Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

• Alles, D.L. (2001). Using Evolution as the Framework for Teaching Biology. American Biology Teacher, 63, 20–23.
• Akyol, G., Tekkaya C. & Sungur, S. (2010). The contribution of understandings of evolutionary theory and nature of science to pre-service science teachers’ acceptance of evolutionary theory. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 1889–1893
• Akyol, G., Tekkaya C. & Sungur, S. (2012). Examination of pre-service science teachers’ perceptions and understanding of evolution in relation to sociodemographic variables. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 167-172.
• Athanasiou, K., Katakos, E. & Papadopoulou P. (2012) Conceptual ecology of the evolution acceptance among Greek education students: what is the contribution of knowledge increase? Journal of Biological Education, 46(4),234-241.
• Athanasiou, K. & Papadopoulou, P. (2012) Conceptual ecology of the evolution acceptance among Greek education students: knowledge, religious practices and social influences. International Journal of Science Education, 34(6), 903-924.
• Bishop, B.A., & Anderson, C.W. (1990). Student conceptions of natural selection and its role in evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 415–427.
• Cobern, W.W. (1994). Point: Belief, Understanding, and the Teaching of Evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 583-590.
• Costa, V.B. (1995). When science is ‘‘another world’’: Relationships between worlds of family, friends, school, and science. Science Education, 79, 313–333.
• Krimbas, C. (2012). The reception of Darwinism in Greece. Plenary lecture in the 5th ICESHS. http://www.blod.gr/lectures/Pages/viewlecture.aspx?L ectureID=611
• Demastes-Southerland, S., Good, R., & Peebles, P. (1995). Students’ conceptual ecologies and the process of conceptual change in evolution. Science Education, 79, 637–666.
• Deniz, H., Donnelly, L. & Yilmaz, I. (2008). Exploring the Factors Related to Acceptance of Evolutionary Theory Among Turkish Preservice Biology Teachers: Toward a More Informative Conceptual Ecology for Biological Evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 420– 443.
• Deniz, H. F. Ηetin, I. Yılmaz (2011). Examining the Relationships among Acceptance of Evolution, Religiosity, and Teaching Preference for Evolution in Turkish Preservice Biology Teachers, RNCSE 31.4, 1.1- 1.9.
• Dole, J. A., & Sinatra, G. M. (1998). Reconceptualising change in the cognitive construction of knowledge. Educational Psychologist, 33(2/3), 109–128.
• European Barometer: Wikipedia (2009). Religion in Europe: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_Europe.
• Eurobarometer (Special), biotechnology, page 204" (PDF). Fieldwork: Jan-Feb 2010. http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_ 341_en.pdf .]
• Gregoire, M. (2003). Is it a challenge or a threat? A dualprocess model of teachers’ cognition and appraisal processes during conceptual change. Educational Psychology Review, 15(2), 147–179.
• Kampourakis K, & Zogza V. (2007). Students' preconceptions about evolution: How accurate is the characterization as “Lamarckian” when considering the history of evolutionary thought? Science and Education, 16, 393–422.
• Kampourakis, K. & V. Zogza (2009). Preliminary Evolutionary Explanations: A Basic Framework for Conceptual Change and Explanatory Coherence in Evolution. Science & Education, 18, 1313–1340.
• Lawson, A.E. (1999). A scientific approach to teaching about evolution and special creation. American Biology Teacher, 61, 266–274.
• Lawson, A.E., & Worsnop, W.A. (1992). Learning about evolution and rejecting a belief in special creation: Effects of reflective reasoning skill, prior knowledge, prior belief and religious commitment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 143–166.
• Lemke, J.L. (2001). Articulating Communities: Sociocultural Perspectives on Science Education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 296–316.
• Miller, J.D., Scott, E.C. & Okamoto, S. (2006). Public acceptance of evolution. Science, 313, 765-766.
• Miller, J.D., Scott E. C. and Okamoto S. (2006). Supporting Online Material for Public Acceptance of Evolution. www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/313/5789/765/ DC1
• National Research Council (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
• Peker D., Comert , G. G., Kence, A.(2010) Three Decades of Anti-evolution Campaign and its Results: Turkish Undergraduates’ Acceptance and Understanding of the Biological Evolution Theory. Science and Education, 19, 739–755.
• Pintrich, P.R. (1999). Motivational beliefs as resources for and constraints on conceptual change. In Schnotz, W., Vosniadou, S., & Carretero, M. (Eds.). New perspectives on conceptual change (pp. 33–50). New York: Pergamon.
• Pope John Paul II (1996). Message delivered to the Pontifical Academy of Sciences 22 October 1996.
• Posner, G.J., Strike, K.A., Hewson, P.W., & Gertzog, W.A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66, 211–227.
• Rutledge, M.L., & Warden, M.A. (1999). Development and validation of the measure of acceptance of the theory of evolution instrument. School Science and Mathematics, 99, 13–18.
• Rutledge, M.L., & Warden, M.A. (2000). Science and high school biology teachers: Critical relationships. American Biology Teacher, 62, 23–31.
• Sa, W.C., West, R.F., & Stanovich, K.E. (1999). The domain specificity and generality of belief bias: Searching for a generalizable critical thinking skill. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 497–510.
• Sayin, U., & Kence, A. (1999). Islamic scientific creationism: A new challenge in Turkey. Reports of the National Center for Science Education, 19, 18–20, 25–29.
• Scott, E.C. (2000). Not (Just) in Kansas Anymore. Science, 288, no. 5467, 813 – 815.
• Sinatra, G.M. & Pintrich, P.R. (2003). Intentional conceptual change. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Sinatra, G.M., Southerland, S.A., McConaughy, F., & Demastes, J.W. (2003). Intentions and beliefs in students’ understanding and acceptance of biological evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 510– 528.
• Smith, M.U., Siegel, H., & McInerney, J.D. (1995). Foundational issues in evolution education. Science & Education, 4, 23–46.
• Southerland, S.A. & Sinatra, G. M. (2005). The shifting roles of acceptance and dispositions in understanding biological evolution. In Alsop S. (ed.) Beyond Cartesian Dualism: Encountering Affect in the Teaching and Learning of Science, Springer, Dordrecht: Springer, 69–78.
• Southerland, S.A., Sinatra, G and Matthews, M.R.(2001). Belief, Knowledge, and Science Education. Educational Psychology Review, 13(4), 325-351.
• Stanovich, K.E., & West, R.F. (1997). Reasoning independently of prior belief and individual differences in actively open-minded thinking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 342–357.
• Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2007). Natural myside bias is independent of cognitive ability. Thinking & Reasoning, 13, 225-247.
• Strike, K., & Posner, G.J. (1992). A revisionist theory of conceptual change. In R.A. Duschl & R.J. Hamilton (Eds.), Philosophy of science, cognitive psychology, and educational theory and practice (pp. 147–176). New York: State University of New York.
• Toulmin, S. (1972). Human understanding: An inquiry into the aims of science. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
• Wood, P.K., & Kardash, C. (2002). Critical elements in the design of critical thinking studies. In B.K. Hofer & P.R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

APA

Athanasiou, K., & Papadopoulou, P. (2015). Evolution Theory Teaching and Learning: What Conclusions Can We Get From Comparisons of Teachers’ and Students’ Conceptual Ecologies in Greece and Turkey?. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(4), 841-853. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1443a

Vancouver

Athanasiou K, Papadopoulou P. Evolution Theory Teaching and Learning: What Conclusions Can We Get From Comparisons of Teachers’ and Students’ Conceptual Ecologies in Greece and Turkey?. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2015;11(4):841-53. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1443a

AMA

Athanasiou K, Papadopoulou P. Evolution Theory Teaching and Learning: What Conclusions Can We Get From Comparisons of Teachers’ and Students’ Conceptual Ecologies in Greece and Turkey?. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2015;11(4), 841-853. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1443a

Chicago

Athanasiou, Kyriacos, and Penelope Papadopoulou. "Evolution Theory Teaching and Learning: What Conclusions Can We Get From Comparisons of Teachers’ and Students’ Conceptual Ecologies in Greece and Turkey?". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2015 11 no. 4 (2015): 841-853. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1443a

Harvard

Athanasiou, K., and Papadopoulou, P. (2015). Evolution Theory Teaching and Learning: What Conclusions Can We Get From Comparisons of Teachers’ and Students’ Conceptual Ecologies in Greece and Turkey?. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(4), pp. 841-853. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1443a

MLA

Athanasiou, Kyriacos et al. "Evolution Theory Teaching and Learning: What Conclusions Can We Get From Comparisons of Teachers’ and Students’ Conceptual Ecologies in Greece and Turkey?". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 11, no. 4, 2015, pp. 841-853. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1443a