Using Three-Tier Diagnostic Test to Assess Students’ Misconceptions of States of Matter

Zubeyde Demet Kirbulut; Omer Geban

doi:10.12973/eurasia.2014.1128a

Full Text (PDF)

Zubeyde Demet Kirbulut ¹ ^* , Omer Geban ²

More Detail

¹ Harran University, TURKEY² Middle East Technical University, TURKEY^* Corresponding Author

Abstract

This study involves the development of a three-tier diagnostic test to measure high school students’ understanding of states of matter concepts. The States of Matter Diagnostic Test (SMDT) is a 19-item three-tier diagnostic test consisting of three-tier items for assessing students’ understanding of states of matter concepts. The SMDT was administered to 195 10th grade high school students in the pilot study and 102 10th grade high school students in the main study. Cronbach alpha reliability indexes for the SMDT were estimated to be .78 and .83 for the pilot and main study, respectively. Point-biserial coefficients ranged from .20 to .69 with an average of .44 for the pilot study and with an average of .49 for the main study.

Keywords

diagnostic test
science education
secondary school
states of matter
three-tier test

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Research Article

EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed, 2014, Volume 10, Issue 5, 509-521

https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1128a

Publication date: 15 Dec 2014

Article Views: 6168

Article Downloads: 3858

Open Access References How to cite this article

References

Abimbola, I. O. (1988). The problem of terminology in the study of student conceptions in science. Science Education, 72(2), 175-184. doi: 10.1002/sce.3730720206
Artdej, R., Ratanaroutai, T., & Coll, R. K. (2010). Thai grade 11 students' alternative conceptions for acid-base chemistry. Research in Science & Technological Education, 28(2), 167-183. doi: 10.1080/02635141003748382
Ayas, A., Ozmen, H., & Calik, M. (2010). Students' conceptions of the particulate nature of matter at secondary and tertiary level. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(1), 165-184. doi: 10.1007/s10763-009-9167-x
Aydeniz, M., & Kotowski, E. L. (2012). What do middle and high school students know about the particulate nature of matter after instruction? Implications for practice. School Science and Mathematics, 112(2), 59-65. doi: DOI: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00120.x
Bar, V., & Galili, I. (1994). Stages of children’s views about evaporation. International Journal of Science Education, 16(2), 157-174. doi: 10.1080/0950069940160205
Bar, V., & Travis, A. S. (1991). Children’s views concerning phase changes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(4), 363-382. doi: 10.1002/tea.3660280409
BouJaoude, S. B. (1991). A study of the nature of students’ understandings about the concept of burning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(8), 689-704. doi: 10.1002/tea.3660280806
Caleon, I., & Subramaniam, R. (2010). Development and application of a three-tier diagnostic test to assess secondary students’ understanding of waves. International Journal of Science Education, 32(7), 939-961. doi: 10.1080/09500690902890130
Canpolat, N. (2006). Turkish undergraduates’ misconceptions of evaporation, evaporation rate, and vapour pressure. International Journal of Science Education, 28(15), 1757-1770. doi: 10.1080/09500690600779957
Cataloglu, E. (2002). Development and validation of an achievement test in introductory quantum mechanics: The quantum mechanics visualization instrument (QMVI). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Pennsylvania State University, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.
Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. Florida: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, Inc.
De Berg, K. C. (1995). Student understanding of the volume, mass, and pressure of air within a sealed syringe in different states of compression. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(8), 871-884. doi: 10.1002/tea.3660320809
Duit, R. (2007). Bibliography. Students’ and Teachers’ Conceptions and Science Education. Retrieved March 28, 2008, from http://www.ipn.uni-kiel.de/aktuell/stcse/
Gabel, D. L., Samuel, K. V., & Hunn, D. (1987). Understanding the particulate nature of matter. Journal of Chemical Education, 64(8), 695-697. doi: 10.1021/ed064p695
Gilbert, J. K., Osborne, R. J., & Fensham, P. J. (1982). Children’s science and its consequences for teaching. Science Education, 66(4), 623-633. doi: 10.1002/sce.3730660412
Gopal, H., Kleinsmidt, J., & Case, J. (2004). An investigation of tertiary students’ understanding of evaporation, condensation and vapor pressure. International Journal of Science Education, 26(13), 1597-1620. doi: 10.1080/09500690410001673829
Griffiths, A. K., & Preston, K. R. (1992). Grade-12 students' misconceptions relating to fundamental characteristics of atoms and molecules. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(6), 611-628. doi: 10.1002/tea.3660290609
Haladyna, T. M. (1997). Writing test items to evaluate higher order thinking. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Hestenes, D., & Halloun, I. (1995). Interpreting the force concept inventory: A response to March 1995 critique by Huffman and Heller. The Physics Teacher, 33(8), 502- 506. doi: 10.1119/1.2344278
Hestenes, D., Wells, M., & Swackhamer, G. (1992). Force concept inventory. The Physics Teacher, 30(3), 141-151. doi: 10.1119/1.2343497
Ingec, S. K. (2009). Analysing concept maps as an assessment tool in teaching physics and comparison with the achievement tests. International Journal of Science Education, 31(14), 1897-1915. doi: 10.1080/09500690802275820
Ingram, E. L., & Nelson, C. E. (2006). Using discussions of multiple choice questions to help students identify misconceptions and reconstruct their understanding. American Biology Teacher, 68(5), 275-279. doi: 10.1894/0038-4909
Johnson, P. (1998a). Children’s understanding of changes of state involving the gas state, Part 1: Boiling water and the particle theory. International Journal of Science Education, 20(5), 567-583. doi: 10.1080/0950069980200505
Johnson, P. (1998b). Children’s understanding of changes of state involving the gas state, Part 2: Evaporation and condensation below boiling point. International Journal of Science Education, 20(6), 695-709. doi: 10.1080/0950069980200607
Kaya, O. N. (2008). A student-centred approach: Assessing the changes in prospective science teachers' conceptual understanding by concept mapping in a general chemistry laboratory. Research in Science Education, 38(1), 91-110. doi: 10.1007/s11165-007-9048-7
Kutluay, Y. (2005). Diagnosis of eleventh grade students’ misconceptions about geometric optic by a three-tier test. Unpublished master’s thesis, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey.
Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2006). Designing qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Martin, B. L., Mintzes, J. J., & Clavijo, I. E. (2000). Restructuring knowledge in biology: Cognitive processes and metacognitive reflections. International Journal of Science Education, 22(3), 303-323. doi: 10.1080/095006900289895
Novak, J. D. (1990). Concept mapping: A useful tool for science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(10), 937-949. doi: 10.1002/tea.3660271003
Novak, J. D., & Gowin, D. B. (1984). Learning how to learn. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Nakhleh, M. B. (1992). Why some students don’t learn chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 69(3), 191-196. doi: 10.1021/ed069p191
Novick, S., & Nussbaum, J. (1978). Junior high school pupils’ understanding of the particulate nature of matter: An interview study. Science Education, 62(3), 273-281. doi: 10.1002/sce.3730620303
Odom, A. L., & Barrow, L. H. (1995). Development and application of a two-tier diagnostic test measuring college biology students' understanding of diffusion and osmosis after a course of instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(1), 45-61. doi: 10.1002/tea.3660320106
Osborne, R. J. (1980). Some aspects of the students’ view of the world. Research in Science Education, 10(1), 11-18. doi: 10.1007/BF02356304
Osborne, R. J., & Cosgrove, M. M. (1983). Children’s conceptions of the changes of state of water. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20(9), 825-838. doi: 10.1002/tea.3660200905
Osborne, R. J., & Gilbert, J. K. (1980). A technique for exploring students' views of the world. Physics Education, 15(6), 376-379. doi: 10.1088/0031-9120/15/6/312
Pesman, H. (2005). Development of a three-tier test to assess ninth grade students’ misconceptions about simple electric circuits. Unpublished master’s thesis, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey.
Pesman, H., & Eryilmaz, A. (2010). Development of a threetier test to assess misconceptions about simple electric circuits. The Journal of Educational Research, 103(3), 208- 222. doi: 10.1080/00220670903383002
Peterson, R., Treagust, D. F., & Garnett, P. (1986). Identification of secondary students’ misconceptions of covalent bonding and structure concepts using a diagnostic instrument. Research in Science Education, 16(1), 40-48. doi: 10.1007/BF02356816
Tan, K. C. D., Goh, N. K., Chia, L. S., & Treagust, D. F. (2002). Development and application of a two-tier multiple choice diagnostic instrument to assess high school students' understanding of inorganic chemistry qualitative analysis. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(4), 283-301. doi: 10.1002/tea.10023
Treagust, D. F. (1986). Evaluating students’ misconceptions by means of diagnostic multiple choice items. Research in Science Education, 16(1), 199-207. doi: 10.1007/BF02356835
Tytler, R. (2000). A comparison of year 1 and year 6 students’ conceptions of evaporation and condensation: Dimensions of conceptual progression. International Journal of Science Education, 22(5), 447-467. doi: 10.1080/095006900289723
Voska, K. W., & Heikkinen, H. W. (2000). Identification and analysis of student conceptions used to solve chemical equilibrium problems. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(2), 160-176. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098- 2736(200002)37:23.0.CO;2-M

How to cite this article

APA

Kirbulut, Z. D., & Geban, O. (2014). Using Three-Tier Diagnostic Test to Assess Students’ Misconceptions of States of Matter. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 10(5), 509-521. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1128a

Vancouver

Kirbulut ZD, Geban O. Using Three-Tier Diagnostic Test to Assess Students’ Misconceptions of States of Matter. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2014;10(5):509-21. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1128a

AMA

Kirbulut ZD, Geban O. Using Three-Tier Diagnostic Test to Assess Students’ Misconceptions of States of Matter. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2014;10(5), 509-521. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1128a

Chicago

Kirbulut, Zubeyde Demet, and Omer Geban. "Using Three-Tier Diagnostic Test to Assess Students’ Misconceptions of States of Matter". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2014 10 no. 5 (2014): 509-521. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1128a

Harvard

Kirbulut, Z. D., and Geban, O. (2014). Using Three-Tier Diagnostic Test to Assess Students’ Misconceptions of States of Matter. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 10(5), pp. 509-521. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1128a

MLA

Kirbulut, Zubeyde Demet et al. "Using Three-Tier Diagnostic Test to Assess Students’ Misconceptions of States of Matter". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 10, no. 5, 2014, pp. 509-521. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1128a