Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

• Anjum, S. (2015). Gender difference in mathematics achievement and its relation with reading comprehension of children at upper primary stage. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(16), 71-75. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1079951.pdf
• Ariyanto, L., Kusumaningsih, W., & Aini, A. N. (2018). Mobile phone application for mathematics learning. In N. Hidayat, M. Rasiman, S. Novita, A. Handayani, A. Buchori (Eds.). Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Education and Social Science Research (ICESRE 2018). Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 983, No. 1, p. 012106). IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/983/1/012106
• Ayieko, R. A., Gokbel, E. N., & Nelson, B. (2017). Does computer use matter? The influence of computer usage on eighth-grade students’ mathematics reasoning. Paper presented at the FIRE: Forum for International Research in Education, 4, 67-87. https://doi.org/10.18275/fire201704011120
• Boslaugh, S. (2007). Secondary data sources for public health: A practical guide: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618802
• Brady, K. (2016, October 12). German Education Minister Unveils 5-Billion-Euro ‘DigitalPact’ for 40,000 schools. Deutsche Welle. Retrieved from https://www.dw.com/en/german-education-minister-unveils-5-billion-euro-digital-pact-for-40000-schools/a-36023544
• Bulut, O., & Cutumisu, M. (2017). When technology does not add up: ICT use negatively predicts mathematics and science achievement for Finnish and Turkish students in PISA 2012. Paper presented at the EdMedia+ Innovate Learning. Retrieved from https://sites.ualberta.ca/~cutumisu/publications/2017/2017EdMedia_BulutCutumisu.pdf
• Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung. (2016). Bildungsoffensive für die digitale Wissensgesellschaft: Strategie des Bundesministeriums für Bildung und Forschung. Retrieved from https://www.bmbf.de/files/Bildungsoffensive_fuer_die_digitale_Wissensgesellschaft.pdf
• Comi, S. L., Argentin, G., Gui, M., Origo, F., & Pagani, L. (2017). Is it the way they use it? Teachers, ICT and student achievement. Economics of Education Review, 56, 24-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev. 2016.11.007
• Creemers, B. P. (1994). Effective instruction: An empirical basis for a theory of educational effectiveness. In Advances in school effectiveness research and practice (pp. 189-205): Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-042392-0.50014-0
• Cresswell, J., & Plano Clark, V. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed method research. 2nd Sage. Thousand Oaks, CA.
• Drossel, K., & Eickelmann, B. (2017). Teachers’ participation in professional development concerning the implementation of new technologies in class: a latent class analysis of teachers and the relationship with the use of computers, ICT self-efficacy and emphasis on teaching ICT skills. Large-scale Assessments in Education, 5(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-017-0053-7
• Eickelmann, B., Drossel, K., Wendt, H., & Bos, W. (2012). ICT-use in primary schools and children’s mathematics achievement-a multi-level approach to compare educational systems through an international lens with TIMSS data. Paper presented at the Joint AARE APERA International Conference, WERA focal meeting, Sydney. Retrieved from https://kw.uni-paderborn.de/fileadmin/fakultaet/Institute/erziehungswissenschaft/Schulpaedagogik/PDF/WERA_2012_Eickelmann_et_al..pdf
• Eickelmann, B., Lorenz, R., & Endberg, M. (2016). Die eingeschätzte Relevanz der Phasen der Lehrerausbildung hinsichtlich der Vermittlung didaktischer und methodischer Kompetenzen von Lehrpersonen für den schulischen Einsatz digitaler Medien in Deutschland und im Bundesländervergleich. In W. Bos, R. Lorenz, M. Endberg, B. Eickelmann, R. Kammerl, & S. Welling (Eds.), Schule digital—der Länderindikator 2016. Kompetenzen von Lehrpersonen der Sekundarstufe I im Umgang mit digitalen Medien im Bundesländervergleich (pp. 149–182). Münster: Waxmann.
• Falck, O., Mang, C., & Woessmann, L. (2018). Virtually no effect? Different uses of classroom computers and their effect on student achievement. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 80(1), 1-38. https://doi.org/10.1111/obes.12192
• Fraillon, J., Ainley, J., Schulz, W., Friedman, T., & Gebhardt, E. (2014). Students’ use of and engagement with ICT at home and school. In Preparing for life in a digital age (pp. 125-166): Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14222-7_6
• Garson, G. D. (2013). Introductory guide to HLM with HLM 7 software. Hierarchical linear modeling: Guide and applications, 55-96. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483384450.n3
• Geesa, R. L., Izci, B., Song, H., & Chen, S. (2019). Exploring factors of home resources and attitudes towards mathematics in mathematics achievement in South Korea, Turkey, and the United States. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(9), em1751. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/108487
• Güzeller, C. O., & Akin, A. (2014). Relationship between ICT variables and mathematics achievement based on PISA 2006 database: International evidence. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 13, 184-192. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1018171.pdf
• Heinz, J. (2016). Digital skills and the influence of students’ socio-economic background. An exploratory study in German elementary schools. Italian Journal of Sociology of Education, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.14658/pupj-ijse-2016-2-9
• Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative health research, 15(9), 1277-1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
• Hu, X., Gong, Y., Lai, C., & Leung, F. K. (2018). The relationship between ICT and student literacy in mathematics, reading, and science across 44 countries: A multilevel analysis. Computers & Education, 125, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.021
• IEA. (2019). TIMSS 2015: Grade 4 SPSS data and documentation. Chestnut Hill: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College and International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA). Retrieved from https://www.iea.nl/repository/studies/timss-2015l
• Johansone, I. (2016). Survey Operations Procedures in TIMSS 2015. In M. O, Martin, I. V. S, Mullis & M, Hooper, (Eds.), Methods and Procedures in TIMSS 2015 (pp. 6.1 – 6.22). Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College and International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA). Retrieved from https://timssandpirls.bc.edu/publications/timss/2015-methods/T15_MP_Chap6_Survey_Operations.pdf
• Kadijevich, D. M. (2015). A dataset from TIMSS to examine the relationship between computer use and mathematics achievement. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(5), 984-987. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12309
• Kim, S. (2018). ICT and the UN’s sustainable development goal for education: Using ICT to boost the math performance of immigrant youths in the US. Sustainability, 10(12), 4584. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124584
• Kraus, J. (2015, February 25). Lehrerverband warnt vor “totaler Zwangsdigitalisierung”. Deutschlandfunk Kultur. Retrieved from https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=de&u=https://www.deutschlandfunkkultur.de/schule-lehrerverband-warnt-vor-totaler-zwangsdigitalisierung.1008.de.html%3Fdram:article_id%3D312601&prev=search
• Kreijger, G. (2017, January 15). In German schools, tech arrives at snail's pace. Handelsblatt Retrieved on 25 April 2019 from https://www.handelsblatt.com/today/politics/uphill-battle-in-german-schools-tech-arrives-at-snails-pace/23565294.html?ticket=ST-1262843-KSlQYHTKYU5CcW5yMeRM-ap2
• Kruger, G. M. (2018). The relationship between investment in ICT and mathematics achievement (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pretoria, Pretoria). Retrieved from https://repository.up.ac.za/bitstream/handle/2263/67752/Kruger_Relationship_2018.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
• Kultusministerkonferenz. (2016). Bildung in der digitalen Welt Bildung in der digitalen Welt, Strategie der Kultusministerkonferenz. Retrieved on 13 March 2019 from https://www.kmk.org/aktuelles/thema-2016-bildung-in-der-digitalen-welt.html
• LaRoche, S., Joncas, M., & Foy, P. (2016). Sample Design in TIMSS 2015. In M. O, Martin, I. V. S, Mullis & M, Hooper, (Eds.), Methods and Procedures in TIMSS 2015 (pp. 3.1 – 3.37). Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College and International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA). https://timssandpirls.bc.edu/publications/timss/2015-methods/chapter-3.html
• Meggiolaro, S. (2018). Information and communication technologies use, gender and mathematics achievement: evidence from Italy. Social Psychology of Education, 21(2), 497-516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-017-9425-7
• Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Hooper, M. (2016). TIMSS 2015 International results in mathematics. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College and International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA). Retrieved from http://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2015/international-results/
• OECD. (2014). Measuring Innovation in Education: A New Perspective, Educational Research and Innovation. Paris, France: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264215696-en
• OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 Results (Volume I): Excellence and Equity in Education. Paris, France: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264266490-en
• Petko, D., Cantieni, A., & Prasse, D. (2017). Perceived quality of educational technology matters: A secondary analysis of students’ ICT use, ICT-related attitudes, and PISA 2012 test scores. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 54(8), 1070-1091. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633116649373
• Skryabin, M., Zhang, J., Liu, L., & Zhang, D. (2015). How the ICT development level and usage influence student achievement in reading, mathematics, and science. Computers & Education, 85, 49-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.02.004
• Spitzer, M. (2012). Digitale Demenz: Wie wir uns und unsere Kinder um den Verstand bringen: Droemer Knaur. Munich.
• Spitzer, M. (2016, December 15). Digital dementia, dott. Manfred spritzer. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pgp-0MyWtJQ
• Topçu, M. S., Erbilgin, E., & Arikan, S. (2016). Factors predicting Turkish and Korean students’ science and mathematics achievement in TIMSS 2011. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(7), 1711-1737. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1530a
• Üing, S. (2013, May 20). German schools reluctant to go 'digital'. Retrieved from https://www.dw.com/en/german-schools-reluctant-to-go-digital/a-16785880
• Venneman, M., Eickelmann, B., & Wendt, H. (2018). ICT use in primary mathematics education – Does the school context matter? In R. Walker, & S. Bedford (Eds.), European Educational Research Association 2018: Inclusion and Exclusion, Resources for Educational Research (pp. 25-37). Free University Bolzano, Bolzano. Retrieved from https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:EcHihUB3CiAJ:https://eera-ecer.de/ecer-programmes/conference/23/contribution/46458/+&cd=7&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=za
• Visser, M., Juan, A., & Feza, N. (2015). Home and school resources as predictors of mathematics performance in South Africa. South African Journal of Education, 35(1). https://doi.org/10.15700/201503062354
• Woltam, H., Feldstain, A., MacKay, J., & Rocchi, M. (2012). An introduction to hierarchical linear modelling. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 8(1), 52-69. https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.08.1.p052
• Xu, J. (2015). Investigating factors that influence conventional distraction and tech-related distraction in math homework. Computers & Education, 81, 304-314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.024
• Zhang, D., & Liu, L. (2016). How does ICT use influence students’ achievements in math and science over time? Evidence from PISA 2000 to 2012. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(9), 2431-2449. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1297a
• Zuzovsky, R. (2013). What works where? The relationship between instructional variables and schools’ mean scores in mathematics and science in low-, medium-, and high-achieving countries. Large-scale Assessments in Education, 1(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/2196-0739-1-2

APA

Saal, P. E., Graham, M. A., & van Ryneveld, L. (2020). The Relationship between Integrating Educational Technology in Mathematics Education and the Mathematics Achievement of German Students. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(12), em1905. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/8939

Vancouver

Saal PE, Graham MA, van Ryneveld L. The Relationship between Integrating Educational Technology in Mathematics Education and the Mathematics Achievement of German Students. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2020;16(12):em1905. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/8939

AMA

Saal PE, Graham MA, van Ryneveld L. The Relationship between Integrating Educational Technology in Mathematics Education and the Mathematics Achievement of German Students. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2020;16(12), em1905. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/8939

Chicago

Saal, Petronella Elize, Marien Alet Graham, and Linda van Ryneveld. "The Relationship between Integrating Educational Technology in Mathematics Education and the Mathematics Achievement of German Students". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2020 16 no. 12 (2020): em1905. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/8939

Harvard

Saal, P. E., Graham, M. A., and van Ryneveld, L. (2020). The Relationship between Integrating Educational Technology in Mathematics Education and the Mathematics Achievement of German Students. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(12), em1905. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/8939

MLA

Saal, Petronella Elize et al. "The Relationship between Integrating Educational Technology in Mathematics Education and the Mathematics Achievement of German Students". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 16, no. 12, 2020, em1905. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/8939