Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

• Alsfouk, A. A. (2022). Innovation and validation of an assessment method using molecular models following stereochemistry instruction in an organic chemistry course. Journal of Chemical Education, 99(5), 1900-1905. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.1c01267
• Anderson, T. L., & Bodner, G. M. (2008). What can we do about ‘Parker’? A case study of a good student who didn’t ‘get’ organic chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 9(2), 93-101. https://doi.org/10.1039/b806223b
• Anim-Eduful, B., & Adu-Gyamfi, K. (2022a). Chemistry students’ conceptual understanding of organic qualitative analysis. Pedagogical Research, 7(4), em0132. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/12307
• Anim-Eduful, B., & Adu-Gyamfi, K. (2022b). Factors influencing high school chemistry teachers’ and students’ teaching and learning of organic qualitative analysis: A qualitative study. European Journal of Education Studies, 9(7), 194-219. https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v9i7.4378
• Anzovino, M. E., & Bretz, S. L. (2015). Organic chemistry students’ ideas about nucleophiles and electrophiles: The role of charges and mechanisms. Chemical Education Research and Practice, 16, 797–810. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5rp00113g
• Asmussen, G., Rodemer, M., & Bernholt, S. (2023). Blooming student difficulties in dealing with organic reaction mechanisms: An attempt at systemization. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 24, 1035-1054. https://doi.org/10.1039/d2rp00204c
• Ayalew, T. (2015). Assessment of undergraduate chemistry students’ difficulties in organic chemistry. Unisa Press.
• Berisha, E. (2020). Creating a classroom environment where students feel comfortable asking questions and seeking clarification is important for promoting active engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(3), 589-602. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000367
• Blöte, A., Burg, E., & Klein, A. (2001). Students’ flexibility in solving two-digit addition and subtraction problems: Instruction effects. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(3), 627-638. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.93.3.627
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
• Cartrette D. P., & Mayo P. M. (2011). Students’ understanding of acids/bases in organic chemistry contexts, Chemical Education Research and Practice, 12, 29-39. https://doi.org/10.1039/c1rp90005f
• Durmaz, M. (2018). Determination of prospective chemistry teachers’ cognitive structures and misconceptions about stereochemistry. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 6(9), 13-20. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v6i9.3353
• Galloway, K. R., & Bretz, S. L. (2015). Measuring meaningful learning in the undergraduate chemistry laboratory: A national, cross-sectional study. Journal of Chemical Education, 92(12), 2006-2018. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00538
• Gilmore, M. W., Wilkerson, D., & Hassan, R. (2017). The effect of preconceived notions and the lack of fundamental skills while taking general chemistry. Atlas Journal of Science Education, 2(1), 70-76. https://doi.org/10.5147/ajse.v2i1.78
• Hanson, R. (2017). Enhancing students’ performance in organic chemistry through context-based learning and micro activities case study. European Journal of Research and Reflection in Educational Sciences, 5(6), 7-20.
• Hiebert, J. (2013). Conceptual and procedural knowledge: The case of mathematics. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203063538
• Johnstone, A. H. (1991). Why is science difficult to learn? Things are seldom what they seem. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 7, 75-83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.1991.tb00230.x
• Keller, D., & Hermanns, J. (2023). The digital task navigator as a scaffold for supporting higher education students while solving tasks in organic chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 100(10), 3818-3824. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c00518
• Kose, S. (2008). Diagnosing student misconceptions: Using drawings as a research method. World Applied Sciences Journal, 3(2), 283-293.
• Kumi, B., Olimpo, J., Bartlett, F., & Dixon, B. (2013). Evaluating the effectiveness of organic chemistry textbooks in promoting representational fluency and understanding of 2d-3d diagrammatic relationships. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 14(2), 177-187. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3rp20166j
• Luxford, C. J., & Bretz, S. L. (2014). Development of the bonding representations inventory to identify student misconceptions about covalent and ionic bonding representations. Journal of Chemical Education, 91(3), 312-320. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed400700q
• McClary, L. M., & Bretz, S. L. (2012). Development and assessment of a diagnostic tool to identify organic chemistry students’ alternative conceptions related to acid strength. International Journal of Science Education, 34(15), 2317-2341. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.684433
• McMurry, J. E. (2010). Fundamentals of organic chemistry. Cengage Learning.
• O’Dwyer, A., & Childs, P. E. (2017). Who says organic chemistry is difficult? Exploring perspectives and perceptions. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(7), 3599-3620. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00748a
• Oladejo, A. I., Ademola, I. A., Ayanwale, M. A., & O., T. D. (2023). Concept difficulty in secondary school chemistry: An intra-play of gender, school location and school type. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 13(1), 255. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.1902
• Palincsar, A. S. (1998). Social constructivist perspectives on teaching and learning. Annual Review of Psychology, 49(1), 345-375. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.345
• Popova, M., & Bretz, S. L. (2018). Organic chemistry students’ understandings of what makes a good leaving group. Journal of Chemical Education, 95(7), 1094-1101. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.8b00198
• Prodjosantoso, A., Hertina, A., & Irwanto, I. (2019). The misconception diagnosis on ionic and covalent bonds concepts with three-tier diagnostic test. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 1477-1488. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12194a
• Salame, I. I., & Khalil, A. Y. (2023). Examining some of the challenges students face in learning about rearrangement reactions in organic chemistry. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 19(3), e2310. https://doi.org/10.29333/ijese/13203
• Silva, J., Uchoa, D., Lima, M., & Monteiro, A. (2019). Stereochemistry game: Creating and playing a fun board game to engage students in reviewing stereochemistry concepts. Journal of Chemical Education, 96(8), 1680-1685. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.8b00897
• Smith, K. A., Sheppard, S. D., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2005). Pedagogies of engagement: Classroom-based practices. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00831.x
• Stroumpouli, C., & Tsaparlis, G. (2022). Chemistry students’ conceptual difficulties and problem-solving behavior in chemical kinetics, as a component of an introductory physical chemistry course. Chemistry Teacher International, 4(3), 279-296. https://doi.org/10.1515/cti-2022-0005
• Taber, K. S. (2019). The nature of the chemical concept: Re-constructing chemical knowledge in teaching and learning. Royal Society of Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1039/9781788013611
• Widarti, H. R., Retnosari, R., & Marfu’ah, S. (2017). Misconception of pre-service chemistry teachers about the concept of resonances in organic chemistry course. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1868, 030014. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4995113
• Windschitl, M., & Andre, T. (1998). Using computer simulations to enhance conceptual change: The roles of constructivist instruction and student epistemological beliefs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(2), 145-160. https://doi.org/10.31274/rtd-180813-17039
• Xue, D., & Stains M. (2020). Exploring students’ understanding of resonance and its relationship to instruction, Journal of Chemical Education, 97, 894-902. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00066
• Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. SAGE.
• York, T. T., & Orgill, M. K. (2020). Continuously improving teaching skills through professional development and staying updated on the latest pedagogical approaches and research in chemistry education is essential. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(9), 2673-2682.
• Zoller, U., & Tsaparlis, G. (1997). Higher and lower-order cognitive skills: The case of chemistry. Research in Science Education, 27, 117-130. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02463036

APA

Boateng, S. (2024). Assessing conceptual difficulties experienced by pre-service chemistry teachers in organic chemistry. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(2), em2398. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14156

Vancouver

Boateng S. Assessing conceptual difficulties experienced by pre-service chemistry teachers in organic chemistry. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2024;20(2):em2398. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14156

AMA

Boateng S. Assessing conceptual difficulties experienced by pre-service chemistry teachers in organic chemistry. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2024;20(2), em2398. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14156

Chicago

Boateng, Sakyiwaa. "Assessing conceptual difficulties experienced by pre-service chemistry teachers in organic chemistry". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2024 20 no. 2 (2024): em2398. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14156

Harvard

Boateng, S. (2024). Assessing conceptual difficulties experienced by pre-service chemistry teachers in organic chemistry. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(2), em2398. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14156

MLA

Boateng, Sakyiwaa "Assessing conceptual difficulties experienced by pre-service chemistry teachers in organic chemistry". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 20, no. 2, 2024, em2398. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14156