Highly Recommended and Poorly Used: English and Spanish Science Teachers’ Views of Inquiry-based Learning (IBL) and its Enactment

Marta Romero-Ariza; Antonio Quesada; Ana Maria Abril; Peter Sorensen; Mary Colette Oliver

doi:10.29333/ejmste/109658

Full Text (PDF)

Marta Romero-Ariza ¹, Antonio Quesada ¹, Ana Maria Abril ¹, Peter Sorensen ², Mary Colette Oliver ² ^*

More Detail

¹ University of Jaen, SPAIN² University of Nottingham, UK^* Corresponding Author

Abstract

Inquiry pedagogies provide opportunities to meet learning outcomes linked to developing scientific literacy. Within a European project intended at promoting Inquiry Based Learning (IBL), this paper presents quantitative and qualitative data about teachers’ views of IBL and its enactment in England and Spain. Results show that teachers in both countries hold positive views based on benefits to students and science learning and perceive important systemic and personal barriers to the successful implementation, even after decades of political efforts. Teachers express frustration with the lack of time, teaching resources, classroom management and the demands of curriculum delivery, assessment and accountability. There is an emphasis on hands-on activities and students’ motivation but no stress on cognitive and epistemic aspects, showing views not well aligned with current understanding of the type of inquiry that best support learning. Implications for research and practice suggest that there is still a need to expand knowledge about how to support teachers in making the most of this pedagogy.

Keywords

inquiry
scientific literacy
scientific practices
teachers’ views
teacher professional development

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Research Article

EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed, 2020, Volume 16, Issue 1, Article No: em1793

https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/109658

Publication date: 07 Sep 2019

Article Views: 3688

Article Downloads: 1629

Open Access References How to cite this article

References

Abd-El-Khalick, F., BouJaoude, S., Duschl, R., Lederman, N. G., Mamlok-Naaman, R., Hofstein, A., … Tuan, H.-l. (2004). Inquiry in science education: International perspectives. Science Education, 88(3), 397-419. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10118.
Alfieri, L., Brooks, P. J., Aldrich, N. J., & Tenenbaum, H. R. (2011). Does discovery-based instruction enhance learning? Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021017.
Ariza, M. R., Aguirre, D., Quesada, A., Abril, A., & García. F. J. (2016). Wool or metal? Inquiry Based Learning on the thermal properties of common materials (¿Lana o metal? Una propuesta de aprendizaje por indagación para el estudio de las propiedades térmicas de materiales comunes). Revista Electrónica de Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 15(2), 297-311.
Asay, L. D., & Orgill, M. K. (2010). Analysis of Essential Features of Inquiry Found in Articles Published in The Science Teacher, 1998-2007. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21, 57-79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-009-9152-9.
Buehl, M. M., & Beck, J. S. (2015). The relationship between teachers’ beliefs and teachers’ practices. In H. Fives & M.G. Gill (Eds.), International handbook of research on teachers’ beliefs (pp. 66-84). New York: Routledge.
Capps, D. K., & Crawford, B. A. (2013). Inquiry-Based Instruction and Teaching About Nature of Science: Are They Happening? Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24, 497-526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-012-9314-z.
Capps, D. K., Shemwell, J. T., & Young, A. M. (2016). Over reported and misunderstood? A study of teachers’ reported enactment and knowledge of inquiry-based science teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 38(6), 934-959. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1173261.
Charmaz, K., & McMullen, L. M. (2011). Five ways of doing qualitative analysis: Phenomenological psychology, grounded theory, discourse analysis, narrative research, and intuitive inquiry. New York: Guilford Press.
Crawford, B. A. (2000). Embracing the Essence of Inquiry: New Roles for Science Teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(9), 916-937. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200011)37:9<916::AID-TEA4>3.0.CO;2-2.
Crawford, B. A. (2014). From Inquiry to Scientific Practices in the Science Classroom. In Lederman, N. G., & S. K. Abell, S. K. (Eds.), Handbook of Research in Science Education (vol. II, pp. 515-541) New York: Routledge.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed-methods research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SGE Publications, Inc.
Donnell, L. A., & Gettinger, M. (2015). Elementary school teachers’ acceptability of school reform: Contribution of belief congruence, self-efficacy, and professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 51, 47-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.06.003.
Duschl, R. A., & Bybee, R. W. (2014). Planning and carrying out investigations: an entry to learning and to teacher professional development around NGSS science and engineering practices. International Journal of STEM Education, 1(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-014-0012-6.
Engeln, K., Euler, M., & Maass, K. (2013). Inquiry-based learning in mathematics and science: a comparative baseline study of teachers’ beliefs and practices across 12 European countries. ZDM, 45(6), 823-836. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0507-5.
European Commission (2007). Science Education Now. A renewed pedagogy for the future of Europe. Luxembourg: Offices for Official Publications of the European Communities. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/report-rocard-on-science-education_en.pdf.
European Commission (2015). Science Education for Responsible Citizenship. Luxembourg: Offices for Official Publications of the European Communities. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/research/swafs/pdf/pub_science_education/KI-NA-26-893-EN-N.pdf.
Forbes, C. T., & Davis, E. A. (2010). Curriculum design for inquiry: Pre-service elementary teachers’ mobilization and adaptation of science curriculum materials. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(7), 820-839. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20379.
Furtak, E. M., Seidel, T., Iverson, H., & Briggs, D. C. (2012 online). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Studies of Inquiry-Based Science Teaching. Review of Educational Research, 82(3), 300-329. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654312457206.
Gillies, R. M., Nichols, K., Burgh, G., & Haynes, M. (2014). Primary students’ scientific reasoning and discourse during cooperative inquiry-based science activities. International Journal of Educational Research, 63, 127-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2013.01.001.
Glackin, M. (2016). ‘Risky fun’ or ‘Authentic science’? How teachers’ beliefs influence their practice during a professional development programme on outdoor learning. International Journal of Science Education, 38(3), 409-433. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1145368.
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: a synthesis of meta-analyses relating to achievement. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203887332.
Herrington, D. G., Bancroft, S. F., Edwards, M. M., &. Schairer, C. J. (2016). I want to be the Inquiry Guy! How Research Experiences for Teachers Change Beliefs, Attitudes, and Values About Teaching Science as Inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 27(2), 183-204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-016-9450-y.
Hutner, T. L., & Markman, A. B. (2016). Department-Level Representations: A New Approach to the Study of Science Teacher Cognition. Science Education, 100(1), 30-56. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21186.
Jerrim, J., Oliver, M., & Sims, S. (2019). The relationship between inquiry-based teaching and students’ achievement. New evidence from a longitudinal PISA study in England. Learning and Instruction, 61, 35-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.12.004.
Kawalkar, A., & Vijapurkar, J. (2013). Scaffolding Science Talk: The role of teachers’ questions in the inquiry classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 35(12), 2004-2027. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.604684.
Kirschner P. A., Sweller J., & Clark R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41, 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1.
Krämer, P., Nessler, S. H., & Schlüter, K. (2015). Teacher students’ dilemmas when teaching science through inquiry. Research in Science & Technological Education, 33(3), 325-343. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2015.1047446.
Lazonder, A. W., & Harmsen, R. (2016). Meta-Analysis of Inquiry-Based Learning Effects of Guidance. Review of Educational Research, 20(10), 1-38. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315627366.
Lebak, K. (2015). Unpacking the Complex Relationship Between Beliefs, Practice, and Change Related to Inquiry-Based Instruction of One Science Teacher. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 26(8), 695-713. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-015-9445-0.
Lederman, N. G., Lederman, J. S., & Antink, A. (2013). Nature of Science and Scientific Inquiry as Contexts for Learning of Science and Achievement of Scientific Literacy. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 1(3), 138-147.
Lee, E. A., & Brown, M. J. (2018). Connecting Inquiry and Values in Science Education. Science & Education, 27(1-2), 63-79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-017-9952-9.
Lievesley, T. (2014). What Does OFSTED Say? Primary Science, 133, 22-23.
Maaß, K., & Engeln, K. (2016). Report on the large-scale survey about inquiry-based learning and teaching in the European partner countries. EUproject mascil, Deliverable No 10.2.
McConney, A., Oliver, M. C., Woods-McConney, A., Schibeci, R., & Maor, D. (2014). Inquiry, Engagement, and Literacy in Science: A Retrospective, Cross-National Analysis Using PISA 2006. Science Education, 98(6), 963-980. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21135.
Minner, D. D., Levy, A. J., & Century, J. (2010). Inquiry-Based Science Instruction – What Is It and Does It Matter? Results from a Research Synthesis Years 1984 to 2002, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(4), 474-496. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20347.
National Research Council (2012). A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
OECD (2017). ‘PISA 2015 Science Framework’, in PISA 2015 Assessment and Analytical Framework: Science, Reading, Mathematic, Financial Literacy and Collaborative Problem Solving, OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264281820-3-en.
OFSTED (2013). Office for Standards in Education, Children’s Services and Skills. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/386795/Ofsted_Annual_Report_201213_Schools.pdf.
Önder, F., Şenyiğit, Ç., & Sılay, İ. (2018). Effect of an inquiry-based learning method on students’ misconceptions about charging of conducting and insulating bodies. European Journal of Physics, 39(5), 055702. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6404/aac52a.
Osborne, J. & Dillon, J. (2008). Science Education in Europe: Critical Reflections. Nuffield Foundation. Retrieved from http://www.nuffieldfoundation.org/sites/default/files/Sci_Ed_in_Europe_Report_Final.pdf.
Osborne, J. (2014). Teaching scientific practices: Meeting the challenge of change. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(2), 177-196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-014-9384-1.
Ozel, M., & Luft, J. (2013). Beginning Secondary Science Teachers’ Conceptualization and Enactment of Inquiry-Based Instruction. School Science and Mathematics, 113(6), 308-316. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12030.
Plomp, T. (2013). Educational design research: An Introduction. In Plomp, T. & Nieveen, N. (Eds.), Educational design research – Part A: An Introduction. Enschede, the Netherlands: SLO.
Rönnebeck, S., Bernholt, S., & Ropohl, M. (2016). Searching for a common ground – A literature review of empirical research on scientific inquiry activities. Studies in Science Education, 52(2), 161-197. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2016.1206351.
Schwarz, C. V., Gunckel, K. L., Smith, E. L., Covitt, B. A., Bae, M., Enfield, M., & Tsurusaki, B. K. (2008). Helping elementary preservice teachers learn to use curriculum materials for effective science teaching. Science Education, 92(2), 345-377. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20243.
van Uum, M. S. J., Verhoeff, R. P., & Peeters, M. (2016). Inquiry-based science education: towards a pedagogical framework for primary school teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 38(3), 450-469. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1147660.
Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., & Braaten, M. (2008). Beyond the scientific method: Model-based inquiry as a new paradigm of preference for school science investigations. Science Education, 92(5), 941-967. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20259.

How to cite this article

APA

Romero-Ariza, M., Quesada, A., Abril, A. M., Sorensen, P., & Oliver, M. C. (2020). Highly Recommended and Poorly Used: English and Spanish Science Teachers’ Views of Inquiry-based Learning (IBL) and its Enactment. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(1), em1793. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/109658

Vancouver

Romero-Ariza M, Quesada A, Abril AM, Sorensen P, Oliver MC. Highly Recommended and Poorly Used: English and Spanish Science Teachers’ Views of Inquiry-based Learning (IBL) and its Enactment. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2020;16(1):em1793. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/109658

AMA

Romero-Ariza M, Quesada A, Abril AM, Sorensen P, Oliver MC. Highly Recommended and Poorly Used: English and Spanish Science Teachers’ Views of Inquiry-based Learning (IBL) and its Enactment. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2020;16(1), em1793. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/109658

Chicago

Romero-Ariza, Marta, Antonio Quesada, Ana Maria Abril, Peter Sorensen, and Mary Colette Oliver. "Highly Recommended and Poorly Used: English and Spanish Science Teachers’ Views of Inquiry-based Learning (IBL) and its Enactment". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2020 16 no. 1 (2020): em1793. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/109658

Harvard

Romero-Ariza, M., Quesada, A., Abril, A. M., Sorensen, P., and Oliver, M. C. (2020). Highly Recommended and Poorly Used: English and Spanish Science Teachers’ Views of Inquiry-based Learning (IBL) and its Enactment. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(1), em1793. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/109658

MLA

Romero-Ariza, Marta et al. "Highly Recommended and Poorly Used: English and Spanish Science Teachers’ Views of Inquiry-based Learning (IBL) and its Enactment". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 16, no. 1, 2020, em1793. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/109658