Dialogic Teaching Approach vis-à-vis Middle School Physics Teacher’s Content Knowledge

Deresse Terfa Leta; Mulugeta Atinafu Ayele; Vanessa Kind

doi:10.29333/ejmste/9613

Full Text (PDF)

Deresse Terfa Leta ¹ ^* , Mulugeta Atinafu Ayele ², Vanessa Kind ³

More Detail

¹ Kotebe Metropolitan University, ETHIOPIA² Addis Ababa University, ETHIOPIA³ Durham University, UK^* Corresponding Author

Abstract

This study aimed to explore Ethiopian middle school physics teachers’ content knowledge (CK) and their implementation of Dialogic teaching (DT). A qualitative method, case study design, and purposive and convenient sampling employed in the study. Data collected using Classroom observation and Questionnaire from nine physics teachers. The comparative analysis used to compare teachers’ implementation of DT. The results have indicated that the teachers’ CK was limited. Every teacher has had misconceptions, and a lack of procedural knowledge in physics contents and some teachers’ misconceptions were severe. None of the teachers fully implement dialogic teaching in their class. However, teachers who have training on DT and a higher level of CK relatively demonstrated DT better than teachers who have no training and have lower CK, respectively. The teacher education program recommended choosing a concurrent teacher education model, incorporating middle school physics in their curriculum for pre-service teachers, and making pre-service teachers practice dialogic teaching.

Keywords

case study
comparative analysis
content knowledge
dialogic teaching

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Research Article

EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed, 2021, Volume 17, Issue 1, Article No: em1936

https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9613

Publication date: 20 Jan 2021

Article Views: 1553

Article Downloads: 1183

Open Access Disclosures References How to cite this article

Disclosure

Declaration of Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest is declared by author(s).

Data sharing statement: Data supporting the findings and conclusions are available upon request from the corresponding author(s).

References

Aklilu, D., Alemayehu, T-M., & Mekasha, K. (2008). The structure and content of secondary school teacher education programs: international and national experiences. Journal of Education for Development, 2(2), 1-57.
Alemu, M., Kind, P., Tadesse, M., Atnafu, M., & Michael, K. (2017). Challenges of science teacher education in low-income nations-The case Ethiopia. Part 13: Strand 13, 1782.
Alexander, R. (2006). Towards dialogic teaching. York: Dialogos.
Alexander, R. J. (2008). Towards dialogic teaching: Rethinking classroom talk. Dialogos York.
Bakhtin, M. (1981). The dialogic imagination, trans. Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist (Austin: University of Texas Press, 1981), 69.
Ball, D. L. (1989). Teaching mathematics for understanding: What do teachers need to know about the subject matter?. National Center for Research in Teacher Education.
Barbara, B., Alain, M., & Ramahatra, R. (2003). Achieving universal primary education by 2015: A chance for every child. The World.
Brown, D. E. (1989). Students’ concept of force: the importance of understanding Newton’s third law. Physics Education, 24(6), 353. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/24/6/007
Clement, J. (1982). Students’ preconceptions in introductory mechanics. American Journal of Physics, 50(1), 66-71. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.12989
Crowell, B. (2001). Newtonian physics (Vol. 1): Light and Matter.
Crowell, B. (2003). Conservation laws (Vol. 2): Light and Matter.
Deakin Crick, R., Coates, M., Taylor, M., & Ritchie, S. (2004). A systematic review of the impact of citizenship education on the provision of schooling, Research Evidence in Education Library (REEL) (London, EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education).
Fadaei, A. S., & Moran, C. (2015). An investigation about misconceptions in force and motion in high school. US-china education review, 5(1), 38-45. https://doi.org/10.17265/2161-623X/2015.01.004
Forrester, P. A., & Chinnappan, M. (2010). The predominance of procedural knowledge in fractions, 185-192. Retrieved from https://ro.uow.edu.au/edupapers/770
Gillies, R. M. (2016). Dialogic interactions in the cooperative classroom. International Journal of Educational Research, 76, 178-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2015.02.009
Groth, R. E., & Bergner, J. A. (2006). Preservice elementary teachers’ conceptual and procedural knowledge of mean, median, and mode. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 8(1), 37-63. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327833mtl0801_3
Guerriero, S. (2015). Teachers’ pedagogical knowledge and the teaching profession: Background report and project objectives. Better Policies for Better Lives, 1-7.
Halloun, I. A., & Hestenes, D. (1985). The initial knowledge state of college physics students. American Journal of Physics, 53(11), 1043-1055. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.14030
Hestenes, D., Wells, M., & Swackhamer, G. (1992). Force concept inventory. The physics teacher, 30(3), 141-158. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2343497
Kumpulainen, K., & Rajala, A. (2017). Dialogic teaching and students’ discursive identity negotiation in the learning of science. Learning and Instruction, 48, 23-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.05.002
Lark, A. C. (2007). Student misconceptions in Newtonian mechanics. (Doctoral dissertation, Bowling Green State University).
Lyle, S. (2008). Dialogic teaching: Discussing theoretical contexts and reviewing evidence from classroom practice. Language and education, 22(3), 222-240. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500780802152499
MacMillan, J., & Schumacher, S. (2006). Research in education–Evidence-based Inquiry . International Edition: Boston: Pearson Education Inc. Pergamous Press.
Ministry of Education (MoE) (1994). Education and training policy. Addis Ababa Ethiopia: Ministry of Education.
Ministry of Education (MoE) (2002). The education and training policy and its implementation. Addis Ababa Ethiopia: Ministry of Education.
Ministry of Education (MoE) (2009). Curriculum Framework for Ethiopian Education (KG–Grade 12). Addis Ababa Ethiopia: Ministry of Education.
Poutot, G., & Blandin, B. (2015). Exploration of Students’ Misconceptions in Mechanics using the FCI. American Journal of Educational Research, 3(2), 116-120. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-3-2-2
Rayner, P., & Ashcroft, K. (2011). Ethiopian higher education: Expansion, dilemmas and quality. World education news and reviews, 1.
Reznitskaya, A. (2012). Dialogic teaching: Rethinking language use during literature discussions. The reading teacher. 65(7), 446-456. https://doi.org/10.1002/TRTR.01066
Semela, T. (2010). Who Is Joining Physics and Why? Factors Influencing the Choice of Physics among Ethiopian University Students. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 5(3), 319-340.
Serway, R., Faughn, J., & Vuille, Chris (2008). College Physics. Cengage Learning.
Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational researcher, 15(2), 4-14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004
Talbert, J. E. (1993). Understanding Context Effects on Secondary School Teaching. Teachers College Record. 95(1), 45-68.
Tchoshanov, M., Lesser, L. M., and Salazar, J. (2008). Teacher knowledge and student achievement: Revealing patterns. NCSM Journal, 38, 39-49
Thijs, G. D. (1992). Evaluation of an introductory course on” force” considering students’ preconceptions. Science Education, 76(2), 155-74. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730760205
Thornton, R. K., & Sokoloff, D. R. (1998). Assessing student learning of Newton’s laws: The force and motion conceptual evaluation and the evaluation of active learning laboratory and lecture curricula. American Journal of physics, 66(4), 338-352. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18863
Ugwuadu, O. (2013). Effects of democratic and authoritative discourse patterns on students’ achievement in biology in mubi educational zone of adamawa state. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education, 2(3), 18-23. https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-0231823
Woldetsadik, G. (2013). National Learning Assessment in Ethiopia: sharing experiences and lessons. HD Learning Week. AFTEE, The World Bank.

How to cite this article

APA

Leta, D. T., Ayele, M. A., & Kind, V. (2021). Dialogic Teaching Approach vis-à-vis Middle School Physics Teacher’s Content Knowledge. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(1), em1936. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9613

Vancouver

Leta DT, Ayele MA, Kind V. Dialogic Teaching Approach vis-à-vis Middle School Physics Teacher’s Content Knowledge. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2021;17(1):em1936. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9613

AMA

Leta DT, Ayele MA, Kind V. Dialogic Teaching Approach vis-à-vis Middle School Physics Teacher’s Content Knowledge. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2021;17(1), em1936. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9613

Chicago

Leta, Deresse Terfa, Mulugeta Atinafu Ayele, and Vanessa Kind. "Dialogic Teaching Approach vis-à-vis Middle School Physics Teacher’s Content Knowledge". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2021 17 no. 1 (2021): em1936. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9613

Harvard

Leta, D. T., Ayele, M. A., and Kind, V. (2021). Dialogic Teaching Approach vis-à-vis Middle School Physics Teacher’s Content Knowledge. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(1), em1936. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9613

MLA

Leta, Deresse Terfa et al. "Dialogic Teaching Approach vis-à-vis Middle School Physics Teacher’s Content Knowledge". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 17, no. 1, 2021, em1936. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9613