Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

• Assaraf, O. B.-Z., & Orion, N. (2010). System thinking skills at the elementary school level. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(5), 540–563. http://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20351.
• Atmatzidou, S., & Demetriadis, S. (2016). Advancing students’ computational thinking skills through educational robotics: A study on age and gender relevant differences. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 75, 661–670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2015.10.008.
• Banilower, E. R., Smith, P. S., Weiss, I. R., Malzahn, K. A., Campbell, K. M., & Weis, A. M. (2013). Report of the 2012 National Survey of Science and Mathematics Education. Horizon Research, Inc. (NJ1).
• Barr, V., & Stephenson, C. (2011). Bringing computational thinking to K-12: What is Involved and what is the role of the computer science education community? ACM Inroads, 2(1), 48-54. https://doi.org/10.1145/1929887.1929905.
• Berland, M., & Wilensky, U. (2015). Comparing virtual and physical robotics environments for supporting complex systems and computational thinking. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(5), 628-647. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-015-9552-x.
• Breslyn, W., Drewes, A., McGinnis, J. R., Hestness, E., & Mouza, C. (2017). Development of an Empirically-Based Conditional Learning Progression for Climate Change. Science Education International, 28(3), 214–223.
• Breslyn, W., McGinnis, J. R., McDonald, R. C., & Hestness, E. (2016). Developing a learning progression for sea level rise, a major impact of climate change. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(10), 1471–1499. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21333.
• Climate Central (2018). [Interactive Map of Sea Level Rise Projection Based on Geographic Area]. Surging Seas: Mapping Choices. Retrieved from http://sealevel.climatecentral.org/.
• Cook, J., Oreskes, N., Doran, P. T., Anderegg, W. R., Verheggen, B., Maibach, E. W., … Green, S. A. (2016). Consensus on consensus: A synthesis of consensus estimates on human-caused global warming. Environmental Research Letters, 11(4), 048002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/4/048002.
• DiSessa, A. A. (2000). Changing minds: Computers, learning, and literacy. MIT Press.
• Drewes, A., Breslyn, W., McGinnis, R., Mouza, C., Hestness, E., & Henderson, J. (2017). Designing and Validating a Climate Change Knowledge Instrument. San Antonio, TX: Proposal Presented at American Educational Research Association Annual Conference.
• Evagorou, M., Korfiatis, K., Nicolaou, C., & Constantinou, C. (2009). An investigation of the potential of interactive simulations for developing system thinking skills in elementary school: a case study with fifth‐graders and sixth‐graders. International Journal of Science Education, 31(5), 655–674. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701749313.
• Hestness, E. McGinnis, J. R., Riedinger, K., & Marbach-Ad, G. (2011). A study of teacher candidates’ experiences investigating global climate change education within an elementary science methods course. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22, 351-369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-011-9234-3.
• Hill, D., & Redden, M. (1985). An investigation of the system concept. School Science and Mathematics, 85, 233–239. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1985.tb09616.x.
• Hokayem, H., & Gotwals, A. W. (2016). Early elementary students’ understanding of complex ecosystems: A learning progression approach. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(10), 1524–1545. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21336.
• Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: An overview. Theory into practice, 41(4), 212-218. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2.
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355.
• Loughran, J. (2014). Developing understandings of practice: Science teacher learning. Handbook of Research on Science Education, 2, 811–829. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203097267.ch40.
• McGinnis, J. R. & McDonald, C. (2011). Controversial or sensitive topics in science education: A Literature Review. University of Maryland MADE CLEAR Climate Change Learning Sciences Research Team. Retrieved on September 22, 2018 from http://www.climateedresearch.org/publications/2012/Lit%20Review-on-Controversial-Topics.pdf.
• McGinnis, J. R. (2018, March). Climate change education: What do we know and how might that assist the science classroom teacher? A keynote presented at Paleoscience Day, Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History, Washington, DC. Retrieved on September 6, 2018 from www.climateedresearch.org/smithsonian/McGinnisTalkClimateChangeEducationFINAL3.28.18.pdf.
• McGinnis, J. R., Hestness, E., & Riedinger, K. (2011). Changing science teacher education in a changing global climate: Telling a new story. In Jing Ling and R. Oxford (Eds.), Transformative Eco-Education for Human Survival: Environmental Education in A New Era (pp. 117-133). Charlotte, North Carolina: Information Age Publishing.
• McGinnis, J. R., McDonald, C., Breslyn, W. & Hestness, E. (March, 2017). Supporting the inclusion of climate change in U.S. science education curricula by use of learning progressions. In D. Shephardson, A. Roychoudury & A. Hirsch (Eds), Teaching and Learning about Climate Change: A Framework for Educators, pp. 135-151. Routledge, New York. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315629841.
• National Research Council. (2010). Report of a workshop on the scope and nature of computational thinking. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/12840.
• National Research Council. (2011). Report of a Workshop on the Pedagogical Aspects of Computational Thinking. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/13170.
• Next Generation Science Standards Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/18290.
• Parchmann, I., Gräsel, C., Baer, A., Nentwig, P., Demuth, R., & Ralle, B. (2006). “Chemie im Kontext”: A symbiotic implementation of a context‐based teaching and learning approach. International Journal of Science Education, 28(9), 1041–1062. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600702512.
• Plutzer, E., McCaffrey, M., Hannah, A. L., Rosenau, J., Berbeco, M., & Reid, A. H. (2016). Climate confusion among US teachers. Science, 351(6274), 664–665. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aab3907.
• Roychoudhury, A., Shepardson, D. P., Hirsch, A., Niyogi, D., Mehta, J., & Top, S. (2017). The need to introduce system thinking in teaching climate change. Science Educator, 25(2), 73.
• Sharma, A. (2012). Global climate change: What has science education got to do with it? Science & Education, 21(1), 33–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-011-9372-1.
• Shepardson, D. P., Niyogi, D., Choi, S., & Charusombat, U. (2009). Seventh grade students’ conceptions of global warming and climate change. Environmental Education Research, 15(5), 549–570. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620903114592.
• Shepardson, D. P., Niyogi, D., Roychoudhury, A., & Hirsch, A. (2012). Conceptualizing climate change in the context of a climate system: Implications for climate and environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 18(3), 323–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2011.622839.
• Shute, V. J., Sun, C., & Asbell-Clarke, J. (2017). Demystifying computational thinking. Educational Research Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.09.003.
• Stephenson, C., & Barr, V (2012). Defining Computational Thinking for K-12. In Computer Science Teachers Association (CSTA) and Association for Computing Machinery (ACM): Computer Science K-8: Building a Strong Foundation. CSTA & ACM: New York.
• Weintrop, D., Beheshti, E., Horn, M., Orton, K., Jona, K., Trouille, L., & Wilensky, U. (2016). Defining computational thinking for mathematics and science classrooms. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(1), 127-147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-015-9581-5.
• Wing, J. (2011). Research notebook: Computational thinking—What and why? The Link Newsletter, 6, 1–32. Retrieved from http://link.cs.cmu.edu/files/11-399_The_Link_Newsletter-3.pdf.
• Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33-35. https://doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215.

APA

Breslyn, W., & McGinnis, J. R. (2019). Investigating Preservice Elementary Science Teachers’ Understanding of Climate Change from a Computational Thinking Systems Perspective. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(6), em1696. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/103566

Vancouver

Breslyn W, McGinnis JR. Investigating Preservice Elementary Science Teachers’ Understanding of Climate Change from a Computational Thinking Systems Perspective. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2019;15(6):em1696. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/103566

AMA

Breslyn W, McGinnis JR. Investigating Preservice Elementary Science Teachers’ Understanding of Climate Change from a Computational Thinking Systems Perspective. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2019;15(6), em1696. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/103566

Chicago

Breslyn, Wayne, and J. Randy McGinnis. "Investigating Preservice Elementary Science Teachers’ Understanding of Climate Change from a Computational Thinking Systems Perspective". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2019 15 no. 6 (2019): em1696. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/103566

Harvard

Breslyn, W., and McGinnis, J. R. (2019). Investigating Preservice Elementary Science Teachers’ Understanding of Climate Change from a Computational Thinking Systems Perspective. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(6), em1696. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/103566

MLA

Breslyn, Wayne et al. "Investigating Preservice Elementary Science Teachers’ Understanding of Climate Change from a Computational Thinking Systems Perspective". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 15, no. 6, 2019, em1696. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/103566