middle and high school curricula. In Proceedings of the 2007 Annual Conference & Exposition. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--2416
• Delgado, C., Stevens, S. Y., Shin, N., & Krajcik, J. (2015). A middle school instructional unit for size and scale contextualized in nanotechnology. Nanotechnology Reviews, 4(1), 51-69. https://doi.org/10.1515/ntrev-2014-0023
• Dengel, A., & Mägdefrau, J. (2018). Immersive learning explored: Subjective and objective factors influencing learning outcomes in immersive educational virtual environments. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering (pp. 608-615). https://doi.org/10.1109/TALE.2018.8615281
• Dori, Y., Dangur, V., Avargil, S., & Peskin, U. (2014). Assessing advanced high school and undergraduate students’ thinking skills: The chemistry–From the nanoscale to microelectronics module. Journal of Chemical Education, 91(9), 1306-1317. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed500007s
• Erdmann, T., Kapitola, S., & Avsar, C. (2019). Implementation of a satellite operations student project in the multi-mission context at TU Berlin. In Proceeding of the International Astronautical Congress.
• Ernst, J. V. (2009). Nanotechnology education: Contemporary content and approaches. Journal of Technology Studies, 35(1), 3-8. https://doi.org/10.21061/jots.v35i1.a.1
• Favero, G., Brugia, M. Mancin, F., & Bonomi, R. (2019). Synthesis, purification, and characterization of negatively charged gold nanoparticles for cation sensing. Journal of Chemical Education, 96, 2292-2299. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b00179
• Friend, R. D., & Beneat, J. N. (2013). Development of aerospace engineering-focused undergraduate research at a small university: Accomplishments and lessons learned. In Proceeding of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--19440
• Gardner, G. E., & Jones, M. G. (2009). Bacteria buster: Testing antibiotic properties of silver nanoparticles. The American Biology Teacher, 71(4), 231-234. https://doi.org/10.2307/27669416
• Gericke, N., Hogstrom, P., & Wallin, J. (2022). A systematic review of research on laboratory work in secondary school. Studies in Science Education, 59(2), 245-285. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2022.2090125
• Ghattas, N. I., & Carver, J. S. (2012). Integrating nanotechnology into school education: A review of the literature. Research in Science & Technological Education, 30(3), 271-284. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2012.732058
• Guasch, B., Gonzalez, M., & Cortinas, S. (2020). Educational toolkit based on design methodologies to promote scientific knowledge transfer in secondary schools: A graphene-centered case study. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 10(1), 17-31. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.787
• Healy, N., & Rathbun, L. (2008). Research experience for undergraduates in nanotechnology: Analysis of participants 1997-2007. In Proceeding of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--4447
• Hingant, B., & Albe, V. (2010). Nano-sciences and nanotechnologies learning and teaching in secondary education: A review of literature. Studies in Science Education, 46(2), 121-152. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2010.504543
• Ho, S., Scheufele, D., & Corley, E. (2010). Making sense of policy choices: Understanding the roles of value predispositions, mass media, and cognitive processing in public attitudes toward nanotechnology. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 12(8), 2703-2715. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-010-0038-8
• Hudson-Smith, N. V., Cahill, M. S., Klein, N. D., Krause, M. O. P., & Haynes, C. L. (2019). A macroscale model for hands-on activities demonstrating transmission electron microscopy. Journal of Chemical Education, 96, 1377-1382. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.8b01059
• Hutchinson, K., Bryan, L., & Bodner, G. (2009). Supporting secondary teachers as they implement new science and engineering curricula: Case examples from nanoscale science and engineering education. In Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--5700
• Jones, M. G., Andre, T., Superfine, R., & Taylor, R. (2003). Learning at the nanoscale: The impact of students’ use of remote microscopy on concepts of viruses, scale and microscopy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 303-322. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10078
• Jones, M. G., Blonder, R., Gardner, G. E., Albe, V., Falvo, M., & Chevrier, J. (2013). Nanotechnology and nanoscale science: Educational challenges. Journal of International Science Education, 35(9), 1490-1512. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.771828
• Jones, M. G., Gardner, G. E., Falvo, M., & Taylor, A. (2015). Precollege nanotechnology education: A different kind of thinking. Nanotechnology Reviews, 4(1), 117-127. https://doi.org/10.1515/ntrev-2014-0014
• Jones, M. G., Minogue, J., Tretter, T., Neigishi, A., & Taylor, R. (2006). Haptic augmentation of science instruction: Does touch matter? Science Education, 90, 111-123. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20086
• Jones, M. G., Tretter, T., Taylor, A., & Oppewal, T. (2008). Experienced and novice teachers’ concepts of spatial scale. International Journal of Science Education, 30(3), 409-429. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701416624
• Jones, M. G., Andre, T., Kubasko, D., Bokinsky, A., Tretter, T., Negishi, A., Taylor, R., & Superfine, R. (2004). Remote atomic force microscopy of microscopic organisms: Technological innovations for hands-on science with middle and high school students. Science Education, 88, 55-71. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10112
• Kong, Y., Douglas, K., Rodgers, K., Diefes-Dux, H., & Madhavan, K. (2017). A size and scale framework for guiding curriculum design and assessment. Journal of Engineering Education, 106(3), 431-453. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20172
• Krijtenburg-Lewerissa, K., Pol, H. J., Brinkman, A., & van Joolingen, W. R. (2017). Insights into teaching quantum mechanics in secondary and lower undergraduate education. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 13, 010109. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.13.010109
• LeBlanc, S. (2018). Nanotechnology fellows program: Integrating interdisciplinary education, professional development, and outreach. In Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--30831
• Lin, S.-F., & Lin, H. (2016). Learning nanotechnology with texts and comics: The impacts on students of different achievement levels. International Journal of Science Education, 38(8), 1373-1391. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1191089
• Lindell, R. S., Peak, E., & Foster, T. M. (2007). Are they all created equal? A comparison of different concept inventory development methodologies. AIP Conference Proceedings, 883(1), 14-17. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2508680
• Luo, S., Gan, J. S., Loh, A. P., Ee, E. W. H., & Soh, E. K. (2019). Evaluating student academic motivations in one-year CubeSat project using 3x2 achievement goal framework. In Proceeding of the IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Education. https://doi.org/10.1109/TALE48000.2019.9225992
• Magana, A., Brophy, S., & Bryan, L. (2012). An integrated knowledge framework to characterize and scaffold size and scale cognition (FS2C). International Journal of Science Education, 34(14), 2181-2203. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.715316
• Manou, L., Spyrtou, A., Hatzikraniotis, E., & Kariotoglou, P. (2021). What does “nanoscience–nanotechnology” mean to primary school teachers? International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 20, 1169-1290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-021-10199-6
• Moraes, C. (2012). Pop culture: A soap bubble-based framework for nano-education outreach. International Journal of Engineering Education, 28(5), 1088-1094.
• Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M, Boutron, I., Hoffman, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hrobjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., …, & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2000 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, 71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
• Panyala, N., Pena-Mendez, E., & Havel, J. (2009). Gold and nano-gold in medicine: Overview, toxicology and perspectives. Journal of Applied Biomedicine, 7, 75-91. https://doi.org/10.32725/jab.2009.008
• Peikos, G., Spyrtou, A., Pnevmatikos, D., & Papadopoulou, P. (2020). Nanoscale science and technology education: Primary school students’ preconceptions of the lotus effect and the concept of size. Research in Science & Technological Education, 41(1), 89-106. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2020.1841149
• Peng, X., Isaac, B., & Wilkins, R. T. (2012). Development of nanoscale virtual reality simulations for the teaching of nanotechnology. In Proceeding of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--21221
• Petros, R., & di Simone, J. (2010). Strategies in the design of nanoparticles for therapeutic applications. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 9, 615-627. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd2591
• Pincheira, N., & Alsina, A. (2022). Teachers’ mathematics knowledge for teaching early algebra: A systematic review from the MKT perspective. Mathematics, 15(10), 2590. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9202590
• Rethlefsen, M., Kirtley, S., Waffenschmidt, S., Ayala, A., Moher, D., Page, M., & Koffel, J. (2021). PRISMA-S: An extension to the PRISMA statement for reporting literature searchers in systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews, 10, 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-01542-z
• Sahin, N., & Ekli, E. (2013). Nanotechnology awareness, opinions and risk perceptions among middle school students. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23, 867-881. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-013-9233-0
• Schneider, E. M., Bartsch, A., Stark, W. J., & Grass, R. N. (2019). Safe one-pot synthesis of fluorescent carbon quantum dots from lemon juice for a hands-on experience of nanotechnology. Journal of Chemical Education, 96, 540-545. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.8b00114
• Schönborn, K. J., Höst, G. E., & Lundin Palmerius, K. E. (2015). Measuring understanding of nanoscience and nanotechnology: Development and validation of the nano-knowledge instrument (NanoKI). Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16, 346-354. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RP00241E
• Schwierz, F. (2010). Graphene transistors. Nature Nanotechnology, 5, 487-496. https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2010.89
• Senocak, E., Ozdemir, T., Yilmaz, F., Tayhan, Y., & McNally, H. A. (2021). A nanoscience and nanotechnology educational program for high school students: Examination of preliminary trials. Journal of Materials Education, 43(1-2), 93-108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43683-021-00053-0
• Sharpe, E., & Andreescu, S. (2015). Integration of nanoparticle-based paper sensors into the classroom: An example of application for rapid colorimetric analysis of antioxidants. Journal of Chemical Education, 92(5), 886-891. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed400851m
• Sibgatullin, I., Korzhuev, A., Khairullina, E., Sadykova, A., Baturina, R., & Chauzova, V. (2022). A systematic review on algebraic thinking in education. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(1), em2065. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11486
• Sripongwiwat, S., Bunterm, T., Srisawat, N., & Tang, K. N. (2016). The constructionism and neurocognitive-based teaching model for promoting science learning outcomes and creative thinking. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 17(2), 9.
• Tarng, W, Liu, C.-L., Lee, C.-Y., Lin, C.-M., & Yun-Chen L. (2018). A virtual laboratory for learning fullerene production and nanostructure analysis. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 27, 472-484. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22089
• Tirre, F., Kampschulte, L., Thoma, G.-B, Höffler, T., & Parchmann, I. (2018). Design of a student lab program for nanoscience and technology–An intervention study on students’ perceptions of the nature of science, the nature of scientists and the nature of scientific inquiry. Research in Science & Technological Education, 37(4), 393-418. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2018.1551201
• Tomasik, J., Jin, S., Hamers, R., & Moore, J. (2009). Design and initial evaluation of an online nanoscience course for teachers. Journal of Nano Education, 1, 48-69. https://doi.org/10.1166/jne.2009.003
• Tretter, T. (2006). Conceptualizing nanoscale. Science Teacher, 73(9), 49-53.
• Tretter, T. (2015). Instructional impact on high school physics students’ nanoscience conceptions. Nanotechnology Reviews, 4(1), 33-50. https://doi.org/10.1515/ntrev-2014-0015
• Wagner, H. D. (2007). Nanocomposites: Paving the way to stronger materials. Nature Nanotechnology, 2, 742-744. https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2007.401
• Yayon, M., Mamlok-Naaman, R., & Fortus, D. (2012). Characterizing and representing student’s conceptual knowledge of chemical bonding. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 13, 248-267. https://doi.org/10.1039/C0RP90019B
• Zenger, T., & Bitzenbauer, P. (2022). Exploring German secondary school students' conceptual knowledge of density. Science Education International, 33(1), 86-92.

APA

Schmid, J. M., Veith, J. M., Truong, M. H., Straulino, M., Winkler, B., Hennig, F., & Bitzenbauer, P. (2023). Nanoscience and -technology in secondary education: A systematic literature review. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(12), em2361. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13834

Vancouver

Schmid JM, Veith JM, Truong MH, Straulino M, Winkler B, Hennig F, et al. Nanoscience and -technology in secondary education: A systematic literature review. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2023;19(12):em2361. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13834

AMA

Schmid JM, Veith JM, Truong MH, et al. Nanoscience and -technology in secondary education: A systematic literature review. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2023;19(12), em2361. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13834

Chicago

Schmid, Judith Maria, Joaquin Marc Veith, My Hanh Truong, Michael Straulino, Bianca Winkler, Fabian Hennig, and Philipp Bitzenbauer. "Nanoscience and -technology in secondary education: A systematic literature review". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2023 19 no. 12 (2023): em2361. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13834

Harvard

Schmid, J. M., Veith, J. M., Truong, M. H., Straulino, M., Winkler, B., Hennig, F., and Bitzenbauer, P. (2023). Nanoscience and -technology in secondary education: A systematic literature review. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(12), em2361. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13834

MLA

Schmid, Judith Maria et al. "Nanoscience and -technology in secondary education: A systematic literature review". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 19, no. 12, 2023, em2361. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13834