Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

• Acikgul, K., & Aslaner, R. (2020). Effects of GeoGebra supported micro teaching applications and technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) game practices on TPACK levels of prospective teachers. Education and Information Technologies, 25(3), 2023-2047. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10044-y
• Alabdulaziz, M. S. (2021). COVID-19 and the use of digital technology in mathematics education. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 7609-7633. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10602-3
• Alneyadi, S., & Wardat, Y. (2023). ChatGPT: Revolutionizing student achievement in the electronic magnetism unit for eleventh-grade students in Emirates schools. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(4), ep448. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13417
• Angeli, C., Valanides, N., & Christodoulou, A. (2016). Theoretical considerations of technological pedagogical content knowledge. In M. C. Herring, M. J. Koehler, & P. Mishra (Eds.), Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) for educators (pp. 11-32). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315771328
• Bingimlas, K. A. (2009). Barriers to the successful integration of ICT in teaching and learning environments: A review of the literature. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 5(3), 235-245. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75275
• Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods. Oxford University Press.
• Byrne, B. M. (2016). Structural equation modeling with Amos basic concepts, applications, and programming. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315757421
• Caniglia, J., & Meadows, M. (2018). Pre-service mathematics teachers’ use of web resources. International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education, 25(3), 17-34. https://www.proquest.com/docview/2131581135?pq-origsite=gscholar&fromopenview=true
• Cao, Y., Zhang, S., Chan, M. C. E., & Kang, Y. (2021). Post-pandemic reflections: Lessons from Chinese mathematics teachers about online mathematics instruction. Asia Pacific Education Review, 22(2), 157-168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-021-09694-w
• Cetin, I., & Erdogan, A. (2018). Development, validity and reliability study of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) efficiency scale for mathematics teacher candidates. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 5(1), 50-62. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1207506
• Chai, C. S., Jong, M. S. Y., Yin, H. B., Chen, M. Y., & Zhou, W. Y. (2019). Validating and modelling teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge for integrative science, technology, engineering and mathematics education. Educational Technology & Society, 22(3), 61-73. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26896710
• Chai, C. S., Ng, E. M. W., Li, W., Hong, H. Y., & Koh, J. H. L. (2013). Validating and modelling technological pedagogical content knowledge framework among Asian preservice teachers. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(1), 41-53. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.174
• Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315456539
• De Vita, M., Verschaffel, L., & Elen, J. (2018). The power of interactive whiteboards for secondary mathematics teaching: Two case studies. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 47(1), 50-78. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239518767112
• DeVellis, R. F. (2017). Scale development theory and applications. SAGE.
• Drijvers, P. (2015). Digital technology in mathematics education: Why it works (or doesn’t). In S. J. Cho (Ed.), Selected regular lectures from the 12^th International Congress on Mathematical Education (pp. 135-151). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17187-6_8
• Drijvers, P., Doorman, M., Boon, P., Reed, H., & Gravemeijer, K. (2010). The teacher and the tool: Instrumental orchestrations in the technology-rich mathematics classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 75(2), 213-234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-010-9254-5
• Gao, X. (2021). The development of problem solving in Chinese mathematics curricula. In B. Xu, Y. Zhu, & X. Lu (Eds.), Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 87-108). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68157-9
• Giannakos, M. N., Doukakis, S., Pappas, I. O., Adamopoulos, N., & Giannopoulou, P. (2014). Investigating teachers’ confidence on technological pedagogical and content knowledge: An initial validation of TPACK scales in K-12 computing education context. Journal of Computers in Education, 2(1), 43-59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-014-0024-8
• Gonzales, G. G., & Gonzales, R. R. (2021). Introducing IWB to preservice mathematics teachers: An evaluation using TPACK framework. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 16(2), 436-450. https://doi.org/10.18844/CJES.V16I2.5619
• Graham, C. R. (2011). Theoretical considerations for understanding technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Computers & Education, 57(3), 1953-1960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.04.010
• Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective. Pearson.
• Hamad, S., Tairab, H., Wardat, Y., Rabbani, L., AlArabi, K., Yousif, M., Abu-Al-Aish, A., & Stoica, G. (2022). Understanding science teachers’ implementations of integrated STEM: Teacher perceptions and practice. Sustainability, 14(6), 3594. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063594
• Harris, J. B., & Hofer, M. J. (2011). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) in action: A descriptive study of secondary teachers’ curriculum-based, technology-related instructional planning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(3), 211-229. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2011.10782570
• Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
• Ho, R. (2014). Handbook of univariate and multivariate data analysis with IBM SPSS. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.1201/b15605
• Hoyles, C. (2018). Transforming the mathematical practices of learners and teachers through digital technology. Research in Mathematics Education, 20(3), 209-228. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2018.1484799
• Ifinedo, E., & Kankaanranta, M. (2021). Understanding the influence of context in technology integration from teacher educators’ perspective. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 30(2), 201-215. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939x.2020.1867231
• Khong, H., Celik, I., Le, T. T. T., Lai, V. T. T., Nguyen, A., & Bui, H. (2023). Examining teachers’ behavioral intention for online teaching after COVID-19 pandemic: A large-scale survey. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 5999-6026. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11417-6
• Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Cain, W. (2013). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Journal of Education, 193(3), 13-19. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205741319300303
• Koh, J. H. L., Chai, C. S., & Lim, W. Y. (2016). Teacher professional development for TPACK-21CL. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 55(2), 172-196. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633116656848
• Koh, J. H. L., Chai, C. S., & Tsai, C. C. (2010). Examining the technological pedagogical content knowledge of Singapore pre-service teachers with a large-scale survey. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(6), 563-573. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00372.x
• Li, M. (2023). Chinese mathematics teachers’ TPACK and attitudes toward ICT integration in the post-pandemic era. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(7), em2301. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13346
• Mailizar, M., Hidayat, M., & Al-Manthari, A. (2021). Examining the impact of mathematics teachers’ TPACK on their acceptance of online professional development. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 37(3), 196-212. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2021.1934613
• Martinovic, D., & Karadag, Z. (2012). Dynamic and interactive mathematics learning environments: The case of teaching the limit concept. Teaching Mathematics and its Applications, 31(1), 41-48. https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/hrr029
• Mella-Norambuena, J., Cobo-Rendon, R., Lobos, K., Sáez-Delgado, F., & Maldonado-Trapp, A. (2021). Smartphone use among undergraduate STEM students during COVID-19: An opportunity for higher education? Education Sciences, 11(8), 417. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11080417
• Ministry of Education the People's Republic of China. (2019). The opinions on the implementation of the national primary and secondary school teachers' information technology application ability enhancement project 2.0. http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A10/s7034/201904/t20190402_376493.html
• Mishra, P. (2019). Considering contextual knowledge: TPACK diagram gets an upgrade. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 35(2), 76-78. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2019.1588611
• Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054. https://www.tcrecord.org/content.asp?contentid=12516
• Niess, M. L. (2011). Investigating TPACK: Knowledge growth in teaching with technology. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 44(3), 299-317. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.44.3.c
• Niess, M. L., Ronau, R. N., Shafer, K. G., Driskell, S. O., Harper S. R., Johnston, C., Browning, C., Ozgun-Koca, S. A., & Kersaint, G. (2009). Mathematics teacher TPACK standards and development model. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 4-24. https://citejournal.org/volume-9/issue-1-09/mathematics/mathematics-teacher-tpack-standards-and-development-model/
• Noori, A. Q. (2021). The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on students’ learning in higher education in Afghanistan. Heliyon, 7(10), e08113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08113
• Noori, A. Q., Orfan, S. N., Akramy, S. A., & Hashemi, A. (2022). The use of social media in EFL learning and teaching in higher education of Afghanistan. Cogent Social Sciences, 8(1), 2027613. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2022.2027613
• Patahuddin, S. M., Lowrie, T., & Dalgarno, B. (2016). Analyzing mathematics teachers’ TPACK through observation of practice. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 25(5-6), 863-872. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-016-0305-2
• Porras-Hernández, L. H., & Salinas-Amescua, B. (2013). Strengthening TPACK: A broader notion of context and the use of teacher’s narratives to reveal knowledge construction. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 48(2), 223-244. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.48.2.f
• Rakes, C. R., Stites, M. L., Ronau, R. N., Bush, S. B., Fisher, M. H., Safi, F., Desai, S., Schmidt, A., Andreasen, J. B., Saderholm, J., Amick, L., Mohr-Schroeder, M. J., & Viera, J. (2022). Teaching mathematics with technology: TPACK and effective teaching practices. Education Sciences, 12(2), 133. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12020133
• Rezat, S. (2021). How automated feedback from a digital mathematics textbook affects primary students’ conceptual development: Two case studies. ZDM-Mathematics Education, 53(6), 1433-1445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-021-01263-0
• Roni, S. M. (2021). Data analysis with SPSS for survey-based research. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0193-4
• Rosenberg, J. M., & Koehler, M. J. (2015). Context and technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): A systematic review. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 47(3), 186-210. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2015.1052663
• Sahin, I. (2011). Development of survey of technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK). The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(1), 97-105. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ926558.pdf
• Schmidt, D. A., Baran, E., Thompson, A. D., Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., & Shin, T. S. (2009). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): The development and validation of an assessment instrument for preservice teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(2), 123-149. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2009.10782544
• Scott, K. C. (2021). A review of faculty self-assessment TPACK instruments (January 2006-March 2020). International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 17(2), 118-137. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijicte.2021040108
• Scott, K. C., & Nimon, K. (2020). Construct validity of data from a TPACK self-assessment instrument in 2-year public college faculty in the United States. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 53(4), 427-445. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1790444
• Shi, Y., Zhang, J., Yang, H., & Yang, H. H. (2020). Effects of interactive whiteboard-based instruction on students’ cognitive learning outcomes: A meta-analysis. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(2), 283-300. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1769683
• Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004
• Su, X., Huang, X., Zhou, C., & Chang, M. (2017). A technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) scale for geography teachers in senior high school. Education and Science, 42(190), 325-341. https://doi.org/10.15390/eb.2017.6849
• Sun, S., Wu, X., & Xu, T. (2023). A theoretical framework for a mathematical cognitive model for adaptive learning systems. Behavioral Sciences, 13(5), 406. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13050406
• Tanu Wijaya, T. (2020). How Chinese students learn mathematics during the coronavirus pandemic. IJERI: International Journal of Educational Research and Innovation, 15, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.46661/ijeri.4950
• Valtonen, T., Sointu, E., Kukkonen, J., Kontkanen, S., Lambert, M. C., & Mäkitalo-Siegl, K. (2017). TPACK updated to measure pre-service teachers’ twenty-first century skills. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(3), 15-31. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3518
• Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Pareja Roblin, N., Tondeur, J., & van Braak, J. (2013). Technological pedagogical content knowledge–A review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(2), 109-121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2012.00487.x
• Wang, L., Liu, Q., Du, X., & Liu, J. (2017). Chinese mathematics curriculum reform in the 21st century: A review. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(8), 5311-5326. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.01005a
• Wardat, Y., Tashtoush, M. A., AlAli, R., & Jarrah, A. M. (2023). ChatGPT: A revolutionary tool for teaching and learning mathematics. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(7), em2286. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13272
• Willermark, S. (2018). Technological pedagogical and content knowledge: A review of empirical studies published from 2011 to 2016. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 56(3), 315-343. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633117713114
• Xiong, X. B., Chai, C. S., Tsai, C. C., & Liang, J. C. (2020). Exploring the relationship between Chinese pre-service teachers’ epistemic beliefs and their perceptions of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Educational Studies, 48(6), 750-771. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2020.1814698
• Yao, X., & Zhao, J. (2022). Chinese mathematics teachers’ use of digital technologies for instruction: A survey study. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(8), em2135. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12209
• Zambak, V. S., & Tyminski, A. M. (2019). Examining mathematical technological knowledge of pre-service middle grades teachers with Geometer’s Sketchpad in a geometry course. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 51(2), 183-207. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739x.2019.1650302
• Zhang, J., Fang, Y., & Ma, X. (2010). The latest progress report on ICT application in Chinese basic education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(4), 567-573. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01083.x

APA

Li, M., Noori, A. Q., & Li, Y. (2023). Development and validation of the secondary mathematics teachers’ TPACK scale: A study in the Chinese context. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(11), em2350. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13671

Vancouver

Li M, Noori AQ, Li Y. Development and validation of the secondary mathematics teachers’ TPACK scale: A study in the Chinese context. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2023;19(11):em2350. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13671

AMA

Li M, Noori AQ, Li Y. Development and validation of the secondary mathematics teachers’ TPACK scale: A study in the Chinese context. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2023;19(11), em2350. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13671

Chicago

Li, Mao, Abdul Qawi Noori, and Yanxi Li. "Development and validation of the secondary mathematics teachers’ TPACK scale: A study in the Chinese context". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2023 19 no. 11 (2023): em2350. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13671

Harvard

Li, M., Noori, A. Q., and Li, Y. (2023). Development and validation of the secondary mathematics teachers’ TPACK scale: A study in the Chinese context. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(11), em2350. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13671

MLA

Li, Mao et al. "Development and validation of the secondary mathematics teachers’ TPACK scale: A study in the Chinese context". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 19, no. 11, 2023, em2350. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13671