The Relative Efficiencies of Research Universities of Science and Technology in China: Based on the Data Envelopment Analysis and Stochastic Frontier Analysis

Wang Chuanyi; Lv Xiaohong; Zhao Shikui

doi:10.12973/eurasia.2016.02302a

Full Text (PDF)

Wang Chuanyi ¹, Lv Xiaohong ¹, Zhao Shikui ² ^*

More Detail

¹ Wuhan University, CHINA² Beihang University, CHINA^* Corresponding Author

Abstract

This paper applies data envelopment analysis (DEA) and stochastic frontier analysis (SFA) to explore the relative efficiency of China’s research universities of science and technology. According to the finding, when talent training is the only output, the efficiency of research universities of science and technology is far lower than that of comprehensive universities. However, when the outputs of scientific research and social service are taken into consideration, the former will increase remarkably and even exceeds the latter. Moreover, the research universities of science and technology have a higher inner homogeneity because their standard deviation of efficiency score is obviously lower. The study also reveals that the number of research universities of science and technology with redundant inputs is more than that of comprehensive universities. Beyond that, the environmental variables and statistical noise exert no significant effect on the efficiency of Chinese research universities.

Keywords

efficiency
DEA
research universities of science and technology

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Research Article

EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed, 2016, Volume 12, Issue 10, 2753-2770

https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.02302a

Publication date: 17 Dec 2016

Article Views: 2082

Article Downloads: 1340

Open Access References How to cite this article

References

Abbott, M., & Doucouliagos, C. (2003). The efficiency of Australian universities: a data envelopment analysis. Economics of Education Review, 22(1), 89-97.
Amirteimoori, A., Emrouznejad, A., & Khoshandam, L. (2013). Classifying flexible measures in data envelopment analysis: a slack-based measure. Measurement, 46(10), 4100-4107.
Aristovnik, A., & Obadic, A. (2014). The funding and efficiency of higher education in Croatia and Slovenia: a non-parametric comparison. William Davidson Institute Working Papers, 2011(30), 362-376.
Avkiran, N. K. (2001). Investigating technical and scale efficiencies of Australian universities through data envelopment analysis. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 35(1), 57-80.
Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30(9), 1078- 1092.
Bayraktar, E., Tatoglu, E., & Zaim, S. (2013). Measuring the relative efficiency of quality management practices in turkish public and private universities. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 64(12).
Berbegal Mirabent, J., & Solé Parellada, F. (2012). What are we measuring when evaluating universities’ efficiency? Regional & Sectoral Economic Studies, 12(3).
Burney, N. A., & Johnes, J. (2013). The efficiency of public schools: the case of Kuwait. Education Economics, 21(4), 360-379.
Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429-444.
Chu, N. Y., Li, S. K., & Shu-Ki, T. (2000). The incidence of surplus labor in rural china: a nonparametric estimation. Journal of Comparative Economics, 28(3), 565-580.
Cook, W. D., Tone, K., & Zhu, J. (2014). Data envelopment analysis: prior to choosing a model. Omega, 44(2), 1-4
Gökşen, Y., Doğan, O., & Özkarabacak, B. (2015). A data envelopment analysis application for measuring efficiency of university departments. Procedia Economics & Finance, 19, 226-237.
Haelermans, C., & Witte, K. D. (2012). The role of innovations in secondary school performance – evidence from a conditional efficiency model. European Journal of Operational Research, 223(2), 541-549.
Halkos, G. E., Tzeremes, N. G., & Kourtzidis, S. A. (2012). Measuring public owned university departments' efficiency: a bootstrapped DEA approach. Journal of Economics & Econometrics, 55(2), 1-24.
Hathroubi, S., Peypoch, N., & Robinot, E. (2014). Technical efficiency and environmental management: The Tunisian case. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Management, 21(21), 27–33.
Johnes, J. (2006). DEA and its application to the measurement of efficiency in higher education. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 25(3), 273-288.
Johnes, J. (2015). Operational research in education. European Journal of Operational Research, 243(3), 683-696.
Johnes, J., & Taylor, J. (1990). Performance indicators in higher education: UK universities. Book/report/proceedings(100). Research, 130(3), 498-509.
Köksal, G., & Nalçaci, B. (2006). The relative efficiency of departments at a Turkish engineering college: A data envelopment analysis. Higher Education,51(2), 173-189.
Kuah, C. T., & Wong, K. Y. (2011). Efficiency assessment of universities through data envelopment analysis. Procedia Computer Science, 3(1), 499-506.
Luo, Hang & Guo, Zhen (2014). "985 Project" universities efficiency evaluation of 2012----the teaching & research efficiency research and structure & environment contributing factor analysis based on the DEA-Tobit model. Journal of Higher Education, 12, 35-45.
Lee, B. L., & Worthington, A. C. (2015). A network DEA quantity and quality-orientated production model: an application to Australian university research services. Omega, 60, 26-33.
Liu, J. S., Lu, L. Y. Y., Lu, W. M., & Lin, B. J. Y. (2013). A survey of DEA applications. Omega, 41(5), 893-902.
Mikušová, P. (2015). An application of DEA methodology in efficiency measurement of the Czech public universities. Procedia Economics & Finance, 25, 569-578.
Nazarko, J., & Šaparauskas, J. (2014). Application of DEA method in efficiency evaluation of public higher education institutions. Technological & Economic Development of Economy, 20(1), 25-44.
Ruiz, J. L., Segura, J. V., & Sirvent, I. (2015). Benchmarking and target setting with expert preferences: an application to the evaluation of educational performance of Spanish universities. European Journal of Operational Research, 242(2), 594-605.
Saranya Kantabutra, & John C. S. Tang. (2010). Efficiency analysis of public universities in Thailand. Tertiary Education & Management, 16(100), 15-33.
Schubert, T. (2014). Are there scale economies in scientific production? on the topic of locally increasing returns to scale. Scientometrics, 99(2), 393-408.
Selim, S., & Bursalioglu, S. A. (2013). Analysis of the determinants of universities efficiency in Turkey: application of the data envelopment analysis and panel tobit model. ProcediaSocial and Behavioral Sciences, 89(4), 895-900.
Thanassoulis, E., & Johnes, J. (2011). Costs and efficiency of higher education institutions in England: a DEA analysis. Social Science Electronic Publishing, volume 62(7), 1282- 1297.
Tone, K. (2001). A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 130(3), 498-509.
Veiderpass, A., & Mckelvey, M. (2014). Evaluating the performance of higher education institutions in Europe: a nonparametric efficiency analysis of 944 institutions. Applied Economics. 48(16), 1504-1514
Witte, K. D., Rogge, N., Cherchye, L., & Puyenbroeck, T. V. (2012). Economies of scope in research and teaching: a non-parametric investigation. Omega, 41(2),305-314.
Wolszczak-Derlacz, J., & Parteka, A. (2011). Efficiency of European public higher education institutions: a two-stage multicountry approach. Scientometrics, 89(3), : 887–917.
Ying Chu Ng, & Sung Ko Li. (2000). Measuring the research performance of Chinese higher education institutions: an application of data envelopment analysis. Education Economics, 8(2), 139-156.
Yongmei, H. U., Fan, W., & University, B. N. (2014). Evaluation on the research production efficiency of “211 project” universities: an empirical study based on DEA. Chongqing Higher Education Research. (3)
Zhu, M., Meng, W., Yu, C., & Liu, W. (2013). Evaluation of research efficiency of higher education institutions using DEA models of multi- level classification. Science Research Management, (S1), 221-229

How to cite this article

APA

Chuanyi, W., Xiaohong, L., & Shikui, Z. (2016). The Relative Efficiencies of Research Universities of Science and Technology in China: Based on the Data Envelopment Analysis and Stochastic Frontier Analysis. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(10), 2753-2770. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.02302a

Vancouver

Chuanyi W, Xiaohong L, Shikui Z. The Relative Efficiencies of Research Universities of Science and Technology in China: Based on the Data Envelopment Analysis and Stochastic Frontier Analysis. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2016;12(10):2753-70. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.02302a

AMA

Chuanyi W, Xiaohong L, Shikui Z. The Relative Efficiencies of Research Universities of Science and Technology in China: Based on the Data Envelopment Analysis and Stochastic Frontier Analysis. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2016;12(10), 2753-2770. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.02302a

Chicago

Chuanyi, Wang, Lv Xiaohong, and Zhao Shikui. "The Relative Efficiencies of Research Universities of Science and Technology in China: Based on the Data Envelopment Analysis and Stochastic Frontier Analysis". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2016 12 no. 10 (2016): 2753-2770. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.02302a

Harvard

Chuanyi, W., Xiaohong, L., and Shikui, Z. (2016). The Relative Efficiencies of Research Universities of Science and Technology in China: Based on the Data Envelopment Analysis and Stochastic Frontier Analysis. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(10), pp. 2753-2770. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.02302a

MLA

Chuanyi, Wang et al. "The Relative Efficiencies of Research Universities of Science and Technology in China: Based on the Data Envelopment Analysis and Stochastic Frontier Analysis". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 12, no. 10, 2016, pp. 2753-2770. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.02302a