Pre-service teachers’ perceptions about the contributions of field work and construction of a physical model to modelling aquifers

Araitz Uskola; Nahia Seijas

doi:10.29333/ejmste/14357

Full Text (PDF)

Araitz Uskola ¹ ^* , Nahia Seijas ²

More Detail

¹ Facultad de Educación de Bilbao, University of the Basque Country, Leioa, SPAIN² IES Zabalgana BHI, Vitoria-Gasteiz, SPAIN^* Corresponding Author

Abstract

Teachers are crucial to implement innovative activities in the classroom and to make them effective for their students’ learning. Teachers’ beliefs have been found to condition the extent to which and the way in which they carry out certain activities. This study analyses the beliefs of 73 pre-service teachers (two cohorts) about two resources (fieldwork and physical model) used in an aquifer modelling sequence in which they had participated. Their perceptions are compared with the hypothetical purposes of the resources in a modelling process. The data analyzed were the written reflections at the end of the activities. Both resources were rated very positively. Practically all participants referred to contributions to learning and many made metacognitive reflections. The results show that both resources met the expectations about their contribution to modelling. The implications for future design of modelling activities are discussed.

Keywords

field trip
modelling
perceptions
physical model
pre-service teachers

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Research Article

EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed, 2024, Volume 20, Issue 4, Article No: em2420

https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14357

Publication date: 01 Apr 2024

Online publication date: 14 Mar 2024

Article Views: 460

Article Downloads: 330

Open Access References How to cite this article

References

Adúriz-Bravo, A., Gómez, A., Márquez, C., & Sanmartí, N. (2005). La mediación analógica en la ciencia escolar. Propuesta de la “función modelo teórico” [Analogical mediation in school science. Proposal of the “theoretical model function”]. Enseñanza de las Ciencias [Science Teaching].
Aguilera D. (2018). La salida de campo como recurso didáctico para enseñar ciencias. Una revisión sistemática [Field trip as a didactic resource to teach sciences. A systematic review]. Revista Eureka Sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias [Eureka Magazine on Science Teaching and Dissemination], 15(3), 3103/1-3103/17. https://doi.org/10.25267/Rev_Eureka_ensen_divulg_cienc.2018.v15.i3.3103
Almquist, H., Stanley, G., Blank, L., Hendrix, M., Rosenblatt, M., Hanfling, S., & Crews, J. (2011). An integrated field-based approach to building teachers’ geoscience skills. Journal of Geoscience Education, 59(1), 31-40. https://doi.org/10.5408/1.3543926
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Pearson.
Areljung, S., Due, K., Ottander, C., Skoog, M., & Sundberg, B. (2021). Why and how teachers make use of drawing activities in early childhood science education. International Journal of Science Education, 43(13), 2127-2147. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1953186
Bahamonde, N., & Gómez Galindo, A. A. (2016). Caracterización de modelos de digestión humana a partir de sus representaciones y análisis de su evolución en un grupo de docentes y auxiliares académicos [Characterization of human digestion models from its representations and analysis of its progress in a group of teachers and supporting academic team]. Enseñanza de las Ciencias [Science Teaching], 34(1), 129-147. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/ensciencias.1748
Behrendt, M., & Franklin, T. (2014). A review of research on school field trips and their value in education. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 9(3), 235-245. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijese.2014.213a
Bulterman-Bos, J. (2008). Will a clinical approach make education research more relevant for practice? Educational Researcher, 37(7), 412-420. https://doi.org/10.3102/2F0013189X08325555
Carrier, S. J. (2009). The effects of outdoor science lessons with elementary school students on preservice teachers’ self-efficacy. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21(2), 35-48. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173683
Carrier, S. J., Tugurian, L. P., & Thomson, M. M. (2013). Elementary science indoors and out: Teachers, time, and testing. Research in Science Education, 43, 2059-2083. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-012-9347-5
Dickerson, D. L., Penick, J. E., Dawkins, K. R., & Van Sickle, M. (2007). Groundwater in science education. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18(1), 45-61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-006-9019-2
Donaldson, T., Fore, G. A., Filippelli, G. M., & Hess, J. L. (2020). A systematic review of the literature on situated learning in the geosciences: Beyond the classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 42(5), 722-743. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1727060
Egger, A. (2019). The field as touchstone. Journal of Geoscience Education, 67(2), 97-99. https://doi.org/10.1080/10899995.2019.1596461
Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp 119-161). Macmillan.
Fang, Z. (1996). A review of research on teacher beliefs and practices. Educational Research, 38(1), 47-65. https://doi.org/10.1080/0013188960380104
Fedesco, H., Cavin, D., & Henares, R. (2020). Field-based learning in higher education. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 20(1), 65-84. https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v20i1.24877
Forbes, C. T., Zangori, L., & Schwarz, C. V. (2015). Empirical validation of integrated learning performances for hydrologic phenomena: 3rd-grade students’ model-driven explanation-construction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(7), 895-921. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21226
García, B., & Mateos, A. (2018). Comparación entre la realización de maquetas y la visualización para mejorar la alfabetización visual en anatomía humana en futuros docentes [Comparison between the creation of models and visualization to enhance visual literacy in human anatomy in preservice teachers]. Revista Eureka Sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias [Eureka Magazine on Science Teaching and Dissemination], 15(3), 3605. https://doi.org/10.25267/Rev_Eureka_ensen_divulg_cienc.2018.v15.i3.3605
Gilbert, J. K. (2005). Visualization: A metacognitive skill in science and science education. In J. K. Gilbert (Ed.), Visualization in science education. Models and modeling in science education (pp. 9-27). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3613-2_2
Gilbert, J. K., & Justi, R. (2016). Modelling-based teaching in science education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29039-3
Gilbert, J. K., Boulter, C. J., & Elmer, R. (2000). Positioning models in science education and in design and technology education. In J. K. Gilbert, & C. J. Boulter (Eds.), Developing models in science education (pp. 3-17). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0876-1_1
Gómez, A. A., Sanmartí, N., & Pujol, R. M. (2007). Fundamentación teórica y diseño de una unidad didáctica para la enseñanza del modelo ser vivo en la escuela primaria [Theoretical foundations and design of a teaching unit to teach the model of living being in primary school]. Enseñanza de las Ciencias [Science Teaching], 25(3), 325-340. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/ensciencias.3699
Granit-Dgani, D., Kaplan, A., & Flum, H. (2017). Theory-based assessment in environmental education: A tool for formative evaluation. Environmental Education Research, 23(2), 269-299. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/13504622.2016.1144172
Gray, K. R., Owens, K. D., Steer, D. N., McConnell, D. A., & Knight, C. C. (2011). An exploratory study using hands-on physical models in a large introductory Earth science classroom: Student attitudes and lessons learned. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 12(2), 1-23.
Guy-Gaytán, C., Gouvea, J. S., Griesemer, C., & Passmore, C. (2019). Tensions between learning models and engaging in modeling: Exploring implications for science classrooms. Science & Education, 28(1), 843-864. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-019-00064-y
Hatton, N., & Smith, D. (1995). Reflection in teacher education: Towards definitions and implementation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11, 33-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/0742-051X(94)00012-U
Jiménez-Tenorio, N., Aragón Núñez, L., & Oliva Martínez, J. M. (2016). Percepciones de estudiantes para maestros de educación primaria sobre los modelos analógicos como recurso didáctico [Perceptions of students for future primary school teachers about analog models as a didactic resource]. Enseñanza de las Ciencias [Science Teaching], 34(3), 91-112. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/ensciencias.1943
Kastens, K. A., & Rivet, A. (2010). Using analogical mapping to assess the affordances of scale models used in Earth and environmental science education. In C. Hölscher (Ed.), Spatial cognition VII (pp. 112-124). Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14749-4_12
Maia, P. F., & Justi, R. (2009). Learning of chemical equilibrium through modelling based teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 31(5), 603-630. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802538045
Maiorca, C., Martin, J., Burton, M., Roberts, T., & Tripp, L. O. (2023). Model-eliciting activities: Pre-service teachers’ perceptions of integrated STEM. Education Sciences, 13(12), 1247. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13121247
Mena-Marcos, J., García-Rodriguez, M.-L., & Tillema, H. (2012). Student teacher reflective writing: What does it reveal? European Journal of Teacher Education, 36(2), 147-163. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2012.713933
Miller, A. R., & Kastens, K. A. (2018). Investigating the impacts of targeted professional development around models and modeling on teachers’ instructional practice and student learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(5), 641-663. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21434
Mogk, D. W., & Goodwin, C. (2012). Learning in the field: Synthesis of research on thinking and learning in the geosciences. In K. A. Kastens, & C. A. Manduca (Eds.), Earth and mind II: A synthesis of research on thinking and learning in the geosciences (pp. 131-163). Geological Society of America. https://doi.org/10.1130/2012.2486(24)
Ng, C., Graham, S., Renshaw, P., Cheung, A., & Mak, B. (2024). Australian grades 4 to 6 teachers’ beliefs and practices about teaching writing to low SES students. International Journal of Educational Research, 124, 102304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2023.102304
NRC. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. National Academies Press.
Nugent, G., Toland, M. D., Levy, R., Kunz, G., Harwood, D., Green, D., & Kitts, K. (2012). The impact of an inquiry-based geoscience field course on pre-service teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23, 503-529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-012-9283-2
Oh, P. S., & Oh, S. J. (2011). What teachers of science need to know about models: An overview. International Journal of Science Education, 33(8), 1109-1130. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.502191
Orion, N., & Hofstein, A. (1991). The measurement of students’ attitudes towards scientific field trips. Science Education, 75(5), 513-523. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730750503
Osborne, J. (2014). Teaching scientific practices: Meeting the challenge of change. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(2), 177-196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-014-9384-1
Prain, V. (2019). Future research in learning with, through and from scientific representations. In V. Prain, & B. Hand (Eds.), Theorizing the future of science education research (pp. 151-168). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24013-4_10
Prain, V., & Tytler, R. (2012). Learning through constructing representations in science: A framework of representational construction affordances. International Journal of Science Education, 34(17), 2751-2773. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.626462
Sáez-Bondía, M. J., & Cortés-Gracia, A. L. (2019). ¿Cómo cambian las ideas de los estudiantes de máster de profesorado sobre una actividad práctica de campo tras su vídeo-análisis y discusión en pequeños grupos? [How do change pre-service teachers’ ideas about a fieldwork activity after its video-analysis and discussion in small groups?] Revista Eureka Sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias [Eureka Magazine on Science Teaching and Dissemination], 16(2), 2602. https://doi.org/10.25267/Rev_Eureka_ensen_divulg_cienc.2019.v16.i2.2602
Schwarz, C. V., Reiser, B. J., Davis, E. A., Kenyon, L., Achér, A., Fortus, D., & Krajcik, J. (2009). Developing a learning progression for scientific modeling: Making scientific modeling accessible and meaningful for learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(6), 632-654. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20311
Seijas, N., & Uskola, A. (2022). Revision and manipulation of physical models as tools for developing the aquifer model by Preservice Elementary Teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 44(11), 1715-1737. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2022.2095453
Sensevy, G., Tiberghien, A., Santini, J., Laubé, S., & Griggs, P. (2008). An epistemological approach to modeling: Cases studies and implications for science teaching. Science Education, 92(3), 424-446. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20268
Steer, D. N., Knight, C. C., Owens, K. D., & McConnell, D. A. (2005). Challenging students ideas about earth’s interior structure using a model-based, conceptual change approach in a large class setting. Journal of Geoscience Education, 53(4), 415-421. https://doi.org/10.5408/1089-9995-53.4.415
Torres, J., & Vasconcelos, C. (2016). Models in geoscience classes: How can teachers use them? In C. Vasconcelos (Ed.), Geoscience education (pp. 25-41). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43319-6_2
Uskola, A., & Seijas, N. (2023). Use of data obtained in the field and its contribution to the process of construction of the geological change model by Preservice Elementary Teachers. Research in Science and Technological Education, 41(4), 1330-1349. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2021.2005561
Uskola, A., Zamalloa, T., & Achurra, A. (2022). Using multiple strategies in deepening the understanding of the digestive system. Journal of Biological Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2022.2064896
Vartuli, S. (2005). Beliefs: The heart of teaching. Young Children, 60(5), 76-86.
Vo, T., Forbes, C., Zangori, L., & Schwarz, C. V. (2019). Longitudinal investigation of primary in-service teachers’ modelling the hydrological phenomena. International Journal of Science Education, 41(18), 2788-2807. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1698786
Windschitl, M. (2003). Inquiry projects in science teacher education: What can investigative experiences reveal about teacher thinking and eventual classroom practice? Science Education, 87(1), 112-143. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10044
Yang, J., Ozbek, G., & Cho, S. (2023). Teachers’ beliefs and their influence on math instructions for gifted English learners. Education Sciences, 13(7), 728. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070728
Zembal-Saul, C. (2009). Learning to teach elementary school science as argument. Science Education, 93(4), 687-719. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20325

How to cite this article

APA

Uskola, A., & Seijas, N. (2024). Pre-service teachers’ perceptions about the contributions of field work and construction of a physical model to modelling aquifers. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(4), em2420. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14357

Vancouver

Uskola A, Seijas N. Pre-service teachers’ perceptions about the contributions of field work and construction of a physical model to modelling aquifers. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2024;20(4):em2420. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14357

AMA

Uskola A, Seijas N. Pre-service teachers’ perceptions about the contributions of field work and construction of a physical model to modelling aquifers. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2024;20(4), em2420. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14357

Chicago

Uskola, Araitz, and Nahia Seijas. "Pre-service teachers’ perceptions about the contributions of field work and construction of a physical model to modelling aquifers". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2024 20 no. 4 (2024): em2420. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14357

Harvard

Uskola, A., and Seijas, N. (2024). Pre-service teachers’ perceptions about the contributions of field work and construction of a physical model to modelling aquifers. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(4), em2420. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14357

MLA

Uskola, Araitz et al. "Pre-service teachers’ perceptions about the contributions of field work and construction of a physical model to modelling aquifers". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 20, no. 4, 2024, em2420. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14357