Competencies in Mathematical Modelling Tasks: An Error Analysis

Hanti Kotze

doi:10.29333/ejmste/91922

Full Text (PDF)

Hanti Kotze ¹ ^*

More Detail

¹ University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, SOUTH AFRICA^* Corresponding Author

Abstract

This paper aimed to investigate the type of modelling task that may elicit competencies that are more aligned with demands from the biomedical technology industry. The inquiry identified strengths and weaknesses in students’ modelling competencies by analysing errors in two types of modelling tasks: atomistic and holistic. By using subtasks, errors could be identified according to the Newman error categories and compared with six modelling competencies according to the framework of Blum and Leiß. First-year biomedical technology students at a South African university made more errors in interpreting, validating and presenting, these being modelling competencies required to convert mathematical results to real-world results. The findings indicated that competencies embedded in atomistic tasks are more relevant to workplace demands in the local setting than those elicited in holistic modelling tasks. The implications for classroom practices are discussed.

Keywords

biomedical technology
mathematical modelling
error analysis
atomistic
modelling
holistic modelling

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Research Article

EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed, 2018, Volume 14, Issue 8, Article No: em1567

https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/91922

Publication date: 02 Jun 2018

Article Views: 2349

Article Downloads: 1131

Open Access References How to cite this article

References

Blomhøj. M., & Jensen, T. H. (2003). Developing mathematical modelling competence: conceptual clarification and educational planning. Teaching Mathematics and its Applications, 22(3), 123–140. https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/22.3.123.
Blum, W., & Leiß, D. (2007). How do students and teachers deal with modelling problems? In C. Haines, P. Galbraith, W. Blum, & S. Kahn (Eds.), Mathematical modelling: Education, Engineering and Economics – ICTMA 12 (pp. 222–231). Chichester: Horwood Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1533/9780857099419.5.221.
Freudenthal, H. (1991). Revisiting mathematics education. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Gainsburg, J. (2013). Learning to model in engineering. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 15(4), 259–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2013.830947.
Galbraith, P., & Stillman, G. (2006). A framework for identifying student blockages during transitions in the modelling process. ZDM Mathematics Education, 28(2), 143–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02655886.
Gravemeijer, K., Stephan, M., Julie, C., Lin, F., & Ohtani, M. (2017). What mathematics education may prepare students for the society of the future? International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15, 105–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9814-6.
Harris, T. R., Bransford, J. D., & Brophy, S. P. (2002). Roles for learning sciences and learning technologies in biomedical engineering education: a review of recent advances. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering, 4, 29–48. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.bioeng.4.091701.125502.
Huang, Q. R. (2007). Competencies for graduate curricula in health, medical and biomedical informatics: a framework. Health Informatics Journal, 13(2), 89–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/1460458207076465.
Humphrey, J. D., Coté, G. L., Walton, J. R., Meininger, G. A., & Laine, G. A. (2005). A new paradigm for graduate research and training in the biomedical sciences and engineering. Advances in Physiology Education, 29(2), 98–102. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00053.2004.
Khan, T., Desjardins, J., Reba, M., Breazel, E., & Viktorova, I. (2013). Quantitative methods in biomedical applications: creative inquiry and digital-learning environments to engage and mentor STEM students in mathematics. In J. Rychtář, R. Shivaji, S. Gupta, & M. Chhetri (Eds.), Topics from the 8th annual UNCG regional mathematics and statistics conference, Springer Proceedings in Mathematics and Statistics 64 (pp. 15–24). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9332-7_3.
Kotze, H., Jacobs, G., & Spangenberg, E. (2015). Attitudes of biomedical technology students towards mathematical modelling. Proceedings of the ISTE International Conference on Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 25 – 29 October, Mopani Camp, Kruger National Park, South Africa, 136-148.
Lave, J. (1996). Teaching, as learning, in practice. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 3(3), 149–164. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327884mca0303_2.
Magjarevic, R., Lackovic, I., Bliznakov, Z., & Pallikarakis, N. (2010). Challenges of the biomedical engineering education in Europe. Proceedings of the 32nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE EMBS, Buenos Aires, Argentina, August 31 – September 4, 2959-2962. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMBS.2010.5626263.
Makonye, J. P. (2011). Learner mathematical errors in introductory differential calculus tasks: a study of misconceptions in the senior school certificate examinations (PhD thesis), University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Mantas, J., Ammenwerth, E., Demiris, G., Hasman, A., Haux, R., Hersh, W., Hovenga, E., Lun, K. C., Marin, H. Martin-Sanchez, F., & Wright, G. (2010). International Medical Informatics Association (IMIA) on education in health and medical informatics – 1st revision. Methods of Information in Medicine, 49(2), 105–120. https://doi.org/10.3414/ME5119.
Newman, M. A. (1977). An analysis of sixth-grade pupils’ errors on written mathematical tasks. Victorian Institute for Educational Research Bulletin, 39, 31–43.
Schoenfeld, A. (2001). Reflections on an impoverished education. In L.A. Steen (Ed.), Mathematics and democracy: the case for a quantitative literacy (pp. 49–54). National Council on Education and the Disciplines.
Schraw, G. (2013). Conceptual integration and measurement of epistemological and ontological beliefs in educational research, Review article, Hindawi Publishing Corporation ISRN Education, Volume 2013, Article ID 327680. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/327680.
Stoddart, T., Abrams, R., Gasper, E., & Canaday, D. (2000). Concept maps as assessment in science inquiry learning - a report of methodology. International Journal of Science Education, 22(12), 1221–1246. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006900750036235.
University of Johannesburg (2017). Faculty of Science, Doornfontein campus, Rules and regulations for undergraduate programmes. Retrieved from https://www.uj.ac.za/science.
Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. (2005). The role of contexts in assessments. For the Learning of Mathematics, 25(2), 2–9.
Wijaya, A., van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., Doorman, M., & Robitzsch, A. (2014). Difficulties in solving context-based PISA mathematics tasks: an analysis of students’ errors. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 11(3), 555–584.

How to cite this article

APA

Kotze, H. (2018). Competencies in Mathematical Modelling Tasks: An Error Analysis. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(8), em1567. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/91922

Vancouver

Kotze H. Competencies in Mathematical Modelling Tasks: An Error Analysis. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2018;14(8):em1567. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/91922

AMA

Kotze H. Competencies in Mathematical Modelling Tasks: An Error Analysis. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2018;14(8), em1567. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/91922

Chicago

Kotze, Hanti. "Competencies in Mathematical Modelling Tasks: An Error Analysis". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2018 14 no. 8 (2018): em1567. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/91922

Harvard

Kotze, H. (2018). Competencies in Mathematical Modelling Tasks: An Error Analysis. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(8), em1567. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/91922

MLA

Kotze, Hanti "Competencies in Mathematical Modelling Tasks: An Error Analysis". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 14, no. 8, 2018, em1567. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/91922