Abstract
Because the development of Taiwanese Massive Open Online Course (MOOCs) websites is at this moment full of vitality, this research employs a series of analytical cross-measurements of Quality Function Deployment method of House of Quality (QFD-HOQ) model and Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methodology to cross-evaluate the weighted questionnaire results based on three major analytical perspectives (higher education student’s desires, online-learning technological functions and online-education scholar’s considerations) to assess the interplays between the WHATs (students’ online-learning interests) and the HOWs (the technological online-education measures), based on the higher research reliability and validity. According to the measured results, user’s completely unrestricted operation, convenience, connectionization, openness and course complete rate are the most decisive five technological online-education determinants of MOOCs websites based on weighted-measurements of expert’s questionnaire among WHATs and HOWs cross-evaluated matrix of QFD-HOQ model that academically resupplies to research gaps of MOOCs fields and empirically contributes to the relative industries.
License
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Article Type: Research Article
EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed, 2016, Volume 12, Issue 5, 1163-1188
https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1504a
Publication date: 20 Mar 2016
Article Views: 2300
Article Downloads: 1296
Open Access References How to cite this articleReferences
- Adamopoulos, G. I., & Pappis, C. P. (1996). A fuzzy-linguistic approach to multicriteria sequencing problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 92, 628–636. doi: 10.1016/0377-2217(95)00091-7
- Akao, Y. (1997).QFD: Past, present, and future. In Proceedings of the international symposium on QFD, 97, 1–12.
- Anderson, T., & McGreal, R. (2012). Disruptive pedagogies and technologies in universities. Education, Technology and Society, 15(4), 380–389.
- Ardis, M. A., & Henderson, P. B. (2012). Software engineering education (SEEd): Is software engineering ready for MOOCs? ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 37(5), 14–14. doi: 10.1145/2347696.2347720
- Bates, T. (2013). Harvard’s current thinking on MOOCs. Retrieved from http://tinyurl.com/a2uh86z
- BBC. (British Broadcasting Corporation) (2012). UK university applications down as fees rise. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-16787948
- Bell, F. (2010a). Connectivism: Its place in theory-informed research and innovation in technology-enabled learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(3), 98–118.
- Bell, F. (2010b). Network theories for technology-enabled learning and social change: Connectivism and actor network theory. In L. Dirckinck-Holmfeld, V. Hodgson, C. Jones, M. de Laat, D. McConnell & T. Ryberg (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Networked Learning 2010, 526–533.
- Bell, F. (2011c). Connectivism: Its place in theory-informed research and innovation in technology-enabled learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(3). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/902/1664
- Bevilacqua, M., Ciarapicab, F. E., & Giacchettab, G. (2006). A fuzzy-QFD approach to supplier selection. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 12, 14–27. doi:10.1016/j.pursup.2006.02.001
- Bonino, R. (2012). International student mobility: Status, trends and possible impact of elearning and social media, media applications for business, learning and society. VCOBAM Conference Proceedings, 3(1), 81–91.
- Bremer, C. (2012). New format for online courses: The open course future of learning. Proceedings of eLearning Baltics eLBa 2012, 63–90. Retrieved from http://www.bremer.cx/vortrag67/Artikel_elba2012_opco_bremer.pdf
- Budak, I., & Kaygin, B. (2015). An investigation of mathematically promising students’ cognitive abilities and their contributions to learning environment. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(1), 25–36.
- Bull, D. D. (2012). From ripple to tsunami: The possible impact of MOOCs on higher education. DEQuarterly, 10–11.
- Butin, D. W. (2012). What MIT should have done. eLearn Magazine. Retrieved from http://elearnmag.acm.org/featured.cfm?aid=2263018
- Cabiria, J. (2012). Connectivist learning environments: Massive open online courses. The 2012 World Congress in Computer Science Computer Engineering and Applied Computing, 16–19. Retrieved from http://elrond.informatik.tufreiberg.de/papers/WorldComp2012/EEE6065.pdf
- Campbell, T., Oh, P. S., Maughn, M., Kiriazis, N., & Zuwallack, R. (2015). A review of modeling pedagogies: Pedagogical functions, discursive acts, and technology in modeling instruction. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(1), 159–176. doi: 10.12973/eurasia.2015.1314a
- Carey, K., (2013). Obama, Rubio Agree on One Thing: Technology Could Fix the Higher Ed Mess. Retrieved from http://tinyurl.com/cogw2kh
- Casey, D. M. (2008). The historical development of distance education through technology. TechTrends, 52(2), 45–51. doi: 10.1007/s11528-008-0135-z
- Casey, J. (2012), Taking Care of Business? The political economy of MOOCs and Open Education. Retrieved from http://tinyurl.com/ao2agyc
- Chamberlin, L., & Parish, T. (2011). MOOCs: Massive open online courses or massive and often obtuse courses? eLearn Magazine, August 2011. Retrieved from http://elearnmag.acm.org/featured.cfm?aid=2016017
- Chan, K. K. (2015). Salient beliefs of secondary school mathematic teachers using dynamic geometry software. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(1), 139–148.
- Chang, Y. L., & Wu, H. K. (2015). A case study of increasing vocational high school teachers practices in designing interdisciplinary use of scientific inquiry in curriculum design. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(1), 37–51. doi: 10.12973/eurasia.2015.1304a
- Chen, S. H., Lin, H. T., & Lee, H. T. (2004). Enterprise partner selection for vocational education: Analytical Network Process. International Journal of Manpower, 25(7), 643– 655. doi: 10.1108/01437720410563980
- Christensen, C., Johnson, C., & Horn, M. B. (2008). Disrupting Class: How Disruptive Innovation Will Change the Way the World Learns. Retrieved from http://tinyurl.com/apnfhls
- Coursera. (2013). Five courses receive college credit recommendations. Retrieved from http://blog.coursera.org/post/42486198362/five-courses-receive-college-creditrecommendations
- Daniel, J. (2012). Making sense of MOOCs: Musings in a maze of myth, paradox and possibility. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2012(3). Retrieved from http://www.tonybates.ca/wp-content/uploads/Making-Sense-of-MOOCs.pdf
- Deng, J. (1982). Control problems of grey systems. Systems & Controls Letters, 5, 288–294. doi: 10.1016/S0167-6911(82)80025-X
- Deng, J. (1989). Introduction to grey system theory. The Journal of Grey System, 1, 1–24.
- Deng, J. (1993). Grey Control System (pp. 146–158). Wuhan: HUST Press.
- Deng, J. (2005). The Primary Methods of Grey System Theory (pp. 165). Wuhan: HUST Press.
- DeWaard, I. (2011). Explore a new learning frontier: MOOCs. Learning Solutions Magazine. Retrieved from http://www.learningsolutionsmag.com/articles/721/explore-a-newlearning-frontier-moocs/print
- DeWaard, I., Abajian, S., Gallagher, M. S., Hogue, R., Keskin, N., Koutropoulos, A., & Rodriguez, O. C. (2011). Using m-Learning and MOOCs to understand chaos, emergence, and complexity in education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(7), 94–115. Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1046/2043
- DeWaard, I., Koutropoulos, A., Keskin, N., Abajian, S. C., Hogue, R., Rodriguez, C. O., & Gallagher, M. S. (2011). Exploring the MOOC format as a pedagogical approach for mLearning. In Proceedings of 10th World Conference on Mobile and Contextual Learning, 138–145.
- Downes, S. (2007a). Models for sustainable open educational resources. Interdisciplinary Journal of Knowledge and Learning Objects, 3. Retrieved from http://www.ijklo.org/Volume3/IJKLOv3p029-044Downes.pdf
- Downes, S. (2007b). What connectivism is? Paper presented at the Connectivism Conference, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg. Retrieved from http://halfanhour.blogspot.com/2007/02/what-connectivism-is.html
- Eilks, I. (2015). Science education and education for sustainable development – Justification, model, practices and perspectives. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(1), 149–158.
- Engelbart, D. C. (1962). Augmenting human intellect: a conceptual framework. Summary Report for SRI Project No. 3578, Stanford Research Institute.
- Eren, M., Bulut, M., & Bulut, N. (2015). A content analysis study the usage of history of mathematics in textbooks in Turkey. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(1), 53–62. doi: 10.12973/eurasia.2015.1305a
- Esposito, A. (2012). Research ethics in emerging forms of online learning: issues arising from a hypothetical study on a MOOC. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 10(3), 315–325. Retrieved from http://www.ejel.org/issue/download.html?idArticle=210
- Fini, A. (2009). The technological dimension of a massive open online course: The Case of the CCK08 course tools. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(5), 1–26. Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/643/1410
- Fournier, H., Kop, R., & Sitlia, H. (2011). The value of learning analytics to networked learning on a personal learning environment. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, 104–109.
- Frank, S. J. (2012). Review: MITx’s online circuit and analysis course. Spectrum IEEE, 49(9), 27–28.
- Gao, F., Luo, T., & Zhang, K. (2012). Tweeting for learning: A critical analysis of research on microblogging in education published in 2008-2011. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(5), 783–801. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01357.x
- Han, S., Yalvac, B., Capraro, M. M., & Capraro, R. M. (2015). In-service teachers’ implementation and understanding of STEM project based learning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(1), 63–76. doi: 10.12973/eurasia.2015.1306a
- Hauser, J. R., & Clausing, D. (1988). The house of quality, The Harvard Business Review, 3, 63– 73.
- Hyman, P. (2012). In the year of disruptive education. Communications of the ACM, 55(12), 20–22. doi: 10.1145/2380656.2380664
- Jarrett, J. (2012), What Are 'MOOC's and Why Are Education Leaders Interested in Them? Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/impatient-optimists/what-are-moocsand-why-ar_b_2123399.html
- JISC (Joint Information Systems Committee), (2013), Open educational resources programme. Retrieved from http://www.jisc.ac.uk/whatwedo/programmes/elearning/oer.aspx
- Kelland, J. H. (2006). Constructivist theories and online learning best practices: A discourse analysis. Canadian Association for the Study of Adult Education (CASAE) 2006 National Conference On-Line Proceedings. York University, Toronto, Ontario.
- Kim, M. K., & Cho, M. K. (2015). Design and implementation of integrated instruction of mathematics and science in Korea. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(1), 3–15.
- Kirkwood, K. (2010). The wisdom of the clouds: Distributed learning, MOOCs, edupunks, and the challenge to formal education. In Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Open Source and Open Content (WOSOC) 2010, 96–103. Gunadarma University, Jakarta, Indonesia.
- Kohil, S., & Kumar, E. (2011). Evolution of user dependent model to predict future usability of a search engine. In Information and Communication Technologies (WICT), 2011 World Congress on Information and Communication Technologies. 285–290.
- Kop, R., & Carroll, F. (2012). Cloud computing and creativity: Learning on a massive open online course. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning. Retrieved from http://www.eurodl.org/index.php?article=457
- Kop, R., & Hill, A. (2008). Connectivism: Learning theory of the future or vestige of the past? International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 9(3). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/523/1103
- Kop, R., Fournier, H., & Mak, J. S. F. (2011). A pedagogy of abundance or a pedagogy to support human beings? Participant support on massive open online courses. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, Special Issue - Emergent Learning, Connections, Design for Learning, 12(7). Retrieved from http://nparc.cisti-icist.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/npsi/ctrl?action=rtdoc&an=19040607
- Koutropoulos, A., & Hogue, R. J. (2012). How to succeed in a MOOC-Massive online open course. eLearning Guild, October 08, 2012. Retrieved from http://www.cedmaeurope.org/newsletter%20articles/eLearning%20Guild/How%20to%20Succeed%20i n%20a%20MOOC%20- %20Massive%20Online%20Open%20Course%20(Oct%2012).pdf
- Koutropoulos, A., Gallagher, M. S., Abajian, S. C., deWaard, I., Hogue, R. J., Keskin, N. Ö., & Rodriguez, C. O. (2012). Emotive vocabulary in MOOCs: Context & participant retention. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning. Retrieved from http://www.eurodl.org/?p=Special&sp=init2&article=507
- Kukulska-Hulme, A., & Traxler, J. (2007). Designing for mobile and wireless learning. In H. Beetham & R. Sharpe (Eds.), Rethinking pedagogy for a digital age, 183–192. New York: Routledge.
- Lane, A., & McAndrew, P. (2010). Are open educational resources systematic or systemic change agents for teaching practice? British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(6), 952–962. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01119.x
- Laroche, L., Nicol, C., & Mayer-Smith, J. (2007). New venues for science teacher education: Self-organizational pedagogy on the edge of chaos. Complicity: An International Journal of Complexity and Education, 4(1), 69–83.
- Laurillard, D. (2007). Pedagogical forms for mobile learning. In N. Pachler (Ed.), Mobile learning: Towards a research agenda (pp. 153–175). London: WLE Centre, IoE.
- Levin, T. (2013). California bill seeks campus credit for online study. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/13/education/california-billwould-force-colleges-to-honor-online-classes.html?_r=1&
- Levy, D. (2011). Lessons learned from participating in a connectivist massive online open course (MOOC). Proceedings of the Chais conference on instructional technologies research 2011: Learning in the technological era. Eshet-Alkalai, Y., Caspi, A., Eden, S., Geri, N. & Yair, Y. (Eds.), The Open University of Israel, Raanana, 31–36. Retrieved from http://www.openu.ac.il/research_center/chais2011/download/f-levyd-94_eng.pdf
- Liyanagunawardena, T. R. (2012). Information communication technologies and distance education in Sri Lanka: A case study of two universities (PhD Thesis). University of Reading, Reading.
- Mackness, J., Mak, S. & Williams, R. (2010). The ideals and reality of participating in a MOOC. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Networked Learning 2010, 266–275. University of Lancaster, Lancaster.
- Mahraj, K. (2012). Using information expertise to enhance massive open online courses. Public Services Quarterly, 8(4), 359–368. doi: 10.1080/15228959.2012.730415
- Mak, S., Williams, R., & Mackness, J. (2010). Blogs and forums as communication and learning tools in a MOOC. In Networked Learning Conference, University of Lancaster, Lancaster, 275–285.
- Martin, F. G. (2012). Will massive open online courses change how we teach? Communications of the ACM, 55(8), doi: 26–28. 10.1145/2240236.2240246
- Masters, K. (2011). A brief guide to understanding MOOCs. The Internet Journal of Medical Education, 1(2). doi: 10.5580/1f21
- McAuley, A., Stewart, B., Siemens, G., & Cormier, D. (2010). The MOOC model for digital practice, SSHRC Knowledge Synthesis Grant on the Digital Economy. Retrieved from http://www.edukwest.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/MOOC_Final.pdf
- Mehaffy, G. L. (2012). Challenge and change. EDUCAUSE Review, September/October 2012, 25–41. Retrieved from http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ERM1252.pdf
- Mehlenbacher, B. (2012). Massive open online courses (MOOCs): Educational innovation or threat to higher education? Proceedings of the Workshop on Open Source and Design of Communication, 1–99. doi: 10.1145/2316936.2316953
- Meyer, R. (2012). What it’s like to teach a MOOC (and what the heck’s a MOOC?). Retrieved from http://tinyurl.com/cdfvvqy
- Opricovic, S., & Tzeng, G.H. (2003). Defuzzification within a multi-criteria decision model. International Journal of Uncertainty Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 11(5), 635–652. doi: 10.1142/S0218488503002387
- Özdamar Keskin, N., & Metcalf, D. (2011). The current perspectives, theories and practices of mobile learning. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(2), 202–208.
- Peters, M., (2008) Paper presented at Economic and Social Research Council (ERSC, UK) Seminar Series on “Education and the Knowledge Economy”, University of Bath.
- Ravenscroft, A. (2011). Dialogue and connectivism: A new approach to understanding and promoting dialogue-rich networked learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(3), 140–160. Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/934/1829
- Robbins, J. (2013). The ethics of MOOCs. Retrieved from http://www.insidehighered.com/blogs/sounding-board/ethics-moocs
- Roderick, S. (2008). Rethinking e-learning: A manifesto for connected generations. Distance Education, 29(2), 153–164. doi: 10.1080/01587910802154954
- Rodriguez, C. O. (2012). MOOCs and the AI-Stanford like courses: Two successful and distinct course formats for massive open online courses. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning. Retrieved from http://www.eurodl.org/?p=Special&sp=init2&article=516
- Sahin, Z., Yenmez, A. A., & Erbas, A. K. (2015). Relational understanding of the derivative concept through mathematical modeling: A case study. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(1), 177–188. doi: 10.12973/eurasia.2015.1149a
- Schrire, S., & Levy, D. (2012). Troubleshooting MOOCs: The case of a massive open online course at a college of education. In World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, 2012(1), 761–766.
- Shih, H. S., Lin, W. Y., & Lee, E. S. (2001). Group decision making for TOPSIS. In Joint 9th IFSA World Congress and 20th NAFIPS International Conference (pp. 2712–2717). IFSA/NAFIPS, Vancouver, Canada.
- Shih, H. S., Shyurb, H. J., & Lee, E. S. (2007). An extension of TOPSIS for Group Decision Making. Mathematical and Computer Modeling, 45, 801–813. doi: 10.1016/j.mcm.2006.03.023
- Shih, H.S. (2008). Incremental analysis for MCDM with an application to group TOPSIS. European Journal of Operational Research, 186, 720–734. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2007.02.012
- Shyura, H. J., & Shih, H. S. (2006). A hybrid MCDM model for strategic vendor selection. Mathematical and Computer Modeling, 44, 749–761. doi:10.1016/j.mcm.2005.04.018
- Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1), 3–10.
- Stewart, B. (2010). Social media literacies and perceptions of value in open online courses. Retrieved from http://portfolio.cribchronicles.com/wpcontent/uploads/2012/11/612701_Social_Media_Literacies_MOOCs.pdf
- Traxler, J. (2010). The learner experience of mobiles, mobility and connectedness. Paper published by ELESIG (Evaluation of Learners’ Experiences of e-Learning Special Interest Group). Retrieved from http://www.helenwhitehead.com/elesig /ELESIG%20Mobilities%20ReviewPDF.pdf
- Tschofen, C., & Mackness, J. (2012). Connectivism and dimensions of individual experience. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13(1), 124–143.
- Tsujimura, Y., Park, S. H., Chang, I. S., & Gen, M. (1993). An effective method for solving flow shop scheduling problems with fuzzy processing times. Computer and Industrial Engineering, 25, 239–242.
- Tsujumura, Y., Gen, M., & Kubota, E. (1993). Solving Fuzzy Assembly-Line Balancing Problem with Genetic Algorithms. Computer and Industrial Engineering, 29(1–4), 239–242. doi: 10.1016/0360-8352(93)90265-Y
- Vardi, M. Y. (2012). Will MOOCs destroy academia? Communications of the ACM, 55(11), 5. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2366317
- Vihavainen, A., Luukkainen, M., & Kurhila, J. (2012). Multi-faceted support for MOOC in programming. SIGITE’12, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, ACM. Retrieved from http://sigite2012.sigite.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/session13-paper02.pdf
- Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Interaction between learning and development. In L. S. Vygotsky (Ed.), Mind in society. 79–91, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Weller, M. (2007). Learning objects, learning design, and adoption through succession. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 19(1), 26–47.
- Wiley, D. A. (2003). A modest history of Open Courseware. Autounfocus blog. Retrieved from http://www.reusability.org/blogs/david/archives/000044.html
- Wiley, D. A. (2006). The Current State of Open Educational Resources. Retrieved from http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/247
- Wiley, D. A., & Hilton, J (2009). Openness, Dynamic Specialization, and the Disaggregated Future of Higher Education, Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/768/1414
- Wiley, D. A., Recker, M. M., & Gibbons, A. (2000). The reusability paradox. Retrieved from http://rclt.usu.edu/whitepapers/paradox.html
- Winters, N. (2007). What is mobile learning? In M. Sharples (Ed.), Big issues in mobile learning, 7–11. Nottingham, UK: LSRI, University of Nottingham.
- Yoon, K., & Hwang, C. L. (1985). Manufacturing plant location analysis by multiple attribute decision making: Part I-Single-Plant strategy. International Journal of Production Research, 23(2), 345–359. doi: 10.1080/00207548508904712
- Yuan, L., MacNeill, S., & Kraan, W. (2008). Open Educational Resources-Opportunities and challenges for higher education, from http://wiki.cetis.ac.uk/images/0/0b /OER_Briefing_Paper.pdf 1-34
- Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8, 338–353.
How to cite this article
APA
Hsieh, M.-Y. (2016). Online Learning Era: Exploring the Most Decisive Determinants of MOOCs in Taiwanese Higher Education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(5), 1163-1188. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1504a
Vancouver
Hsieh MY. Online Learning Era: Exploring the Most Decisive Determinants of MOOCs in Taiwanese Higher Education. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2016;12(5):1163-88. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1504a
AMA
Hsieh MY. Online Learning Era: Exploring the Most Decisive Determinants of MOOCs in Taiwanese Higher Education. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2016;12(5), 1163-1188. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1504a
Chicago
Hsieh, Ming-Yuan. "Online Learning Era: Exploring the Most Decisive Determinants of MOOCs in Taiwanese Higher Education". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2016 12 no. 5 (2016): 1163-1188. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1504a
Harvard
Hsieh, M.-Y. (2016). Online Learning Era: Exploring the Most Decisive Determinants of MOOCs in Taiwanese Higher Education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(5), pp. 1163-1188. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1504a
MLA
Hsieh, Ming-Yuan "Online Learning Era: Exploring the Most Decisive Determinants of MOOCs in Taiwanese Higher Education". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 12, no. 5, 2016, pp. 1163-1188. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1504a