Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

• Akcil, U. (2015) Effects of Digital Citizenship and Open Leadership to Administrative Functions, Unpublished Phd Thesis. Near East University Faculty of Education Institute.
• Anderson, R.E. & Dexter, S. (2005). School technology leadership: An empirical investigation of prevalence and effect. Educational Administration Quarterly, 41, 49-82.
• Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 2, 191-215.
• Bennett, L.A., Aguayo, R.C. & Field, S.L. (2016) At Home in the World: Supporting Children in Human Rights, Global Citizenship, and Digital Citizenship. Journal of Childhood Education, 92(3), 189-199.
• Blackey, H. & Chew, E. (2009). Social Software Policy 2009–2012 for The University of Glamorgan. The Policy of the University of Glamorgan.
• Boyd, D.M. & Ellison, NB. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 13, 1, 11.
• Bush, T., Kiggundu, E. & Moorosi, P. (2011). Preparing new principals in South Africa: the ACE: School leadership Programme. South African Journal of Education, 31, 1, 31-43.
• Conole, G. & Culver, J. (2010). The design of cloud works: Applying social networking practice to foster the exchange of learning and teaching ideas and designs. Computers & Education, 54, 679-692.
• Corlett, D. Sharples, M., Bull, S. & Chan, T. (2005). Evaluation of a mobile learning organiser for university students. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 3, 162-170.
• Çelik, H.C.& Bindak, R. (2005). The primary school teachers, evaluation of attitudes by computer several variables. Inonu University Education Faculty Journal, 6, 10.
• Cheng-Yao, L. (2008). Beliefs about Using Technology in the Mathematics Classroom: Interviews with Pre-service Elementary Teachers, EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 4(2), 135-142.
• Çuhadar, C. (2012). Exploration of problematic internet use and social interaction anxiety among Turkish pre-service teachers. Computers & Education, 59, 173-181.
• Czerniewicz, L. & Brown, C. (2014). The habitus and technological practices of rural students: a case study. South African Journal of Education, 34, 1, 1-14.
• Davis, F. (1989). A Technology Acceptance Model for Empirically Testing New End User İnformation Systems: Theory And Results. Doctoral Thesis. MIT Sloan School of Management, Cambridge, MA.
• Demirel, M. & Dağyar, M. (2016). Effects of Problem-Based Learning on Attitude: A Meta-analysis Study. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(8), 2115-2137.
• Fırat, M. (2010). Information society education sustainability and the future of School. International Conference on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, Antalya, Turkey.
• Hacıfazlıoğlu, Ö., Karadeniz, Ş. & Dalgıç, G. (2011). Validity and reliability study of technological leadership self-efficacy scale for school administrators. Educational Administration Theory and Practice, 17, 2, 145-166.
• Hacıfazlıoğlu, Ö., Karadeniz, Ş. & Dalgıç, G. (2010). Views of teachers, administrators and supervisors regarding the technological leadership standards for administrators. Educational Administration Theory and Practice, 16, 4, 537-577
• Isın, E. & Rupert, (2015). Being Digital Citizens. London: Rowman & Littlefield.
• ISTE (2002). National educational technology standards for administrators. Retrieved February 6, 2015, from http://www.iste.org/docs/pdfs/nets-for-administrators-2002_en.pdf?sfvrsn=2
• ISTE (2009). National educational technology standards for administrators. Retrieved February 6, 2015, from http://www. iste.org/docs/pdfs/nets-a-standards.pdf.
• Keller, C. (2005). Virtual learning environments: three implementation perspectives. Learning, Media and Technology Journal, 30, 3, 299-311.
• Legris, P., Ingham, J. & Collerette, P. (2003). Why do people use information technology? a critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information and Management Journal, 40, 191-204.
• Li, C. (2010). Open Leadership: How social technology can transform the way you lead. (1st ed). USA, San Francisco: A Wiley Imprint.
• Mayisela, T. (2013). The potential use of mobile technology: enhancing accessibility and communication in a blended learning course. South African Journal of Education, 33, 1, 1-18.
• Mitchell, C. & DeLange, N. (2013). What can a teacher do with a cellphone? Using participatory visual research to speak back in addressing HIV&AIDS. South African Journal of Education, 33, 4, 1-13.
• Mossberger, K., Tolbert, C. & McNeal, R.S. (2007). Digital Citizenship: The Internet, Society, and Participation. London, England: The MIT Press.
• Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9, 5, 1-6.
• Ribble, M. (2011). Digital Citizenship in Schools, (2nd Edition). Washington DC: The International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE).
• Ribble, M. & Bailey, G. (2007). Digital Citizenships in Schools. Washington: ISTE.
• Surry, D.W. (2000). Strategies for motivating higher education faculty to use technology. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 37, 2, 145.
• Yu, C. & Durrington, V.A. (2006). Technology standards for school administrators: An analysis of practicing and aspiring administrators’ perceived ability to performance standards. NASSP Bulletin, 90, 301-317.
• Yang, J., Huang, R. & Kinshuk (2016). The Learning Preferences of Digital Learners in K-12 Schools in China. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(4), 1047-1064.

APA

Akcil, U., Aksal, F. A., Mukhametzyanova, F. S., & Gazi, Z. A. (2017). An Examination of Open and Technology Leadership in Managerial Practices of Education System. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(1), 119-131. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00607a

Vancouver

Akcil U, Aksal FA, Mukhametzyanova FS, Gazi ZA. An Examination of Open and Technology Leadership in Managerial Practices of Education System. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2017;13(1):119-31. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00607a

AMA

Akcil U, Aksal FA, Mukhametzyanova FS, Gazi ZA. An Examination of Open and Technology Leadership in Managerial Practices of Education System. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2017;13(1), 119-131. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00607a

Chicago

Akcil, Umut, Fahriye Altınay Aksal, Farida Sh. Mukhametzyanova, and Zehra Altınay Gazi. "An Examination of Open and Technology Leadership in Managerial Practices of Education System". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2017 13 no. 1 (2017): 119-131. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00607a

Harvard

Akcil, U., Aksal, F. A., Mukhametzyanova, F. S., and Gazi, Z. A. (2017). An Examination of Open and Technology Leadership in Managerial Practices of Education System. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(1), pp. 119-131. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00607a

MLA

Akcil, Umut et al. "An Examination of Open and Technology Leadership in Managerial Practices of Education System". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 13, no. 1, 2017, pp. 119-131. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00607a