Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

• Abrahams, I., & Reiss, M. (2012). Practical Work: its effectiveness in primary and secondary schools in England. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(8), 1035-1055.
• Alias, N., DeWitt, D., & Siraj, S. (2013). Development of science pedagogical module based on technology and learning styles. Kuala Lumpur: Pearson Malaysia.
• Aronson, N., & Arfstrom, K. M. (2013). Flipped learning in higher education. Retrieved from http://www.flippedlearning.org/cms/lib07/VA01923112/Centricity/Domain/41/HigherEdWhitePaper%20FINAL.pdf.
• Asadullin, R. M., Teregulov, F. Sh., Koletvinova, N. D., & Egamberdieva, N. M. (2016). Fundamental and Applied Education - A New Look. IEJME -Mathematics Education, 11(1), 23-33.
• Baker, J. W. (2000). The “Classroom Flip”: Using web course management tools to become the guide by the side. Selected Papers from the 11th International Conference on College Teaching and Learning (pp. 9–17).
• Chiou, C., Lee, L., Tien, L., & Wang, Y. (2017).Analyzing the Effects of various Concept Mapping Techniques on Learning Achievement under different Learning Styles. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(7), 3687-3708.
• Demirel, M., & Turan, M. (2010). The effects of problem based learning on achievement, attitude, metacognitive awareness and motivation. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 38, 55-66.
• Ding, M., Li, X., Piccolo, D., & Kulm, G. (2007). Teacher interventions in cooperative-learning mathematics classes. Journal of Educational Research, 100(3), 162-175.
• Erath, K., & Prediger, S. (2014). Mathematical practices as underdetermined learning goals: The case of explaining diagrams. Proceedings of the Joint Meeting 3 - 17 of PME 38 and PME-NA, 36(3), 17-24).
• European Commission for Education and Culture, 2014.Website of the European Commission for Education and Culture. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/education_culture.
• Gorev, P. M. (2015). The innovative activity of the educational institution as one of the conditions of of improving the quality of education. Concept, 07. ART 15233. Retrieved from http://e-koncept.ru/2015/15233.htm.
• Gorev, P. M., & Rychkova, O. V. (2015). Open type tasks in mathematics as a tool for students’ meta-subject results assessment. Concept, 05. ART 15132. Retrieved from http://e-koncept.ru/2015/15132.htm.
• Gorev, P. M., Masalimova, A. R., Mukhametzyanova, F. S., & Makarova, E. V. (2017).Developing Creativity of Schoolchildren through the Course “Developmental Mathematics”. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(6), 1799-1815.
• Government of the Russian Federation. (2014). RF Government Resolution of April 15, 2014 № 295 “On approval of the Russian State Program “Development of Education for 2013-2020”.
• Herreid, C. F., & Schiller, N. A. (2013). Case studies and the flipped classroom. Journal of College Science Teaching, 42(5), 62–66.
• Horizon Report Europe. (2014). Schools Edition. Publications Office of the European Union, &Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.
• Hwang, G. J., Lai, C. L., & Wang, S. Y. J. (2015) Seamless flipped learning: a mobile technology-enhanced flipped classroom with effective learning strategies. Journal of Computers in Education, 449. doi:10.1007/s40692-015-0043-0.
• Kiryakova, A. V., Tretiakov, A. N., Kolga, V. V., Piralova, O. F., & Dzhamalova, B. B. (2016). Experimental Study of the Effectiveness of College Students’ Vocational Training in Conditions of Social Partnership. IEJME -Mathematics Education, 11(3), 457-466.
• Lamanauskas, V., & Augienė, D. (2015). Development of scientific research activity in university: A position of the experts. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 167, 131-140.
• Limniou, M., Schermbrucker, I., & Lyons,M. (2017). Traditional and flipped classroom approaches delivered by two different teachers: the student perspective. Education and Information Technologies, 1-21. doi:10.1007/s10639-017-9636-8.
• Liu, H. K. (2016). Correlation Research on the Application of E-Learning to Students’ Self-Regulated Learning Ability, Motivational Beliefs, and Academic Performance. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(4), 1091-1100.
• Ng, W. (2015) Technology Integration and the Flipped Classroom. New Digital Technology in Education, Cham. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-05822-1_7.
• Official Microsoft channel in Russia. (2015). What is the school of the future like? Retrieved from https://youtu.be/_hnm9pQ1Rnc.
• Open University UK. (2015). Website of the Open University UK. Retrieved from http://www.open.ac.uk.
• Pelgrum, W. J. (2001). Obstacles to the integration of ICT in education: results from a worldwide educational assessment. Computers & Education, 37, 163-178.
• Sharples, M., & Adams, A. (2015).Innovating Pedagogy: Open University. Innovation Report, 4, 1-6.
• Su, C.-H., & Cheng, C.-H. (2015). A mobile gamification learning system for improving the learning motivation and achievements. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 31, 268-286.
• Utemov, V. V. (2016). Innovations in pedagogical experience in general and professional education of the future. Concept, Special issue 01. ART 76004. Retrieved from http://e-koncept.ru/2016/76004.htm.
• Wang, Y.‐H. (2016). Could a mobile‐assisted learning system support flipped classrooms for classical chinese learning? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32(5), 391-415.
• Wu, Y., Lin, Y., Wen, M., Perng, Y., & Hsu, I. (2016). Design, analysis and user acceptance of architectural design education in learning system based on knowledge management theory. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(11), 2835-2849.
• Yarullin, I. F., Prichinin, A. E., & Sharipova, D. Y. (2016). Risk Management of an Education Project. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 11(1), 45-56.

APA

Wang, Z., Utemov, V. V., Krivonozhkina, E. G., Liu, G., & Galushkin, A. A. (2018). Pedagogical Readiness of Mathematics Teachers to Implement Innovative Forms of Educational Activities. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(1), 543-552. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/80613

Vancouver

Wang Z, Utemov VV, Krivonozhkina EG, Liu G, Galushkin AA. Pedagogical Readiness of Mathematics Teachers to Implement Innovative Forms of Educational Activities. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2018;14(1):543-52. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/80613

AMA

Wang Z, Utemov VV, Krivonozhkina EG, Liu G, Galushkin AA. Pedagogical Readiness of Mathematics Teachers to Implement Innovative Forms of Educational Activities. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2018;14(1), 543-552. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/80613

Chicago

Wang, Zeyu, Vyacheslav V. Utemov, Ekaterina G. Krivonozhkina, Gang Liu, and Alexander A. Galushkin. "Pedagogical Readiness of Mathematics Teachers to Implement Innovative Forms of Educational Activities". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2018 14 no. 1 (2018): 543-552. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/80613

Harvard

Wang, Z., Utemov, V. V., Krivonozhkina, E. G., Liu, G., and Galushkin, A. A. (2018). Pedagogical Readiness of Mathematics Teachers to Implement Innovative Forms of Educational Activities. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(1), pp. 543-552. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/80613

MLA

Wang, Zeyu et al. "Pedagogical Readiness of Mathematics Teachers to Implement Innovative Forms of Educational Activities". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 14, no. 1, 2018, pp. 543-552. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/80613