Can “Integrated Learning” with English support science education? A case study in Portugal

Valentina Piacentini; Rui Marques Vieira; Ana Raquel Simões

doi:10.29333/ejmste/12069

Full Text (PDF)

Valentina Piacentini ¹ ² ^* , Rui Marques Vieira ² , Ana Raquel Simões ²

More Detail

¹ I. C. “Via Merope” (School Cluster), Rome, ITALY² Research Centre on Didactics and Technology in the Education of Trainers (CIDTFF), University of Aveiro, PORTUGAL^* Corresponding Author

Abstract

Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) is an approach used in different countries for learning foreign languages (FL) during non-language classes. Studies suggest that teaching methodologies aware of (verbal) language–such as CLIL–and other science modes (operational, symbolic, visual, etc.) can be beneficial for learning science. Within this PhD research, we aimed to understand science education practices and the influence of English (as a FL) on CLIL science teaching/learning. We designed a qualitative case study in a Portuguese school and gathered information through different methods. We found that, because English is present, a science teacher may become more open to the students’ (language) learning difficulties and to changing strategies/resources. Besides promoting FL proficiency, CLIL could represent a language-aware approach for enhancing science teaching/learning. This contributes to studies on CLIL and science education with a language focus and opens a reflection on teacher practices/education for the learning of science.

Keywords

Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL)
English as a Foreign Language (EFL)
language-focused science education
lower secondary school
qualitative research
scientific literacy

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Research Article

EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed, 2022, Volume 18, Issue 6, Article No: em2114

https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12069

Publication date: 07 May 2022

Article Views: 1513

Article Downloads: 1041

Open Access Disclosures References How to cite this article

Disclosure

Declaration of Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest is declared by author(s).

Data sharing statement: Data supporting the findings and conclusions are available upon request from the corresponding author(s).

References

Bezemer, J., & Kress, G. (2020). Semiotic work in the science classroom. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 15(1), 71-74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-019-09957-4
Blanchard, B., Masserot, V., & Holbrook, J. (2014). The PROFILES project promoting science teaching in a foreign language. Science Education International, 25(2), 78-96. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1032970
Bruton, A. (2013). CLIL: Some of the reasons why… and why not. System, 41(3), 587-597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.07.001
Canet Pladevall, R., & Evnitskaya, N. (2011). Rethink, rewrite, remake, or learning to teach science through English. In C. Escobar Urmeneta, N. Evnitskaya, E. Moore, & A. Patiño (Eds.), AICLE-CLIL-EMILE: Educació plurilingüe. Experiencias, research & polítiques [Multilingual education. Experiences, research & policies] (pp. 167-177). Servei de Publicacions de la Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
Cenoz, J. (2015). Content-based instruction and content and language integrated learning: The same or different? Language, Culture and Curriculum, 28(1), 8-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2014.1000922
Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2009). “Multiliteracies”: New literacies, new learning. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 4(3), 164-195. https://doi.org/10.1080/15544800903076044
Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL Content and Language Integrated Learning. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009024549
Coyle, D., & Meyer, O. (2021). Beyond CLIL. Pluriliteracies teaching for deeper learning. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108914505
Dale, L., & Tanner, R. (2012). CLIL activities. A resource for subject and language teachers. Cambridge University Press.
Dalton-Puffer, C. (2011). Content-and-Language Integrated Learning: From practice to principles? Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 182-204. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190511000092
Duit, R. (2007). Science education research internationally: Conceptions, research methods, domains of research. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 3(1), 3-15. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75369
Ellison, M. (2018). (Net)working CLIL in Portugal. E-TEALS, 9(s1), 4-22. https://doi.org/10.2478/eteals-2018-0010
Escobar Urmeneta, C., & Evnitskaya, N. (2014). ‘Do you know Actimel?’ The adaptive nature of dialogic teacher-led discussions in the CLIL science classroom: A case study. The Language Learning Journal, 42(2), 165-180. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2014.889507
Espinet, M., Izquierdo, M., Bonil, J., & Ramos-de Robles, S. L. (2012). The role of language in modeling the natural world: Perspectives in science education. In B. J. Fraser, K. Tobin, & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education (pp. 1385-1403). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9041-7_89
European Commission. (2003). Promoting language learning and linguistic diversity: An action plan 2004 -2006. European Communities.
European Commission. (2017). Key data on teaching languages at school in Europe–2017. Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2797/04255
Fernández-Fontecha, A., O’Halloran, K. L., Wignell, P., & Tan, S. (2020). Scaffolding CLIL in the science classroom via visual thinking: A systemic functional multimodal approach. Linguistics and Education, 55, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2019.100788
Fernández-Sanjurjo, F., Fernández-Costales, A., & Arias Blanco, J. M. (2019). Analysing students’ content-learning in science in CLIL vs. non-CLIL programmes: Empirical evidence from Spain. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 22(6), 661-674. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2017.1294142
Gajo, L. (2007). Linguistic knowledge and subject knowledge: How does bilingualism contribute to subject development? International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 10(5), 563-581. https://doi.org/10.2167/beb460.0
Gimeno, A., Seiz, R., de Siqueira, J. M., & Martínez, A. (2010). Content and language integrated learning in higher technical education using the inGenio online multimedia authoring tool. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2010), 3170-3174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.484
Grandinetti, M., Langellotti, M., & Ting, Y.-L. T. (2013). How CLIL can provide a pragmatic means to renovate science education–even in a sub-optimally bilingual context. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 16(3), 354-374. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2013.777390
Holbrook, J., & Rannikmae, M. (2009). The meaning of scientific literacy. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 4(3), 275-288. http://www.ijese.net/makale/1394
Howell, E. L., & Brossard, D. (2021). (Mis)informed about what? What it means to be a science-literate citizen in a digital world. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(15), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1912436117
Lasagabaster, D., & Sierra, J. M. (2010). Immersion and CLIL in English: More differences than similarities. ELT Journal, 64(4), 367-375. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccp082
Lemke, J. (2003). Teaching all the languages of science: Words, symbols, images, and actions. http://www.jaylemke.com/science-education/
Llinares, A., Morton, T., & Whittaker, R. (2012). The role of language in CLIL. Cambridge University Press.
Marsh, D, Mehisto, P., Wolff, D., & Frigols Martín, M. J. (2011). European framework for CLIL teacher education. European Centre for Modern Languages.
Marsh, D. (2006). English as medium of instruction in the new global linguistic order: Global characteristics, local consequences. In Proceedings of the 2^nd Annual Conference for Middle East Teachers of Science, Mathematics and Computing (pp. 29-38). METSMaC.
Martins, I. P. (2002). Educação e Educação em Ciências [Education and science education]. Universidade de Aveiro.
Mehisto, P. (2012). Criteria for producing CLIL learning material. Encuentro, 21, 15-33. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED539729.pdf
Merriam, S. B. (1995). What can you tell from a N of 1? Issues of validity and reliability in qualitative research. PAACE Journal of Lifelong Learning, 4, 51-60. https://ethnographyworkshop.files.wordpress.com/2014/11/merriam-1995-what-can-you-tell-from-an-n-of-1-issues-of-validity-and-reliability-in-qualitative-research-paace-journal-of-lifelong-le.pdf
Meyer, O., Coyle, D., Imhof, M., & Connolly, T. (2018). Beyond CLIL: Fostering student and teacher engagement for personal growth and deeper learning. In J. D. Martínez Agudo (Ed.), Emotions in second language teaching (pp. 277-297). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75438-3_16
Meyerhöffer, N., & Dreesmann, D. C. (2019). The exclusive language of science? Comparing knowledge gains and motivation in English-bilingual biology lessons between non-selected and preselected classes. International Journal of Science Education, 41(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1529446
Mortimer, E. F., & Scott, P. H. (2003). Meaning making in secondary science classrooms. Open University Press.
Osborne, J. (2007). Science education for the twenty first century. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 3(3), 173-184. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75369
Pavón Vásquez, V., & Ellison, M. (2013). Examining teacher roles and competences in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL). Lingvarvm Arena, 4, 65-78. http://193.137.34.194/index.php/LinguarumArena/article/viewFile/3967/3715
Pearson, P. D., Moje, E., & Greenleaf, C. (2010). Literacy and science: Each in the service of the other. Science, 328, 459-463. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1182595
Piacentini, V. (2020). Science education and the integration of English for learning: Study of one CLIL approach in a Portuguese lower secondary school [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Aveiro. http://hdl.handle.net/10773/28939
Piacentini, V. (2021). CLIL and Science education. A review for a Language focus in Science teaching. Ricerche di Pedagogia e Didattica – Journal of Theories and Research in Education, 16(3), 113-131. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1970-2221/12646
Piacentini, V., & Simões, A. R. (2020). CLIL: A way to develop plurilingual and intercultural competences in schools? In F. Anastassiou & G. Andreou (Eds.), English as a foreign language: Perspectives on teaching, multilingualism and interculturalism (pp. 54-83). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Piacentini, V., & Simões, A. R. (2022). Teaching and learning in the Portuguese “English Plus” project. In M. Ellison, M. Morgado, & M. Coelho (Eds.), Contexts and conditions for successful CLIL in Portugal (in press). U. Porto Press.
Piacentini, V., Simões, A. R., & Vieira, R. M. (2016). Abordagem holística no sistema educativo português para desenvolver a(s) Literacia(s) das Ciências integradas com o Inglês [Holistic approach in the Portuguese education system to develop literacies of science integrated with English]. Indagatio Didactica, 8(1), 1975–1992. https://doi.org/10.34624/id.v8i1.12417
Piacentini, V., Simões, A. R., & Vieira, R. M. (2017). The language focus of science education integrated with English learning. Enseñanza de Las Ciencias, Extra(2017), 399-404. https://ddd.uab.cat/record/184622
Piacentini, V., Simões, A. R., & Vieira, R. M. (2018). What students tell teachers about practices that integrate Subjects with English in a lower secondary school in Portugal. e-TEALS, 9(s1), 57-76. https://doi.org/10.2478/eteals-2018-0013
Piacentini, V., Simões, A. R., & Vieira, R. M. (2019). Teachers’ view of Language(s) in (CLIL) Science education: A case study in Portugal. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 77(5), 636-649. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/19.77.636
Polias, J. (2016). Apprenticing students into science: Doing, talking, and writing scientifically. Lexis Education.
Roberts, D. A., & Bybee, R. W. (2014). Scientific literacy, science literacy, and science education. In N. G. Lederman, & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education volume II (pp. 545-558). Routledge.
Salehjee, S., & Watts, M. (2020). Becoming scientific: Developing science across the life-course. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Seah, L. H., & Silver, R. E. (2018). Attending to science language demands in multilingual classrooms: A case study. International Journal of Science Education, 42(14), 2453-2471. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1504177
Simões, A. R., Pinho, S. A., Costa, M. A., & Costa, R. A. (2013). The Project English Plus: A CLIL approach in a Portuguese school. Indagatio Didatica, 5(4), 30-51. https://doi.org/10.34624/id.v5i4.4280
Stake, R. E. (1994). Case studies. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 236-247). SAGE.
Valdés-Sánchez, L., & Espinet, M. (2020). Coteaching in a science-CLIL classroom: Changes in discursive interaction as evidence of an English teacher’s science-CLIL professional identity development. International Journal of Science Education, 42(14), 2426-2452. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1710873
Vieira, R. M. (2018). Didática das ciências para o ensino básico [Science teaching methods for primary school levels]. Sílabas & Desafios.
Wellington, J., & Osborne, J. (2001). Language and literacy in science education. Open University Press.
Wolff, D. (2012). The European framework for CLIL teacher education. Synergies Italie, (8), 105-116. http://gerflint.fr/Base/Italie8/dieter_wolff.pdf
Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research. Designs and methods. SAGE.

How to cite this article

APA

Piacentini, V., Marques Vieira, R., & Simões, A. R. (2022). Can “Integrated Learning” with English support science education? A case study in Portugal. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(6), em2114. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12069

Vancouver

Piacentini V, Marques Vieira R, Simões AR. Can “Integrated Learning” with English support science education? A case study in Portugal. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2022;18(6):em2114. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12069

AMA

Piacentini V, Marques Vieira R, Simões AR. Can “Integrated Learning” with English support science education? A case study in Portugal. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2022;18(6), em2114. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12069

Chicago

Piacentini, Valentina, Rui Marques Vieira, and Ana Raquel Simões. "Can “Integrated Learning” with English support science education? A case study in Portugal". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2022 18 no. 6 (2022): em2114. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12069

Harvard

Piacentini, V., Marques Vieira, R., and Simões, A. R. (2022). Can “Integrated Learning” with English support science education? A case study in Portugal. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(6), em2114. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12069

MLA

Piacentini, Valentina et al. "Can “Integrated Learning” with English support science education? A case study in Portugal". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 18, no. 6, 2022, em2114. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12069