Efficacy of Supplementary Image Schemes on Reading Motivation and Comprehension

Yu-Ming Chang; I-Chen Wang; Min-Yuan Ma

doi:10.12973/eurasia.2016.1503a

Full Text (PDF)

Yu-Ming Chang ¹, I-Chen Wang ² ^* , Min-Yuan Ma ²

More Detail

¹ Department of Multimedia and Entertainment Science, Southern Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Tainan, Taiwan² Department of Industrial Design, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan^* Corresponding Author

Abstract

This study examines the efficacy of three teaching methods, namely, passive supported image pedagogy, active supported image pedagogy, and traditional instruction, in increasing the reading motivation and comprehension of students. 116 fourth-grade students participated in the study and were evenly assigned, according to their pre-test performance, to one of three groups: “Passive Supported Group” (PSG), “Active Supported Group” (ASG), and “Text-only Group” (TOG). The PSG was asked to read a text with images; the ASG was asked to read the text and reconstruct the main ideas through image selection; and the TOG was asked merely to read the text. After eight weeks of reading-training, the three groups were asked to complete post-tests. Following this, independent-samples t-test and paired-samples t-test were used to analyze the results. Based on the results, active supported image pedagogy was found to be the most effective method for improving the reading motivation and comprehension of students.

Keywords

reading comprehension
reading motivation
passive supported image pedagogy
active supported image pedagogy

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Research Article

EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed, 2016, Volume 12, Issue 5, 1153-1162

https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1503a

Publication date: 20 Mar 2016

Article Views: 1686

Article Downloads: 1029

Open Access References How to cite this article

References

Ainsworth, S., Prain, V., & Tytler, R. (2011). Drawing to learn in science. Science, 333(6046), 1096–1097. doi: 10.1126/science.1204153
Alfassi, M. (2004). Reading to learn: Effects of combined strategy instruction on high school students. Journal of Education Research, 94(4), 171-184. doi: 10.3200/JOER.97.4.171- 185
Ametller, J., & Pintó, R. (2002). Stusents’ reading of innovative image of energy at secondary school level. International Journal of Science Education, 24(3), 285-312. doi: 10.1080/09500690110078914
Baker, L., & Wigfield, A. (1999). Dimensions of children’s motivation for reading and their relations to reading activity and reading achievement. Reading Research Quarterly, 34(4), 452-477. doi: 10.1598/RRQ.34.4.4
Becker, M., McElvany, N., & Kortenbruck, M. (2010). Intrinsic and extrinsic reading motivation as predictors of reading literacy: a longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(4), 773-785. doi: 10.1037/a0020084
Blankenship, T. L., Ayres, K. M., & Langone, J. (2005). Effects of computer-based cognitive mapping on reading comprehension for students with emotional behavior disorders. Journal of Special Education Technology, 20(2), 15-23.
Block, C., Parris, S., Read, K., Whiteley, C., & Cleveland, M. (2009). Instructional approaches that significantly increase reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(2), 262-281. doi: 10.1037/a0014319
Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
Carney, R. N., & Levin, J. R. (2002). Pictorial illustrations still improve students' learning from text. Educational Psychology Review, 14(1), 5-26. doi: 10.1023/A:1013176309260
Chall, J. S. (1995). Literacy development. Journal of Education, 177(1), 63-83.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Self-determination theory: a macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology, 49(3), 182-185. doi: 10.1037/a0012801
Fehr, C. N., Davison, M. L., Graves, M. F., Sales, G. C., Seipel, B., & Sekhran-Sharma, S. (2012). The effects of individualized, online vocabulary instruction on picture vocabulary scores: an efficacy study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 25(1), 87-102. doi: 10.1080/09588221.2011.586640
Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., Barbosa, P., Perencevich, K. C., Taboada, A., & Davis, M. H. (2004). Increasing reading comprehension and engagement through concept-orientated reading instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(3), 403−423. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.96.3.403
Karapantsios, T.D., Boutskou, E.I., Touliopoulou, E., & Mavros, P. (2008). Evaluation of chemical laboratory safety based on student comprehension of chemicals labeling. Education for Chemical Engineers, 3(1), 66-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ece.2008.02.001
Kirby, J. R., Ball, A., Geier, B. K., Rauno, P., & Wade-Wooley, L. (2011). The development of reading interest and its relation to reading ability. Journal of Research in Reading, 34(3), 263-280. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9817.2010.01439.x
Leopold, C., & Leutner, D. (2012). Science text comprehension: Drawing, main idea selection, and summarization as learning strategies. Learning and Instruction, 22(1), 16–26. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.05.005
Lin, P.-K., & Chi, P.-H. (2000). The development of test of reading comprehension. Ulletin of Special Education, 19(5), 79-104.
Mason, L., Tornatora, M. C., & Pluchino, P. (2013). Do fourth graders integrate text and picture in processing and learning from an illustrated science text? Evidence from eye movement patterns. Computers & Education, 60, 95-109. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.07.011
McCrudden, M. T., Magliano, J. P., & Schraw, G. (2011). The effect of diagrams on online reading processes and memory. Discourse Processes, 48, 69–92. doi: 10.1080/01638531003694561
Mullis, I.V.S., Kennedy, A.M., Martin, M.O., & Sainsbury, M. (2006). PIRLS 2006: Assessment Framework and Specifications (2nd ed.). Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College, TIMSS and PIRLS, International Study Center, Lynch School of Education.
Norman R. R. (2012). Reading the graphics: what is the relationship between graphical reading processes and student comprehension? Reading and Writing, 23(3), 739-774. doi: 10.1007/s11145-011-9298-7
Otis, N., Grouzet, M. E., & Pelletier, L. G. (2005). Latent motivational change in an academic setting: A 3-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(2), 170-183. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.97.2.170
Paivio, A. (1991). Dual-coding theory: Retrospect and current status. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 45(3), 255-287. doi: 10.1037/h0084295
Pike, M. M., Barnes, M. A., & Barron R. W. (2010). The role of illustrations in children’s inferential comprehension. Journal of Experimental Children Psychology, 105, 243-255. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2009.10.006.
Rapp, D. N., van den Broek, p., McMASTER, K. L., Kendeou, P., & Espin, C. A. (2007). Higherorder comprehension processes in struggling readers: A perspective for research and intervention. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11(4), 289-312. doi:10.1080/10888430701530417
Ratelle, C. F., Guay, F., Vallerand, R. J., Larose, S., & Senécal, C. (2007). Autonomous, controlled, and amotivated types of academic motivation: A person-oriented analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(4), 734-746. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.99.4.734
Risko, V. J., Walker-Dalhouse, D., Bridges, E. S., & Wilson, A. (2011). Drawing on Text Features for Reading Comprehension and Composing. The Reading Teacher, 64(5), 376-378. doi: 10.1598/RT.64.5.12
Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360-407. doi: 10.1598/RRQ.21.4.1
Tare, M., Chiong, C., Ganea, P., & DeLoache, J. (2010). Less is more: How manipulative features affect children’s learning from picture. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 31(5), 395-400. doi: 10.1016/j.appdev.2010.06.005
Wang, J., & Guthrie, J. T. (2004). Modeling the effects of intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, amount of reading, and past reading achievement on text comprehension between U.S. and Chinese students. Reading Research Quarterly, 39(2), 162−186. doi: 10.1598/RRQ.39.2.2
Yu, X. (2012). Exploring visual perception and children's interpretations of picture books. Library & Information Science Research, 34, 292-299. doi: 10.1016/j.lisr.2012.06.004

How to cite this article

APA

Chang, Y.-M., Wang, I.-C., & Ma, M.-Y. (2016). Efficacy of Supplementary Image Schemes on Reading Motivation and Comprehension. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(5), 1153-1162. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1503a

Vancouver

Chang YM, Wang IC, Ma MY. Efficacy of Supplementary Image Schemes on Reading Motivation and Comprehension. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2016;12(5):1153-62. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1503a

AMA

Chang YM, Wang IC, Ma MY. Efficacy of Supplementary Image Schemes on Reading Motivation and Comprehension. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2016;12(5), 1153-1162. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1503a

Chicago

Chang, Yu-Ming, I-Chen Wang, and Min-Yuan Ma. "Efficacy of Supplementary Image Schemes on Reading Motivation and Comprehension". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2016 12 no. 5 (2016): 1153-1162. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1503a

Harvard

Chang, Y.-M., Wang, I.-C., and Ma, M.-Y. (2016). Efficacy of Supplementary Image Schemes on Reading Motivation and Comprehension. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(5), pp. 1153-1162. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1503a

MLA

Chang, Yu-Ming et al. "Efficacy of Supplementary Image Schemes on Reading Motivation and Comprehension". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 12, no. 5, 2016, pp. 1153-1162. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1503a