Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

• Aivelo, T., & Uitto, A. (2018). Teachers’ approaches to genetics teaching mirror their choice of content and avoidance of sensitive issues. BioRxiv, 350710. https://doi.org/10.1101/350710
• Akinoglu, O., & Tandogan, R. O. (2007). The effects of problem-based active learning in science education on students’ academic achievement, attitude, and concept learning. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 3(1), 71-81. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75375
• Alrwaished, N., Alkandari, A., & Alhashem, F. (2017). Exploring in- and pre-service science and mathematics teachers’ technology, pedagogy, and content knowledge (TPACK): What next? EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(9), 6113-6131. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.01053a
• Arends, R. I. (2012). Learning to teach. McGraw-Hill.
• Atun, H., & Usta, E. (2019). The effects of programming education planned with TPACK framework on learning outcomes. Participatory Educational Research, 6(2), 26-36. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.19.10.6.2
• Bahri, A., & Corebima, A. D. (2015). The contribution of learning motivation and metacognitive skill on cognitive learning outcome of students within different learning strategies. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 14(4), 487-500. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/15.14.487
• Bahri, A., Suryani Idris, I., Nurman, R., & Ristiana, E. (2019). PBLRQA strategy potential in enhancing metacognitive skills of students with different academic achievement. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1317, 012199. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1317/1/012199
• Banayo, A., & Barleta, C. J. (2022). Online education as an active learning environment in the new normal. International Journal of Educational Management and Development Studies, 2(4), 72-96. https://doi.org/10.53378/352078
• Brown, A. L. (2014). Implementing active learning in an online teacher education course. American Journal of Distance Education, 28(3), 170-182. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2014.924695
• Brown, C. A., & Neal, R. E. (2011). Using 21^st century thinking skills applied to the TPACK instructional model [Paper presentation]. Annual Meeting of the AECT International Convention.
• Choden, T., & Kijkuakul, S. (2020). Blending problem based learning with scientific argumentation to enhance students understanding of basic genetics. International Journal of Instruction, 13(1), 445-462. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13129a
• Cimer, A. (2012). What makes biology learning difficult and effective: Students views. Educational Research and Reviews, 7(3), 61-71.
• Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315456539
• Corfman, T. D. (2017). Creativity in asynchronous online discussions [Doctoral dissertation, Walden University].
• Doering, A., Veletsianos, G., Scharber, C., & Miller, C. (2009). Using the technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge framework to design online learning environments and professional development. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 41(3), 319-346. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.41.3.d
• Duncan, R. G., & Tseng, K. A. (2011). Designing project-based instruction to foster generative and mechanistic understandings in genetics. Science Education, 95(1), 21-56. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20407
• Fauzi, A., & Fariantika, A. (2018). Courses perceived difficult by undergraduate students majoring in biology. Biosfer, 11(2), 78-89. https://doi.org/10.21009/biosferjpb.v11n2.78-89
• Fauzi, A., & Ramadani, S. D. (2017). Learning the genetics concepts through project activities using drosophila melanogaster: A qualitative Descriptive study. Journal of Biological Education Indonesia, 3(3), 238-247. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v3i3.4897
• Ferrari, A., Cachia, R., & Punie, Y. (2009). Innovation and creativity in education and training in the EU member states: Fostering creative learning and supporting innovative teaching. JRC. https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC62370
• Ferreira, M., & Trudel, A. (2012). The impact of problem based learning (PBL) on student attitudes toward science, problem-solving skills, and sense of community in the classroom. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 47(1), 23-30.
• Fonseca, V. M. F., & Gómez, J. (2017). Applying active methodologies for teaching software engineering in computer engineering. Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologias Del Aprendizaje [Iberoamerican Journal of Learning Technologies], 12(3), 147-155. https://doi.org/10.1109/RITA.2017.2738178
• Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. PNAS, 111(23), 8410-8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
• Greenstein, L. (2012). Assessing 21^st century skills: A guide to evaluating mastery and authentic learning. SAGE.
• Gross, M. E., Zedelius, C. M., & Schooler, J. W. (2020). Cultivating an understanding of curiosity as a seed for creativity. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 35, 77-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.07.015
• Hariyadi, S., Corebima, A. D., Zubaidah, S., & Ibrohim, I. (2017). The comparison of the question types in the RQA (reading, questioning, and answering) learning model and conventional learning model. International Journal of Humanities Social Sciences and Education, 4(7), 10-18. https://doi.org/10.20431/2349-0381.0407002
• Hatta, P., Aristyagama, Y. H., Yuana, R. A., & Yulisetiani, S. (2020). Active learning strategies in synchronous online learning for elementary school students. Indonesian Journal of Informatics Education, 4(2), 86-93. https://doi.org/10.20961/ijie.v4i2.46019
• Irdalisa, Paidi, & Djukri. (2020). Implementation of technology-based guided inquiry to improve TPACK among prospective biology teachers. International Journal of Instruction, 13(2), 33-44. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.1323a
• Johnson, J., & Jackson, F. (2015). Use of multiple intelligence modalities to convey genetic and genomic concepts in African American College biology students. Natural Science, 07(06), 299-308. https://doi.org/10.4236/ns.2015.76033
• Joy, K.-K. (2015). A proposed model to increase creativity, collaboration, and accountability in the online classroom. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 5(11), 873-876. https://doi.org/10.7763/ijiet.2015.v5.630
• Kaplan, D. E. (2019). Creativity in education: Teaching for creativity development. Psychology, 10(02), 140-147. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2019.102012
• Kibuka-Sebitosi, E. (2007). Understanding genetics and inheritance in rural schools. Journal of Biological Education, 41(2), 56-61. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2007.9656063
• Kitchens, B., Means, T., & Tan, Y. (2018). Captivate: Building blocks for implementing active learning. Journal of Education for Business, 93(2), 58-73. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2017.1417232
• Knippels, M. C. P. J., Waarlo, A. J., & Boersma, K. T. (2005). Design criteria for learning and teaching genetics. Journal of Biological Education, 39(3), 108-112. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2005.9655976
• Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Cain, W. (2013). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Journal of Education, 193(3), 13-19. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205741319300303
• Kuo, Y. C., & Kuo, Y. T. (2015). Active learning in online learning environments for adult learners. In Proceedings of the Annual Convention of the Association of Educational Communications and Technology (pp. 242-248).
• Kutaka-Kennedy, J. (2015). A proposed model to increase creativity, collaboration, and accountability in the online classroom. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 5(11), 873-876. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJIET.2015.V5.630
• Lapek, J. (2018). Promoting 21^st century skills in problem-based learning environments. CTETE-Research Monograph Series, 1(1), 66-85. https://doi.org/10.21061/ctete-rms.v1.c.4
• Lombardi, D., Shipley, T. F., Bailey, J. M., Bretones, P. S., Prather, E. E., Ballen, C. J., Knight, J. K., Smith, M. K., Stowe, R. L., Cooper, M. M., Prince, M., Atit, K., Uttal, D. H., LaDue, N. D., McNeal, P. M., Ryker, K., St. John, K., van der Hoeven Kraft, K. J., & Docktor, J. L. (2021). The curious construct of active learning. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 22(1), 8-43. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100620973974
• Maksić, S. B., & Spasenović, V. Z. (2018). Educational science students implicit theories of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 30(3), 287-294. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2018.1488200
• Michael, J. (2006). Where’s the evidence that active learning works? American Journal of Physiology-Advances in Physiology Education, 30(4), 159-167. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00053.2006
• Millis, B. J. (2012). Active learning strategies in face-to-face courses. IDEA Paper, 53, 1-8.
• Mintu-Wimsatt, A., Sadler, T., & Ingram, K. (2007). Creativity in online courses: Perceptions of MBA students. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 3(4), 324-330.
• Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2008). Introducing technological pedagogical content knowledge [Paper presentation]. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association.
• Mitchell, A., Petter, S., & Harris, A. L. (2017). Learning by doing: Twenty successful active learning exercises for information systems courses. Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice, 16(1), 21-46. https://doi.org/10.28945/3643
• Muralidhar, K. (2013). Biology education, creativity, & career. International Journal of Applied and Natural Sciences, 2(2), 53-64.
• Murray-Nseula, M. (2011). Incorporating case studies into an undergraduate genetics course. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 11(3), 75-85.
• Navaneedhan, C. G., & Kamalanabhan, T. J. (2016). Is metaphorical thinking related to development of cognitive structures among learners? World Scientific News, 52, 1-13.
• NEA. (2012). Preparing 21^st century students for a global society: An educator’s guide to” the four Cs. National Education Association. https://dl.icdst.org/pdfs/files3/0d3e72e9b873e0ef2ed780bf53a347b4.pdf
• Nikolopoulou, K. (2018). Creativity and ICT: Theoretical approaches and perspectives in school education. In T. A. Mikropoulos (Ed.), Research on e-learning and ICT in education (pp. 87-100). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95059-4_5
• Northcott, B., Miliszewska, I., & Dakich, E. (2007). ICT for (I)nspiring (C)reative (T)hinking. In Proceedings Ascilite Singapore 2007 (pp. 761-768).
• Novo, A., Bastos, G., & Vasconcelos, A. I. (2016). Effects of a virtual learning environment on librarians’ information literacy and digital literacy competences. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Information Literacy (pp. 655-664). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52162-6_64
• Olatoye, R., Akintunde, S., & Ogunsanya, E. (2010). Relationship between creativity and academic achievement of business administration students in Southwestern Polytechnics, Nigeria. African Research Review, 4(3), 134-149. https://doi.org/10.4314/afrrev.v4i3.60164
• Papaleontiou-Louca, E., Varnava-Marouchou, D., Mihai, S., & Konis, E. (2014). Teaching for creativity in universities. Journal of Education and Human Development, 3(4), 131-154. https://doi.org/10.15640/jehd.v3n4a13
• Pllana, D. (2019). Creativity in modern education. World Journal of Education, 9(2), 136-140. https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v9n2p136
• Ray Gehani, R. (2011). Individual creativity and the influence of mindful leaders on enterprise innovation. Journal of Technology Management and Innovation, 6(3), 82-92. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-27242011000300006
• Reche, I., & Perfectti, F. (2020). Promoting individual and collective creativity in science students. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 35(9), 745-748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2020.06.002
• Riegel, C., & Kozen, A. (2016). Attaining 21^st century skills in a virtual classroom. Educational Planning, 23(3), 41-55.
• Rosenberg, J. M., & Koehler, M. J. (2015). Context and technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): A systematic review. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 47(3), 186-210. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2015.1052663
• Samašonok, K., & Leškienė, B. (2015). Creativity development: Theoretical and practical aspects. Journal of Creativity and Business, 1, 19-34.
• Sandika, B., & Fitrihidajati, H. (2018). Improving creative thinking skills and scientific attitude through inquiry-based learning in basic biology lecture toward student of biology education. Journal of Biological Education Indonesia, 4(1), 23-28. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v4i1.5326
• Scheffer, M., Baas, M., & Bjordam, T. K. (2017). Teaching originality? Common habits behind creative production in science and arts. Ecology and Society, 22(2), 29. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09258-220229
• Seechaliao, T. (2017). Instructional strategies to support creativity and innovation in education. Journal of Education and Learning, 6(4), 201-208. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v6n4p201
• Shively, C. H. (2011). Grow creativity! International Society for Technology in Education, 38(7), 10-15.
• Songkram, N. (2015). E-learning system in virtual learning environment to develop creative thinking for learners in higher education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 674-679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.600
• Sothayapetch, P., & Lavonen, J. (2022). Technological pedagogical content knowledge of primary school science teachers during the COVID-19 in Thailand and Finland. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(7), em2124. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12118
• Starbek, P., Starčič Erjavec, M., & Peklaj, C. (2010). Teaching genetics with multimedia results in better acquisition of knowledge and improvement in comprehension. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(3), 214-224. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2009.00344.x
• Stoilescu, D. (2015). A critical examination of the technological pedagogical content knowledge framework: Secondary school mathematics teachers integrating technology. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 52(4), 514-547. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633115572285
• Tanak, A. (2018). Designing TPACK-based course for preparing student teachers to teach science with technological pedagogical content knowledge. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 41(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2018.07.012
• Treffinger, D. J., Young, G. C., Selby, E. C., & Shepardson, C. (2002). Assessing creativity: A guide for educators. The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED505548
• Yilmaz, D., Tekkaya, C., & Sungur, S. (2011). The comparative effects of prediction/discussion-based learning cycle, conceptual change text, and traditional instructions on student understanding of genetics. International Journal of Science Education, 33(5), 607-628. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500691003657758

APA

Angraini, E., Zubaidah, S., Susanto, H., & Omar, N. (2022). Enhancing creativity in genetics using three teaching strategies-based TPACK model. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(12), em2196. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12697

Vancouver

Angraini E, Zubaidah S, Susanto H, Omar N. Enhancing creativity in genetics using three teaching strategies-based TPACK model. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2022;18(12):em2196. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12697

AMA

Angraini E, Zubaidah S, Susanto H, Omar N. Enhancing creativity in genetics using three teaching strategies-based TPACK model. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2022;18(12), em2196. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12697

Chicago

Angraini, Erni, Siti Zubaidah, Hendra Susanto, and Noritah Omar. "Enhancing creativity in genetics using three teaching strategies-based TPACK model". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2022 18 no. 12 (2022): em2196. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12697

Harvard

Angraini, E., Zubaidah, S., Susanto, H., and Omar, N. (2022). Enhancing creativity in genetics using three teaching strategies-based TPACK model. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(12), em2196. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12697

MLA

Angraini, Erni et al. "Enhancing creativity in genetics using three teaching strategies-based TPACK model". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 18, no. 12, 2022, em2196. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12697