Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

• Amit, M., & Vinner, S. (1990). Some misconceptions in calculus–Anecdotes or the tip of an iceberg? In Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 3-10).
• Ayebo, A., Ukkelberg, S., & Assuah, C. (2017). Success in introductory calculus: The role of high school and pre-calculus preparation. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 3(1), 11-19. https://doi.org/10.21890/ijres.267359
• Ball, D. L. (1990). The mathematical understandings that prospective teachers bring to teacher education. The Elementary School Journal, 90(4), 449-466. https://doi.org/10.1086/461626
• Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389-407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108324554
• Bezuidenhout, J. (1998). First-year university students’ understanding of rate of change. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 29(3), 389-399. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739980290309
• Brijlall, D., & Ndlovu, Z. (2013). High school learners’ mental construction during solving optimization problems in calculus: A South African case study. South African Journal of Education, 33(2), 2-18. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v33n2a679
• Byerley, C. (2019). Calculus students’ fraction and measure schemes and implications for teaching rate of change functions conceptually. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 55, 100694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2019.03.001
• Byerley, C., & Thompson, P. W. (2014). Secondary teachers’ relative size schemes. In Proceedings of the 38^th Meeting of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 217-224).
• Byerley, C., & Thompson, P. W. (2017). Secondary mathematics teachers’ meanings for measure, slope, and rate of change. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 48, 168-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2017.09.003
• Carlson, M. P., Madison, B., & West, R. D. (2015). A study of students’ readiness to learn calculus. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 1(2), 209-233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-015-0013-y
• Cetin, N. (2009). The ability of students to comprehend the function-derivative relationship with regard to problems from their real life. Primus, 19(3), 232-244. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970701686987
• Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. SAGE.
• Dane, A., Cetin, O. F., Bas, F., & Ozturan Sagirli, M. (2016). A conceptual and procedural research on the hierarchical structure of mathematics emerging in the minds of university students: An example of limit-continuity-integral-derivative. International Journal of Higher Education, 5(2), 82-91. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v5n2p82
• Desfitri, R. (2016). In-service teachers’ understanding on the concept of limits and derivatives and the way they deliver the concepts to their high school students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 693, 012016. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/693/1/012016
• Estonanto, A. J. J., & Dio, R. V. (2019). Factors causing mathematics anxiety of senior high school students in calculus. Asian Journal of Education and E-Learning, 7(1), 37-47. https://doi.org/10.24203/ajeel.v7i1.5701
• Fothergill, L. (2011). Aspects of calculus for pre-service teachers. Mathematics Educator, 21(1), 23-31.
• Fuadah, U. S., Sukma, Y., & Yanda, F. (2022). Book review: A review of the book by Liping Ma (2020), Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics: Teachers’ understanding of fundamental mathematics in China and the United States. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 110(2), 379-391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10116-2
• Goldin, G. A. (2000). A scientific perspective on structured, task-based interviews in mathematics education research. In A. E. Kelly, & R. A. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Gudmundsdottir, S., & Shulman, L. (1987). Pedagogical content knowledge in social studies. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 31(2), 59-70. https://doi.org/10.1080/0031383870310201
• Hashemi, N., Abu, M. S., Kashefi, H., & Rahimi, K. (2014). Undergraduate students’ difficulties in conceptual understanding of derivation. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 143, 358-366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.495
• Herbert, S., & Pierce, R. (2012). Revealing educationally critical aspects of rate. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 81(1), 85-101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-011-9368-4
• Jones, S. R. (2017). An exploratory study on student understandings of derivatives in real-world, non-kinematics contexts. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 45, 95-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2016.11.002
• Kertil, M. (2014). Pre-service elementary mathematics teachers’ understanding of derivative through a model development unit [Doctoral dissertation, Middle East Technical University].
• Kertil, M. (2021). Conceptual analysis of derivative as a rate of change and analysis of the mathematics textbooks. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 11, 545-568. https://doi.org/10.19126/suje.977200
• Kertil, M., & Dede, H. G. (2022). Promoting prospective mathematics teachers’ understanding of derivative across different real-life contexts. International Journal for Mathematics Teaching and Learning, 23(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.4256/ijmtl.v23i1.361
• Lam, T. T. (2009). On in-service mathematics teachers’ content knowledge of calculus and related concepts. The Mathematics Educator, 12(1), 69-86.
• Leong, K. E., Meng, C. C., & Abdul Rahim, S. S. (2015). Understanding Malaysian pre-service teachers mathematical content knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(2), 363-370. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1346a
• Li, V. L., Julaihi, N. H., & Eng, T. H. (2017). Misconceptions and errors in learning integral calculus. Asian Journal of University Education, 13(2), 17-39.
• Maher, C. A., & Sigley, R. (2014). Task-based interviews in mathematics education. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mathematics education (pp. 580-582). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4978-8
• Makonye, J. P., & Luneta, K. (2014). Mathematical errors in differential calculus tasks in the senior school certificate examinations in South Africa. Education as Change, 18(1), 119-136. https://doi.org/10.1080/16823206.2013.847014
• Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. Jossey-Bass Publishers.
• Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. Jossey-Bass.
• Meylani, R., & Teuscher, D. (2011). Calculus readiness: Comparing student outcomes from traditional precalculus and AP calculus AB with a novel precalculus program. In Proceedings of the 33^rd Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education.
• Mkhatshwa, T. P. (2019). Calculus students’ quantitative reasoning in the context of solving related rates of change problems. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 22(2), 139-161. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2019.1658055
• Mkhatshwa, T. P., & Doerr, H. M. (2018). Undergraduate students’ quantitative reasoning in economic contexts undergraduate students’ quantitative reasoning in economic. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 20(2), 142-161. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2018.1442642
• Nagle, C., & Moore-Russo, D. (2013). The concept of slope: Comparing teachers’ concept images and instructional content. Investigations in Mathematics Learning, 6(2), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/24727466.2013.11790330
• Nagle, C., Martínez-Planell, R., & Moore-Russo, D. (2019). Using APOS theory as a framework for considering slope understanding. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 54, 100684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2018.12.003
• Nasir, N. M., Hashim, Y., Zabidi, S. F. H. A., Awang, R. J., & Zaihidee, E. M. (2013). Preliminary study of student performance on algebraic concepts and differentiation. World Applied Sciences Journal, 21, 162-167.
• Orton, A. (1983). Students’ understanding of differentiation. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 14(3), 235-250. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00410540
• Orton, A. (1984). Understanding rate of change. Mathematics in School, 13(5), 23-26.
• Piaget, J. (1929). The child’s conception of the world. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.
• Pitt, D. G. (2015). On the scaling of NSW HSC marks in mathematics and encouraging higher participation in calculus-based courses. Australian Journal of Education, 59(1), 65-81. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004944115571943
• Shamsuddin, M., Mahlan, S. B., Umar, N., & Alias, F. A. (2015). Mathematical errors in advanced calculus: A survey among engineering students. Esteem Academic Journal, 11(2), 37-44.
• Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004
• Stump, S. (1999). Secondary mathematics teachers’ knowledge of slope. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 11, 124-144. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217065
• Stump, S. L. (2001). Developing pre-service teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge of slope. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 20(2), 207-227. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-3123(01)00071-2
• Tall, D. (1993). Students’ difficulties in calculus. In Proceedings of Working Group 3 on Students’ Difficulties in Calculus (pp. 13-28).
• Tall, D. (2009). Dynamic mathematics and the blending of knowledge structures in the calculus. ZDM-International Journal on Mathematics Education, 41(4), 481-492. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-009-0192-6
• Tall, D. (2019). The evolution of calculus: A personal experience 1956-2019 [Opening plenary]. The Conference on Calculus in Upper Secondary and Beginning University Mathematics.
• Teuscher, D., & Reys, R. E. (2012). Rate of change: AP Calculus students’ understandings and misconceptions after completing different curricular paths. School Science and Mathematics, 112(6), 359-376. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2012.00150.x
• Thompson, P. W. (2008). Conceptual analysis of mathematical ideas: Some spadework at the foundation of mathematics education. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 31-49).
• Thompson, P. W., & Thompson, A. G. (1992). Images of rate. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association.
• Tyne, J. G. (2016). Calculus students’ reasoning about slope and derivative as rates of change [Master’s thesis, University of North Carolina].
• Ubuz, B. (2007). Interpreting a graph and constructing its derivative graph: Stability and change in students’ conceptions. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 38(5), 609-637. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207390701359313
• Verzosa, D. (2015). Reading the world with calculus. Primus, 25(4), 349-368. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2014.978983
• Weber, E., & Dorko, A. (2014). Students’ and experts’ schemes for rate of change and its representations. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 34, 14-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2014.01.002
• Weber, E., & Thompson, P. W. (2014). Students’ images of two-variable functions and their graphs. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 87, 67-85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-014-9548-0
• Weber, E., Tallman, M., Byerley, C., & Thompson, P. W. (2012). Introducing the derivative via calculus triangles. Mathematics Teacher, 104(4), 274-278. https://doi.org/10.5951/mathteacher.106.4.0274
• Zandieh, M. (2000). A theoretical framework for analyzing student understanding of the concept of derivative. CBMS Issues in Mathematics Education, 8, 103-127. https://doi.org/10.1090/cbmath/008/06

APA

Talib, N. A., Abdul Rahim, S. S., & Zulnaidi, H. (2023). Slope conception as rate of change starter kit: Malaysian pre-service secondary mathematics teachers’ subject matter knowledge in rate of change. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(12), em2368. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13862

Vancouver

Talib NA, Abdul Rahim SS, Zulnaidi H. Slope conception as rate of change starter kit: Malaysian pre-service secondary mathematics teachers’ subject matter knowledge in rate of change. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2023;19(12):em2368. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13862

AMA

Talib NA, Abdul Rahim SS, Zulnaidi H. Slope conception as rate of change starter kit: Malaysian pre-service secondary mathematics teachers’ subject matter knowledge in rate of change. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2023;19(12), em2368. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13862

Chicago

Talib, Nurul Atiqah, Suzieleez Syrene Abdul Rahim, and Hutkemri Zulnaidi. "Slope conception as rate of change starter kit: Malaysian pre-service secondary mathematics teachers’ subject matter knowledge in rate of change". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2023 19 no. 12 (2023): em2368. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13862

Harvard

Talib, N. A., Abdul Rahim, S. S., and Zulnaidi, H. (2023). Slope conception as rate of change starter kit: Malaysian pre-service secondary mathematics teachers’ subject matter knowledge in rate of change. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(12), em2368. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13862

MLA

Talib, Nurul Atiqah et al. "Slope conception as rate of change starter kit: Malaysian pre-service secondary mathematics teachers’ subject matter knowledge in rate of change". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 19, no. 12, 2023, em2368. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13862