Pre-service Teachers’ Views of Inquiry
Teaching and Their Responses to Teacher
Educators’ Feedback on Teaching Practice

Hye-Gyoung Yoon; Mijung Kim; Byoung Sug Kim; Yong Jae Joung; Young Shin Park

doi:10.12973/eurasia.2013.944a

Pre-service Teachers’ Views of Inquiry Teaching and Their Responses to Teacher Educators’ Feedback on Teaching Practice

Full Text (PDF)

Hye-Gyoung Yoon ¹ ^* , Mijung Kim ², Byoung Sug Kim ³, Yong Jae Joung ⁴, Young Shin Park ⁵

More Detail

¹ Chuncheon National University of Education, SOUTH KOREA² University of Victoria, CANADA³ Roosevelt University, USA⁴ Gongju National University of Education, SOUTH KOREA⁵ Chosun University, SOUTH KOREA^* Corresponding Author

Abstract

This study attempted to explore 15 Korean elementary pre-service teachers’ views of inquiry teaching. During a science teaching methods course, pre-service teachers implemented a peer teaching lesson, had a group discussion to reflect on five teacher educators’ comments on their first peer teaching practice, and revised and re-taught the lesson as a second peer teaching practice. The results indicate that pre-service teachers changed their views of inquiry teaching from following the process of inquiry or a completely unstructured discovery approach to facilitating students’ inquiry learning with instructional guidance. The importance of reflective group discussion and re-teaching a lesson is discussed.

Keywords

pre-service teachers
reflective discussion
inquiry teaching
peer teaching
teacher
educator’s feedback

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Research Article

EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed, 2013, Volume 9, Issue 4, 347-359

https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2013.944a

Publication date: 14 Dec 2013

Article Views: 1933

Article Downloads: 1128

Open Access References How to cite this article

References

Abell, S. K., Bryan, L. A., & Anderson, M. A. (1998). Investigating preservice elementary science teacher reflective thinking: Using integrated media case-based instruction in elementary science teacher preparation. Science Education, 82(4), 491–509.
Anderson, R. D. (2002). Reforming science teaching: What research says about inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(1), 1-12.
Bailey, R., & Garner, M. (2010). Is the feedback in higher education assessment worth the paper it is written on? Teachers’ reflections on their practices. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(2), 187-198.
Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1994). Guided discovery in a community of learners. In K. McGilly (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice (pp. 229-270). Cambridge, MA, US: The MIT Press.
Brown, S. L. & Melear, C. T. (2006). Investigation of secondary science teachers’ beliefs and practices after authentic inquiry-based experiences. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(9), 938–962.
Brown, P. L., Abell, S. K., Demir, A., & Schmidt, F. J. (2006). College science teachers’ views of classroom inquiry. Science Education, 90(5), 784-802.
Chinn, C. A., & Brewer, W. F. (1998). Theories of knowledge acquisition. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (Vol. 1, pp. 97- 113). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Chinn, C. A., & Malhotra, B. (2002). Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Science Education, 86(2), 175- 218.
Clandinin, J., & Connelly, F. M. (1991). Narrative and story in practice and research. In D. Schön (Ed.), The reflective turn (pp. 258-281). New York: Teachers College Press.
Crawford, B. A. (2000). Embracing the essence of inquiry: New roles for science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(9), 916-937.
Crawford, B. A. (2007), Learning to teach science as inquiry in the rough and tumble of practice, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(4), 613-642.
Crawford, B.A., Krajcik, J.S.,&Marx, R.W. (1999). Elements of a community of learners in a middle school science classroom. Science Education, 83(6), 701–723.
de Jong, T., Beishuizenm, J., Hulshof, C., Prins, F., van Rijn, H., van Someren, M., et al. (2005). Determinants of discovery learning in a complex simulation learning environment. In P. Gardenfors & P. Johansson (Eds.), Cognition, education, and communication technology (257-283). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
DeBoer, G. E. (2004). Historical perspective on inquiry teaching in schools. In L. Flick & N. Lederman (Eds.), Scientific inquiry and the nature of science: Implications for teaching, learning, and teacher education (pp. 17–35). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Demir, A. & Abell, S. K. (2010). Views of inquiry: Mismatches between views of science education faculty and students of an alternative certification program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(6), 716-741.
Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84(3), 287-312
Fazio, X. (2009). Development of a community of science teachers: Participation in a collaborative action research project. School Science and Mathematics, 109(2), 95-107.
Hand, B., Wallace, C. S., & Yang, E. M. (2004). Using the science writing heuristic to enhance learning outcomes from laboratory activities in seventh grade science: Quantitative and qualitative aspects. International Journal of Science Education, 26(2), 131–149.
Handelsman, J., Ebert-May, D., Beichner, R., Bruns, P., Chang, A., DeHaan, R., Gentile, J., Lauffer, S., Stewart, J., Tilghman, S. M., & Wood, W. B. (2004). Scientific teaching. Science, 304, 521-522.
Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (2004). The laboratory in science education: Foundation for the 21st century. Science Education, 88(1), 28–54.
Holliday, W. G. (2004). A balanced approach to science inquiry teaching. In L. Flick & N. Lederman (Eds.), Scientific inquiry and the nature of science: Implications for teaching, learning, and teacher education (pp. 201–217). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Howes, E. V. (2002). Learning to teach science for all in the elementary grades: What do preservice teachers bring? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(9), 845 – 869.
Keys, C. W., & Bryan, L. A. (2001). Co-constructing inquirybased science with teachers: Essential research for lasting reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(6), 631-645.
Kielborn, T. L., & Gilmer, P. J. (Eds.) (1999). Meaningful science: Teachers doing inquiry + teaching science. Tallahassee, FL: SERVE.
Kim, M., Tan, A-L., & Talaue, F. (2013). New vision and challenges in inquiry-based curriculum change in Singapore. International Journal of Science Education, 35(2), 289-311.
King, K., Shumow, L., & Lietz, S. (2001). Science education in an urban elementary school: Case studies of teacher beliefs and classroom practices. Science Education, 85(2), 89-110.
Koballa, T. R., Glynn, S. M., Upson, L. & Coleman, D. C. (2005). Conceptions of teaching science held by novice teachers in an alternative certification program. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 16(4), 287–308.
Langer, P. (2011). The use of feedback in education: A complex instructional strategy. Psychological Reports, 109(3), 775-784.
Llewellyn, D. (2001). Inquire within: Implementing inquiry-based science standards. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Luft, J. A. (2001). Changing inquiry practices and beliefs: The impact of an inquiry-based professional development programme on beginning and experienced secondary science teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 23(5), 517-534.
Luft, J. (2009). Beginning secondary science teachers in different induction programmes: The first year of teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 31(17), 2355–2384.
Luttenberg, J., & Bergen, T. (2008). Teacher reflection: the development of a typology. Teachers and Teaching, 14(5-6), 543-566.
Marx, R.W., Blumenfield, P. C., Krajcik, J. S., Blunk, M., Crawford, B. A., & Meyer, K. M. (1994). Enacting project based science: Experiences of four middle grade teachers. Elementary School Journal, 94(5), 517-538.
Pokorny, H., & Pickford, P. (2010). Complexity, cues and relationships: Student perceptions of feedback. Active learning in higher education, 11(1) 21-30.
Mason, L. (2001). Responses to anomalous data on controversial topics and theory change. Learning and Instruction, 11(6), 453-483.
Mattingly, C. (1991). Narrative Reflections on practical actions: Two learning experiments in reflective storytelling. In D. Schön (Ed.), The reflective turn (pp. 235–257). New York; Teachers College Press.
McNeill, K. L., Lizotte, D. J., Krajcik, J., & Marx, R. W. (2006). Supporting students’ construction of scientific explanations by fading scaffolds in instructional materials. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(2), 153 – 191.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis (2nd ed). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Mule, L. (2006). Preservice teachers’ inquiry in a professional development school context: Implications for the practicum. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22(2), 205-128.
Nichols, S. E., Tippins, D., & Wieseman, K. (1997). A toolkit for developing critically reflective science teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 8(2), 77-106.
National Research Council (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy press.
National Research Council (2000). Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Otienoh, R. (2010). Feedback on teachers’ journal entries: A blessing or a curse? Reflective Practice, 11(2), 143–156.
Pajaras, M. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and education research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307–332.
Palmer, D. (2006). Durability of changes in self-efficacy of preservice primary teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 28(6), 655–671.
Pokorny, H., & Pickford, P. (2010) Complexity, cues and relationships: Student perceptions of feedback. Active learning in higher education, 11(1), 21-30.
Posner, G., Strike, K., Hewson, P., & Gertzog, W. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66(2), 211-227.
Reiff, R., Harwood, W., & Phillipson, T. (2002, January). A scientific method based upon research scientists’ conceptions of scientific inquiry. Paper presented at the Association for the Education of Teachers in Science, Charlotte, NC.
Roehrig, G. H., & Luft, J. A. (2006). Does one size fit all? The induction experience of science teachers from different teacher preparation programmes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(9), 963–985.
Sandoval, W. A., & Reiser, B. J. (2004). Explanation-driven inquiry: Integrating conceptual and epistemic scaffolds for scientific inquiry. Science Education, 88(3), 345-372.
Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Schön, D. (1987). Educating the Reflective Practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey- Bass.
Simmons, P. E., Emory, A., Carter, T., Coker, T., Finnegan, B., Crockett, D., Richardson, L., Yager, R., Craven, J., Tillotson, J., Brunkhorst, H., Twiest, M., Hossain, K., Gallagher, J., Duggan-Haas, D., Parker, J., Cajas, F., Alshannag, O., McGlamery, S., Krockover, J., Adams, P., Spector, B., LaPorta, T., James, B., Rearden, K., & Labuda, K. (1999). Beginning teachers: Beliefs and classroom actions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(8), 930 – 954.
Tobin, K. & McRobbie, C. (1997). Beliefs about the nature of science and the enacted science curriculum. Science & Education, 6(4), 355-371.
Tsai, C-C. (2002). Nested epistemologies: Science teachers’ beliefs of teaching, learning and science. International Journal of Science Education, 24(8), 771-783.
White, R., & Gunstone, R. (1992). Probing understanding, London: The Falmer Press.
Yoon, H-G & Kim, M. (2010). Collaborative reflection through dilemma cases of science practical work during practicum. International Journal of Science Education. 32(3), 283-301.
Zeichner, K. (1994). Conceptions of reflective practice in teaching and teacher education. In G. R. Harvard & P. Hodkinson (Eds.), Action and reflection in teacher education (pp. 15–34). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.

How to cite this article

APA

Yoon, H.-G., Kim, M., Kim, B. S., Joung, Y. J., & Park, Y. S. (2013). Pre-service Teachers’ Views of Inquiry Teaching and Their Responses to Teacher Educators’ Feedback on Teaching Practice. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 9(4), 347-359. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2013.944a

Vancouver

Yoon HG, Kim M, Kim BS, Joung YJ, Park YS. Pre-service Teachers’ Views of Inquiry Teaching and Their Responses to Teacher Educators’ Feedback on Teaching Practice. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2013;9(4):347-59. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2013.944a

AMA

Yoon HG, Kim M, Kim BS, Joung YJ, Park YS. Pre-service Teachers’ Views of Inquiry Teaching and Their Responses to Teacher Educators’ Feedback on Teaching Practice. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2013;9(4), 347-359. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2013.944a

Chicago

Yoon, Hye-Gyoung, Mijung Kim, Byoung Sug Kim, Yong Jae Joung, and Young Shin Park. "Pre-service Teachers’ Views of Inquiry Teaching and Their Responses to Teacher Educators’ Feedback on Teaching Practice". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2013 9 no. 4 (2013): 347-359. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2013.944a

Harvard

Yoon, H.-G., Kim, M., Kim, B. S., Joung, Y. J., and Park, Y. S. (2013). Pre-service Teachers’ Views of Inquiry Teaching and Their Responses to Teacher Educators’ Feedback on Teaching Practice. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 9(4), pp. 347-359. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2013.944a

MLA

Yoon, Hye-Gyoung et al. "Pre-service Teachers’ Views of Inquiry Teaching and Their Responses to Teacher Educators’ Feedback on Teaching Practice". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 9, no. 4, 2013, pp. 347-359. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2013.944a