Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

• Ahmad, N., Aghdam, R. F., Butt, I., & Naveed, A. (2020). Citation-based systematic literature review of energy-growth nexus: An overview of the field and content analysis of the top 50 influential papers. Energy Economics, 86, 104642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2019.104642
• Akcayir, G., & Akcayir, M. (2018). The flipped classroom: A review of its advantages and challenges. Computers & Education, 126, 334-345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.07.021
• Albe, V. (2008). When scientific knowledge, daily life experience, epistemological and social considerations intersect: Students’ argumentation in group discussions on a socio-scientific issue. Research in Science Education, 38(1), 67-90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-007-9040-2
• Arici, F., Yildirim, P., Caliklar, S., & Yilmaz, R. M. (2019). Research trends in the use of augmented reality in science education: Content and bibliometric mapping analysis. Computers & Education, 142, 103647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103647
• Asatullaeva, Z., Aghdam, R. F. Z., Ahmad, N., & Tashpulatova, L. (2021). The impact of foreign aid on economic development: A systematic literature review and content analysis of the top 50 most influential papers. Journal of International Development, 33(4), 717-751. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.3543
• Atasoy, S., Toksoy, S., & Calik, M. (2020). Identifying pre-service teachers’ initial impressions of the concept cartoons in the school corridors and informal physics learning. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 19(1), 25-35. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/20.19.25
• Avargil, S., Kohen, Z., & Dori, Y. J. (2020). Trends and perceptions of choosing chemistry as a major and a career. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 21(2), 668-684. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9RP00158A
• Aylward, B. S., Roberts, M. C., Colombo, J., & Steele, R. G. (2008). Identifying the classics: An examination of articles published in the Journal of Pediatric Psychology from 1976-2006. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 33(6), 576-589. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsm122
• Bennett, J., Lubben, F., Hogarth, S., & Campbell, B. (2005). Systematic reviews of research in science education: Rigor or rigidity? International Journal of Science Education, 27(4), 387-406. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069042000323719
• Birmingham, D., & Barton, A. (2014). Putting on a green carnival: Youth taking educated action on socio-scientific issues. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(3), 286-314. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21127
• Blessinger, K., & Hrycaj, P. (2010). Highly cited articles in library and information science: An analysis of content and authorship trends. Library & Information Science Research, 32, 156-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2009.12.007
• Braun, T., Schubert, A. P., & Kostoff, R. N. (2000). Growth and trends of fullerene research as reflected in its journal literature. Chemical Reviews, 100(1), 23-38. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr990096j
• Brereton, P., Kitchenham, B. A., Budgen, D., Turner, M., & Khalil, M. (2007). Lessons from applying the systematic literature review process within the software engineering domain. Journal of Systems and Software, 80(4), 571-583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2006.07.009
• Bulte, A. M. W., Westbroek, H. B., de Jong, O., & Pilot, A. (2006). A research approach to designing chemistry education using authentic practices as contexts. International Journal of Science Education, 28(9), 1063-1086. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600702520
• Cajas, F. (1999). Public understanding of science: Using technology to enhance school science in everyday life. International Journal of Science Education, 21(7), 765-773. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006999290426
• Calik, M., & Wiyarsi, A. (2021). A systematic review of the research papers on chemistry-focused socio-scientific issues. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 20(3), 360-372. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/21.20.360
• Calik, M., Ayas, A., & Ebenezer, J. V. (2005). A review of solution chemistry studies: Insights into students’ conceptions. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 14(1), 29-50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-005-2732-3
• Calma, A., & Davies, M. (2016). Academy of Management Journal, 1958-2014: A citation analysis. Scientometrics, 108(2), 959-975. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1998-y
• Chan, K. C., Lai, P., & Liano, K. (2012). A threshold citation analysis in marketing research. European Journal of Marketing, 46(1/2), 134-156. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090561211189211
• Chang Rundgren, S.-N., & Rundgren, C.-J. (2010). SEE-SEP: From a separate to a holistic view of socio-scientific issues. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 11.
• Christenson, N., Rundgren, S., & Hoglund, H. (2012). Using the SEE-SEP model to analyze upper secondary students’ use of supporting reasons in arguing socio-scientific issues. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21(3), 342-352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-011-9328-x
• Chu, H.-C., Hwang, G.-H., Tu, Y.-F., & Yang, K.-H. (2022). Roles and research trends of artificial intelligence in higher education: A systematic review of the top 50 most-cited articles. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 38, 22-42.
• Dawson, V., & Schibeci, R. (2003). Western Australian school students’ understanding of biotechnology. International Journal of Science Education, 25(1), 57-69. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690210126720
• Dawson, V., & Venville, G. (2010). Teaching strategies for developing students’ argumentation skills about socio-scientific issues in high school genetics. Research in Science Education, 40(2), 133-148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-008-9104-y
• Dawson, V., & Venville, G. J. (2009). High-school students’ informal reasoning and argumentation about biotechnology: An indicator of scientific literacy? International Journal of Science Education, 31(11), 1421-1445. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690801992870
• Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84(3), 287-312. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200005)84:3<287::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-A
• Eastwood, J. L., Sadler, T. D., Zeidler, D. L., Lewis, A., Amiri, L., & Applebaum, S. (2012). Contextualizing nature of science instruction in socio-scientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, 34(15), 2289-2315. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.667582
• Eilks, I., Marks, R., & Stuckey, M. (2018). Socio-scientific issues as contexts for relevant education and a case on tattooing in chemistry teaching. Educación Química [Chemistry Education], 29, 9. https://doi.org/10.22201/fq.18708404e.2018.1.63680
• Evagorou, M., & Osborne, J. (2013). Exploring young students’ collaborative argumentation within a socio-scientific issue. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(2), 209-237. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21076
• Evagorou, M., Jimenez-Aleixandre, M., & Osborne, J. (2012). “Should we kill the grey squirrels?” A study exploring students’ justifications and decision-making. International Journal of Science Education, 34(3), 401-428. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.619211
• Feierabend, T., & Eilks, I. (2011). Teaching the societal dimension of chemistry using a socio-critical and problem-oriented lesson plan based on bioethanol usage. Journal of Chemical Education, 88(9), 1250-1256. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed1009706
• Flores, L., Rooney, S., Heppner, P., Browne, L., & Wei, M.-F. (1999). Trend analyses of major contributions in the counseling psychologist cited from 1986 to 1996: Impact and implications. Counseling Psychologist, 27, 73-95. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000099271006
• Fowler, S., Zeidler, D., & Sadler, T. (2009). Moral Sensitivity in the context of socio-scientific issues in high school science students. International Journal of Science Education, 31(2), 279-296. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701787909
• Fu, H.-Z., & Ho, Y.-S. (2018). Highly cited articles of corrosion research in science citation index expanded. Asian Journal of Chemistry, 30, 703-710. https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2018.20949
• Furberg, A., & Ludvigsen, S. (2008). Students’ meaning-making of socio-scientific issues in computer mediated settings: Exploring learning through interaction trajectories. International Journal of Science Education, 30(13), 1775-1799. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701543617
• Gilbert, J. K. (2006). On the nature of “context” in chemical education. International Journal of Science Education, 28(9), 957-976. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600702470
• Gil-Montoya, J. A., Navarrete-Cortes, J., Pulgar, R., Santa, S., & Moya-Anegón, F. (2006). World dental research production: An ISI database approach (1999-2003). European Journal of Oral Sciences, 114(2), 102-108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2006.00244.x
• Grace, M. (2009). Developing high quality decision-making discussions about biological conservation in a normal classroom setting. International Journal of Science Education, 31(4), 551-570. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701744595
• Harris, R., & Ratcliffe, M. (2005). Socio-scientific issues and the quality of exploratory talk–What can be learned from schools involved in a ‘collapsed day’ project? Curriculum Journal, 16(4), 439-453. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585170500384396
• Hazelkorn, E., Ryan, C., Beernaert, Y., Constantinou, C., Deca, L., Grangeat, M., Karikorpi, M., Lazoudis, A., Pintó, R., & Welzel-Breuer, M. (2015). Science education for responsible citizenship. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2777/12626
• Hind, A., Leach, J., & Ryder, J. (2001). Teaching about the nature of scientific knowledge and investigation on AS/A level science courses. https://www.nuffieldfoundation.org/sites/default/files/files/TASNuffProjReport.pdf
• Hoepner, A., Kant, B., Scholtens, B., & Yu, P.-S. (2012). Environmental and ecological economics in the 21^st century: An age adjusted citation analysis of the influential articles, journals, authors and institutions. Ecological Economics, 77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.03.002
• Hofstein, A., Eilks, I., & Bybee, R. (2011). Societal issues and their importance for contemporary science education-a pedagogical justification and the state-of-the-art in Israel, Germany and the USA. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(6), 1459-1483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-010-9273-9
• Holbrook, J., & Rannikmae, M. (2007). The nature of science education for enhancing scientific literacy. International Journal of Science Education, 29(11), 1347-1362. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690601007549
• Hooshyar, D., Pedaste, M., Saks, K., Leijen, Ä., Bardone, E., & Wang, M. (2020). Open learner models in supporting self-regulated learning in higher education: A systematic literature review. Computers & Education, 154, 103878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103878
• Howard, G. S., Cole, D. A., & Maxwell, S. E. (1987). Research productivity in psychology based on publication in the journals of the American Psychological Association. American Psychologist, 42, 975-986. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.42.11.975
• Hughes, G. (2000). Marginalization of socio-scientific material in science-technology-society science curricula: Some implications for gender inclusivity and curriculum reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(5), 426-440. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(200005)37:5<426::AID-TEA3>3.0.CO;2-U
• Jeung, C.-W., Yoon, H. J., Park, S., & Jo, S. J. (2011). The contributions of human resource development research across disciplines: A citation and content analysis. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 22(1), 87-109. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.20062
• Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. (2002). Knowledge producers or knowledge consumers? Argumentation and decision making about environmental management. International Journal of Science Education, 24(11), 1171-1190. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690210134857
• Jones, A., Buntting, C., Hipkins, R., McKim, A., Conner, L., & Saunders, K. (2012). Developing students’ futures thinking in science education. Research in Science Education, 42(4), 687-708. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9214-9
• Khishfe, R., & Lederman, N. (2006). Teaching nature of science within a controversial topic: Integrated versus nonintegrated. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(4), 395-418. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20137
• Khishfe, R., Alshaya, F., Boujaoude, S., Mansour, N., & Alrudiyan, K. (2017). Students’ understandings of nature of science and their arguments in the context of four socio-scientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, 39(3), 294-334. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1280741
• Kinshuk, D., Huang, H.-W., Sampson, D., & Chen, N.-S. (2013). Trends in educational technology through the lens of the highly cited articles published in the Journal of Educational Technology and Society. Educational Technology & Society, 16, 3-20.
• Kolstø, S. D. (2001). Scientific literacy for citizenship: Tools for dealing with the science dimension of controversial socio-scientific issues. Science Education, 85(3), 291-310. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.1011
• Lai, C. (2020). Trends of mobile learning: A review of the top 100 highly cited papers. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(3), 721-742. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12884
• Lee, H., Yoo, J., Choi, K., Kim, S., Krajcik, J., Herman, B., & Zeidler, D. (2013). Socio-scientific issues as a vehicle for promoting character and values for global citizens. International Journal of Science Education, 35(12), 2079-2113. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.749546
• Lee, M., Wu, Y., & Tsai, C. (2009). Research trends in science education from 2003 to 2007: A content analysis of publications in selected journals. International Journal of Science Education, 31(15), 1999-2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802314876
• Lin, S., & Mintzes, J. (2010). Learning argumentation skills through instruction in socio-scientific issues: The effect of ability level. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(6), 993-1017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-010-9215-6
• Lin, T.-C., Lin, T.-J., & Tsai, C.-C. (2014). Research trends in science education from 2008 to 2012: A systematic content analysis of publications in selected journals. International Journal of Science Education, 36(8), 1346-1372. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.864428
• Luft, J., Ortega, I., & Wong, S. (2009). NSTA’s state of science education survey. NSTA Reports, 13.
• Marks, R., & Eilks, I. (2009). Promoting scientific literacy using a socio-critical and problem-oriented approach to chemistry teaching: Concept, examples, experiences. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 4(3), 231-245.
• Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
• Mohr, K. A. J., Ding, G., Strong, A. R., Branum, L., Watson, N., Priestley, K., Juth, S., Carpenter, N., & Lundstrom, K. (2017). Reading the past to inform the future: 25 years of the reading teacher. The Reading Teacher, 71(3), 251-264. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1636
• Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004). Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 994-1020. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20035
• Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., …, & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews, 10(1), 89. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4
• Parchmann, I., Gräsel, C., Baer, A., Nentwig, P., Demuth, R., & Ralle, B. (2006). “Chemie im context [Chemistry in context]”: A symbiotic implementation of a context-based teaching and learning approach. International Journal of Science Education, 28(9), 1041-1062. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600702512
• Pedretti, E., & Hodson, D. (1995). From rhetoric to action: Implementing STS education through action research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(5), 463-485. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660320505
• Rudsberg, K., Öhman, J., & Östman, L. (2013). Analyzing students’ learning in classroom discussions about socio-scientific issues. Science Education, 97(4), 594-620. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21065
• Sadler, T. D. (2004). Informal reasoning regarding socio-scientific issues: A critical review of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 513-536. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20009
• Sadler, T. D. (2011). Socio-scientific issues in the classroom. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1159-4
• Sadler, T. D., & Donnelly, L. A. (2006). Socio-scientific argumentation: The effects of content knowledge and morality. International Journal of Science Education, 28(12), 1463-1488. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600708717
• Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. (2005). Patterns of informal reasoning in the context of socio-scientific decision making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(1), 112-138. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20042
• Sadler, T. D., Barab, S., & Scott, B. (2007). What do students gain by engaging in socio-scientific inquiry? Research in Science Education, 37(4), 371-391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-006-9030-9
• Sadler, T. D., Chambers, F. W., & Zeidler, D. L. (2004). Student conceptualizations of the nature of science in response to a socio-scientific issue. International Journal of Science Education, 26(4), 387-409. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000119456
• Sadler, T. D., Romine, W., & Topcu, M. (2016). Learning science content through socio-scientific issues-based instruction: A multi-level assessment study. International Journal of Science Education, 38(10), 1622-1635. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1204481
• Sakschewski, M., Eggert, S., Schneider, S., & Bogeholz, S. (2014). Students’ socio-scientific reasoning and decision-making on energy-related issues–Development of a measurement instrument. International Journal of Science Education, 36(14), 2291-2313. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.920550
• Siddaway, A. P., Wood, A. M., & Hedges, L. V. (2019). How to do a systematic review: A best practice guide for conducting and reporting narrative reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 747-770. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803
• Stuckey, M., & Eilks, I. (2014). Increasing student motivation and the perception of chemistry’s relevance in the classroom by learning about tattooing from a chemical and societal view. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 15(2), 156-167. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3RP00146F
• Stuckey, M., Hofstein, A., Mamlok-Naaman, R., & Eilks, I. (2013). The meaning of ‘relevance’ in science education and its implications for the science curriculum. Studies in Science Education, 49(1), 1-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2013.802463
• Tan, J., Fu, H.-Z., & Ho, Y.-S. (2014). A bibliometric analysis of research on proteomics in science citation index expanded. Scientometrics, 98(2), 1473-1490. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1125-2
• Tang, K.-Y., Li, M.-C., Hsin, C.-T., & Tsai, C.-C. (2016). A co-citation network of young children’s learning with technology. Educational Technology & Society, 19(3), 294-305.
• Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207-222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375
• Varma, K., & Linn, M. (2012). Using interactive technology to support students’ understanding of the greenhouse effect and global warming. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21(4), 453-464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-011-9337-9
• von Aufschnaiter, C., Erduran, S., Osborne, J., & Simon, S. (2008). Arguing to learn and learning to argue: Case studies of how students’ argumentation relates to their scientific knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(1), 101-131. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20213
• Wohlin, C. (2007). An analysis of the most cited articles in software engineering journals–2000. Information and Software Technology, 49(1), 2-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2006.08.004
• Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education–Where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
• Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Applebaum, S., & Callahan, B. E. (2009). Advancing reflective judgment through socio-scientific issues. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(1), 74-101. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20281
• Zeidler, D. L., Walker, K. A., Ackett, W. A., & Simmons, M. L. (2002). Tangled up in views: Beliefs in the nature of science and responses to socio-scientific dilemmas. Science Education, 86(3), 343-367. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10025

APA

Ban, S., & Mahmud, S. N. D. (2024). A systematic review of the top-50 most-cited articles on socio-scientific issues in K-12 education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(4), em2425. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14379

Vancouver

Ban S, Mahmud SND. A systematic review of the top-50 most-cited articles on socio-scientific issues in K-12 education. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2024;20(4):em2425. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14379

AMA

Ban S, Mahmud SND. A systematic review of the top-50 most-cited articles on socio-scientific issues in K-12 education. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2024;20(4), em2425. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14379

Chicago

Ban, Shuo, and Siti Nur Diyana Mahmud. "A systematic review of the top-50 most-cited articles on socio-scientific issues in K-12 education". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2024 20 no. 4 (2024): em2425. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14379

Harvard

Ban, S., and Mahmud, S. N. D. (2024). A systematic review of the top-50 most-cited articles on socio-scientific issues in K-12 education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(4), em2425. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14379

MLA

Ban, Shuo et al. "A systematic review of the top-50 most-cited articles on socio-scientific issues in K-12 education". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 20, no. 4, 2024, em2425. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14379