Effects of Grade Level and Object Size on Students’ Measurement Estimation Performance

Hsin-Mei E. Huang

doi:10.29333/ejmste/9342

Full Text (PDF)

Hsin-Mei E. Huang ¹ ^*

More Detail

¹ University of Taipei, Taipei, Taiwan, REPUBLIC OF CHINA^* Corresponding Author

Abstract

The current study examined the effects of grade level and object size on the ability to estimate the measurement of objects. Fifth- (n = 198) and sixth-grade (n = 208) students and freshman undergraduate students (n = 71) from Taipei city, Taiwan, participated in the study. The findings indicated a tendency for measurement estimation ability to increase with grade level. Overall, estimation performance was most accurate with medium-sized to-be-estimated objects (TBEOs), while estimates of small-sized TBEOs were more accurate than those of large-sized TBEOs. A tendency to underestimate the measurements of large-sized TBEOs was observed in all groups. Those with good estimation abilities showed a preference for using body parts and convenient objects as references. Moreover, the integration of measurement units constructed from previous experience and eyeballing was an essential skill used by good estimators. Suggestions for measurement estimation instruction are discussed.

Keywords

estimation strategy
grade
measurement estimation
object size

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Research Article

EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed, 2020, Volume 16, Issue 12, Article No: em1923

https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9342

Publication date: 28 Dec 2020

Article Views: 1647

Article Downloads: 1146

Open Access References How to cite this article

References

Bright, G. W. (1979). Estimating physical measurement. School Science and Mathematics, 79(8), 581-586. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1979.tb13900.x
Coburn, T. G. (1987). Estimation and mental computation: Measurement estimation-making adjustments. Arithmetic Teacher, 34(7), 24-25. https://doi.org/10.5951/AT.34.7.0024
Desli, D., & Giakoumi, M. (2017). Children’s length estimation performance and strategies in standard and nonstandard units of measurement. International Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 7(3), 61-84.
Forrester, M. A., & Shire, B. (1994). The influence of object size, dimension and prior context on children’s estimation ability. Educational Psychology, 14(4), 451-465. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144341940140407
Forrester, M. A., Latham, J., & Shire, B. (1990). Exploring estimation in young primary school children. Educational Psychology, 10, 283-300. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144341900100401
Gooya, Z., Khosroshahi, L. G., & Teppo, A. R. (2011). Iranian students’ measurement estimation performance involving linear and area attributes of real-world objects. ZDM The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 43, 709-722. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-011-0338-1
Hildreth, D. J. (1983). The use of strategies in estimating measurements. Arithmetic Teacher, 30, 50-54. https://doi.org/10.5951/AT.30.5.0050
Huang, H.-M. E. (2016). Investigation of the performance and use of strategy among elementary school children in estimating measurement of length, area, and volume. Journal of Research in Education Science, 61(3), 131-162. (In Chinese)
Huang, H.-M. E., Heinze, A., Ruwisch, S., Hoth, J., & Chang, H.-W. (2019). Investigating grade 7-9 students’ performance of length estimation. In A., Rogerson, & J. Morska (Eds.) (2019). Proceedings of the 15th International Conference of Theory and practice: An interface or a great divide? (pp. 223-228). Kildare, Ireland: Maynooth University.
Jones, G., & Taylor, A. (2009). Developing a sense of scale: Looking backward. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(4), 460-475. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20288
Jones, G., Taylor, A., & Broadwell, B. (2009). Estimating linear size and scale: Body rulers. International Journal of Science Education, 31(11), 1495-1509. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802101976
Jones, M. G., Forrester, J. H., Gardner, G. E., Andre, T., & Taylor, A. R. (2012). Students’ accuracy of measurement estimation: Context, units, and logical thinking. School Science and Mathematics, 112(3), 171-178. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00130.x
Jones, M. G., Tretter, T., Taylor, A., & Oppewal, T. (2008). Experienced and novices teachers’ concepts of spatial scale. International Journal of Science Education, 30(3), 409-429. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701416624
Joram, E., Gabriele, A., Bertheau, M., Gelman, R., & Subrahmanyam, K. (2005). Children’s use of the reference point strategy for measurement estimation. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 36(1), 4-23.
Joram, E., Subrahmanyam, K., & Gelman, R. (1998). Measurement estimation: Learning to map the route from number to quantity and back. Review of Educational Research, 68, 413-419. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543068004413
Lehrer, R. (2003). Developing understanding of measurement. In J. Kilpatrick, W. G. Martin, & D. Schifter (Eds.), A research companion to principles and standards for school mathematics (pp. 179-192). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Ministry of Education (2010). Grade 1-9 curriculum for junior-high school and elementary school: Mathematics (3rd ed.). (In Chinese.) Taipei, Taiwan: The Author.
Ministry of Education (2018). Curriculum guidelines of 12-year basic education: Mathematics. (In Chinese.) Taipei, Taiwan: The Author.
Montague, M., & Van Garderen, D. (2003). A cross-sectional study of mathematics achievement, estimation skills, and academic self-perception in students of varying ability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36(5), 437-488. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194030360050501
National Center for Educational Statistics (2013). NAEP questions (Question ID 2013-4M3 #10 M1461E1). Retrieved from National Center for Educational Statistics Website: https://nces.ed.gov/NationsReportCard/nqt/Search
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2006). Curriculum focal points for prekindergarten through grade 8 mathematics: A quest for coherence. Reston, VA: The Author.
Pike, C. D., & Forrester, M. A. (1997). The influence of number-sense on children’s ability to estimate measures. Educational Psychology, 17(4), 483-500. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144341970170408
Ruwisch, S., & Huang, H.-M. E. (2018). Length measurement and estimation in primary school- A comparison of the curricula of Taiwan and Germany. In F.-J. Hsieh (Ed.). Proceedings of the 8^th ICMI-East Asia Regional Conference on Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 269-280). Taipei, Taiwan: National Taiwan Normal University.
Ruwisch, S., Heid, M., & Weiher, D. F. (2015). Children’s uses of strategies in estimating length and capacity. In Beswick, K., Muir, T., & Wells, J. (Eds.). Proceedings of 39th Psychology of Mathematics Education Conference (Vol. 1, pp. 246). Hobart, Australia: PME.
Ryan, J., & Williams, J. (2007). Children’s mathematics 4-15: Learning from errors and misconceptions. Berkshire, England: Open University Press.
Sternberg, R. J., & Sternberg, K. (2017). Cognitive psychology (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
Swan, M., & Jones, O. (1980). Comparison of students’ percepts of distances, weight, height, area, and temperature. Science Education, 64, 297-307. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730640305
Tretter, T. R., Jones, M. G., & Minogue, J. (2006). Accuracy of scale conceptions in science: Mental maneuverings across many orders of spatial magnitude. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(10), 1061-1085. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20155
Tretter, T. R., Jones, M. G., Andre, T., Negishi, A., & Minogue, J. (2006). Conceptual boundaries and distances: Students’ and experts’ concepts of the scale of scientific phenomena. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(3), 282-319. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20123

How to cite this article

APA

Huang, H.-M. E. (2020). Effects of Grade Level and Object Size on Students’ Measurement Estimation Performance. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(12), em1923. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9342

Vancouver

Huang HME. Effects of Grade Level and Object Size on Students’ Measurement Estimation Performance. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2020;16(12):em1923. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9342

AMA

Huang HME. Effects of Grade Level and Object Size on Students’ Measurement Estimation Performance. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2020;16(12), em1923. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9342

Chicago

Huang, Hsin-Mei E.. "Effects of Grade Level and Object Size on Students’ Measurement Estimation Performance". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2020 16 no. 12 (2020): em1923. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9342

Harvard

Huang, H.-M. E. (2020). Effects of Grade Level and Object Size on Students’ Measurement Estimation Performance. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(12), em1923. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9342

MLA

Huang, Hsin-Mei E. "Effects of Grade Level and Object Size on Students’ Measurement Estimation Performance". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 16, no. 12, 2020, em1923. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9342