An Analysis of Linguistic Features of the Multiplication Tables and the Language of Multiplication

Emily Sum; Oh Nam Kwon

doi:10.29333/ejmste/90760

Full Text (PDF)

Emily Sum ¹ ^* , Oh Nam Kwon ¹

More Detail

¹ Seoul National University, Seoul, SOUTH KOREA^* Corresponding Author

Abstract

This study analyses the linguistic features of Korean language in learning multiplication. Ancient Korean multiplication tables, Gugudan, as well as mathematics textbooks and teacher’s guides from South Korea were examined for the instruction of multiplication in second grade. Our findings highlight the uniqueness of the grammatical features of numbers, the syntax of multiplication tables, the simplicity of language of multiplication in Korean language, and also the complexities and ambiguities in English language. We believe that, by examining the specific language of a topic, we will help to identify how language and culture tools shape the understanding of students’ mathematical development. Although this study is based on Korean context, the method and findings will shed light on other East Asian languages, and will add value to the research on international comparative studies.

Keywords

cultural artefacts
Korean language
linguistic features
multiplication tables

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Research Article

EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed, 2018, Volume 14, Issue 7, 2839-2856

https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/90760

Publication date: 04 May 2018

Article Views: 2529

Article Downloads: 2931

Open Access References How to cite this article

References

Adams, K. L., & Conklin, N. F. (1973). Toward a theory of natural classification. Ninth regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 9, 1-10.
Allan, K. (1977). Classifiers. Language, 53(2), 285-311. https://doi.org/10.2307/413103.
Anghileri, J. (1991). The language of multiplication and division. Durkin, K. and Shire, B. (FAs). Language in Mathematical Education, 95-104. Buckingham: OUP.
Barton, B. (2009). The language of mathematics: Telling mathematical tales. New York: Springer.
Beilin, H. (1975). Studies in the cognitive basis of language development. Academic Press.
Biggs, J. (1996). Western misperceptions of the Confucian-heritage learning culture. The Chinese learner: Cultural, psychological and contextual influences, 45-67. Comparative Education Research Centre, Faculty of Education, University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong; The Australian Council for Educational Research, Ltd., 19 Prospect Hill Road, Camberwell, Melbourne, Victoria 3124, Australia.
Chemla, K. (2008). Zhu Shijie 朱世傑. Encyclopaedia of the History of Science, Technology, and Medicine in Non-Western Cultures, 2359-2360. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4425-0_8959.
Cheng, K. M. (1994). Quality of education as perceived in the Chinese culture. Takala T. (ed.), Quality of Education in the Context of Culture in Developing Countries, 67-84. Tampere, Finland, Tampere University Press.
Clarke, D. J. (2013). Contingent conceptions of accomplished practice: the cultural specificity of discourse in and about the mathematics classroom. ZDM Mathematics Education, 45(1), 21-33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-012-0452-8.
Clarke, D. J., Keitel, C., & Shimizu, Y. (Eds.). (2006). Mathematics classrooms in twelve countries: The insider’s perspective (Vol. 1). Sense publishers.
Confrey, J. (1994). Splitting, similarity, and rate of change: A new approach to multiplication and exponential functions. The development of multiplicative reasoning in the learning of mathematics, 293-330. State University of New York Press.
Downing, P. A. (1996). Numeral classifier systems: The case of Japanese (Vol. 4). John Benjamins Publishing.
Durkin, K. & Shire, B. (1991). Lexical ambiguity in mathematical context. Language in mathematical education: Research and practice, 72-84. Open University Press.
Fan, L., Wong, N. Y., & Cai, J. (Eds.). (2015). How Chinese Teach Mathematics (Vol. 6). World Scientific. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814415828.
Fan, L., Wong, N.-Y., Cai, J., & Li, S. (Eds.) (2004). How Chinese learn mathematics: perspectives from insiders, Singapore, SG. World Scientific, 592pp.
Fuson, K. C. (1990). Conceptual structures for multiunit numbers: Implications for learning and teaching multidigit addition, subtraction, and place value. Cognition and instruction, 7(4), 343-403. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0704_4.
Fuson, K. C., & Kwon, Y. (1991). Chinese-based regular and European irregular systems of number words: The disadvantages for English-speaking children. Language in mathematical education: Research and practice, 211-226.
Fuson, K. C., & Kwon, Y. (1992a). Korean children’s single-digit addition and subtraction: Numbers structured by ten. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 148-165. https://doi.org/10.2307/749498.
Fuson, K. C., & Kwon, Y. (1992b). Korean children’s understanding of multidigit addition and subtraction. Child development, 63(2), 491-506. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1992.tb01642.x.
Fuson, K. C., & Li, Y. (2009). Cross-cultural issues in linguistic, visual-quantitative, and written-numeric supports for mathematical thinking. ZDM, 41(6), 793-808. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-009-0183-7.
Geary, D. C., Bow-Thomas, C. C., Fan, L., & Siegler, R. S. (1993). Even before formal instruction, Chinese children outperform American children in mental addition. Cognitive Development, 8(4), 517-529. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2014(05)80007-3.
Greer, B. (1992). Multiplication and division as models of situations. Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning: A project of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 276-295. New York: Macmillan.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic. Arnold: London.
Her, O. S. (2012). Distinguishing classifiers and measure words: A mathematical perspective and implications. Science Direct, 122(14), 1668-1691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2012.08.012.
Her, O. S., Chen, Y. C., & Yen, N. S. (2018). Neural correlates of quantity processing of Chinese numeral classiﬁers. Brain and Language, 176, 11-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2017.10.007.
Ho, C. S. H., & Fuson, K. C. (1998). Children’s knowledge of teen quantities as tens and ones: Comparisons of Chinese, British, and American kindergartners. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(3), 536. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.90.3.536.
Ito, H., Kubo-Kawai, N., & Masataka, N. (2011). The Role of Learning the Japanese Kuku Multiplication Chant in Simple Arithmetic Operations. Creative Education, 2(3), 276. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2011.23037.
Kaput, J. J. (1985). Multiplicative Word Problems and Intensive Quantities: An Integrated Software Response. Technical Report 85-19. Educational Technology Center, Cambridge, MA.
Kwon, O. N., & Cho, S. J. (2012). Balance between foundations and creativity: features of Korean mathematics education. ZDM Mathematics Education, 44, 105-108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-012-0409-y.
Lee, C. (2006). Language for Learning Mathematics: Assessment for Learning in Practice: Assessment for Learning in Practice. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
Lee, I., & Ramsey, S. R. (2000). The Korean Language. Suny Press.
Lee, K. O. (1997). The role of semantic and syntactic knowledge in the first language acquisition of Korean classifiers. Journal of Korean Association of Child Studies, 18-2, 73-85.
Lee, K. O., & Lee, S. Y. (2009). The acquisition of Korean numeral classifiers. The handbook of East Asian psycholinguistics, 137-149. Cambridge University Press.
LeFevre, J. A., & Liu, J. (1997). The role of experience in numerical skill: Multiplication performance in adults from Canada and China. Mathematical Cognition, 3(1), 31-62. https://doi.org/10.1080/135467997387470.
Leung, F. K. S. (1989). The Chinese Culture and Mathematics Learning. C. Keitel (Ed.) Mathematics, Education, and Society. UNESCO.
Leung, F. K. S. (2001). In search of an East Asian identity in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 47(1), 35-51. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017936429620.
Leung, F. K. S. (2002). Behind the high achievement of East Asian students. Educational Research and Evaluation, 8(1), 87-108. https://doi.org/10.1076/edre.8.1.87.6920.
Leung, F. K. S. (2006). Mathematics Education in East Asia and the West: Does Culture Matter? In F.K.S. Leung, K. D. Graf, & F. J. Lopex-Real (Eds.), Mathematics Education in Different Cultural Traditions. A Comparative Study of East Asia and the West: The 13th ICMI study (pp. 21-46). Boston, MA: Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-29723-5_2.
Leung, F. K. S. (2014). What can and should we learn from international studies of mathematics achievement? Mathematics Education Research Journal, 26(3), 579-605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-013-0109-0.
Leung, F. K. S., & Park, K. (2002). Competent students, competent teachers? International Journal of Educational Research, 37(2), 113-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(02)00055-1.
Mangan, C. (1986). Choice of operation in multiplication and division word problems (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Queen's University, Belfast.
Miller, K. F., & Stigler, J. W. (1987). Counting in Chinese: Cultural variation in a basic cognitive skill. Cognitive Development, 2(3), 279-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2014(87)90091-8.
Miller, K. F., Kelly, M., & Zhou, X. (2005). Learning mathematics in China and the United States. Handbook of mathematical cognition, 163-178.
Miura, I. T., & Okamoto, Y. (2003). Language supports for mathematics understanding and performance. A. J. Baroody & A. Dowker (Eds.), Studies in mathematical thinking and learning. The development of arithmetic concepts and skills: Constructing adaptive expertise, 229-242. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Miura, I. T., Okamoto, Y., Kim, C. C., Steere, M., & Fayol, M. (1993). First graders’ cognitive representation of number and understanding of place value: Cross-national comparisons: France, Japan, Korea, Sweden, and the United States. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(1), 24-30. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.85.1.24.
Morgan, C. (1995). An analysis of the discourse of written reports of investigative work in GCSE mathematics (PhD dissertation), Institute of Education, University of London, London.
Morgan, C., Craig, T., Schuette, M., & Wagner, D. (2014). Language and communication in mathematics education: an overview of research in the field. ZDM, 46(6), 843-853. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-014-0624-9.
Ng, S. S. N., & Rao, N. (2010). Chinese number words, culture, and mathematics learning. Review of Educational Research, 80(2), 180-206. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654310364764.
Pimm, D. (1987). Speaking Mathematically: Communication in Mathematics Classrooms. Language, Education and Society series. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London and New York.
Ruddock, G., Clausen-May, T., Purple, C., & Ager, R. (2006). Validation study of the PISA 2000, PISA 2003 and TIMSS-2003 international studies of pupil attainment. Nottingham: Department for Education and Science.
Schleppegrell, M. J. (2007). The linguistic challenges of mathematics teaching and learning: A research review. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 23(2), 139-159. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560601158461.
Solano-Flores, G. (2010). Function and form in research on language and mathematics education. Language and mathematics in education: Multiple perspectives and directions for research, 113-149.
Song, J. J. (2005). The Korean language: Structure, use and context. Routledge.
Song, M., & Ginsburg, H. P. (1985). The development of informal and formal mathematical knowledge in Korean and American children. Paper presented to the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Toronto.
Song, M., & Ginsburg, H. P. (1986). The effect of the Korean number system on early mathematics ability. Paper presented to the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
Stephens, A. C., Ellis, A. B., Blanton, M., & Brizuela, B. M. (2017). Algebra Thinking in the Elementary and Middle Grades. In J. Cai (Ed.), Compendium for research in mathematics education, 421-456. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Stevenson, H. W. (1987). America’s math problems. Educational Leadership, 45(2), 4-10.
Uchida, N., & Imai, M. (1996). A study on the acquisition of numerical classifiers among young children: The development of human/animal categories and generation of the rule of classifiers applying. Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology, 44(2), 126-135. https://doi.org/10.5926/jjep1953.44.2_126.
Vergnaud, G. (1983). Multiplicative structures. Acquisition of mathematics concepts and processes, 127-174. Academic Press.
Vergnaud, G. (1988). Multiplicative structures. Hiebert, J., & Behr, M. (Eds), Number Concepts and Operations in the Middle Grades, Volume 2. Research Agenda for Mathematics Education, 141-161. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 1906 Association Drive, Reston, VA 22091.
Watanabe, T. (2003). Teaching multiplication: An analysis of elementary school mathematics teachers’ manuals from Japan and the United States. The Elementary School Journal, 104(2), 111-125. https://doi.org/10.1086/499745.
Whorf, B. L., Carroll, J. B., Levinson, S. C., & Lee, P. (2012). Language, thought, and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. Mit Press.

How to cite this article

APA

Sum, E., & Kwon, O. N. (2018). An Analysis of Linguistic Features of the Multiplication Tables and the Language of Multiplication. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(7), 2839-2856. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/90760

Vancouver

Sum E, Kwon ON. An Analysis of Linguistic Features of the Multiplication Tables and the Language of Multiplication. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2018;14(7):2839-56. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/90760

AMA

Sum E, Kwon ON. An Analysis of Linguistic Features of the Multiplication Tables and the Language of Multiplication. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2018;14(7), 2839-2856. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/90760

Chicago

Sum, Emily, and Oh Nam Kwon. "An Analysis of Linguistic Features of the Multiplication Tables and the Language of Multiplication". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2018 14 no. 7 (2018): 2839-2856. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/90760

Harvard

Sum, E., and Kwon, O. N. (2018). An Analysis of Linguistic Features of the Multiplication Tables and the Language of Multiplication. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(7), pp. 2839-2856. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/90760

MLA

Sum, Emily et al. "An Analysis of Linguistic Features of the Multiplication Tables and the Language of Multiplication". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 14, no. 7, 2018, pp. 2839-2856. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/90760