Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

• Abdelrahman, R. M. (2020). Metacognitive awareness and academic motivation and their impact on academic achievement of Ajman University students. Heliyon, 6(9), e04192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04192
• Akturk, A. O., & Sahin, I. (2011). Literature review on metacognition and its measurement. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 3731-3736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.364
• Arroyo, I., Woolf, B. P., Burelson, W., Muldner, K., Rai, D., & Tai, M. (2014). A multimedia adaptive tutoring system for mathematics that addresses cognition, metacognition and affect. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 24(4), 387-426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-014-0023-y
• Artz, A. F., & Armour-Thomas, E. (1992). Development of a cognitive-metacognitive framework for protocol analysis of mathematical problem solving in small groups. Cognition and Instruction, 9(2), 137-175. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0902_3
• Baker, L. (1989). Metacognition, comprehension monitoring, and the adult reader. Educational Psychology Review, 1(1), 3-38. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01326548
• Baten, E., Praet, M., & Desoete, A. (2017). The relevance and efficacy of metacognition for instructional design in the domain of mathematics. ZDM, 49, 613-623. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0851-y
• Baumanns, L., & Rott, B. (2021). Developing a framework for characterizing problem-posing activities: A review. Research in Mathematics Education, 24(1), 28-50. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2021.1897036
• Brown, A. L. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more mysterious mechanisms. In F. Reiner, & R. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding (pp. 65-116). Lawrence Erlbaum.
• Brown, A. L., Bransford, J. D., Ferrara, R. A., & Campion, J. C. (1983). Learning, remembering, and understanding. In P. H. Mussen (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Formerly Carmichael’s manual of child psychology (pp. 420-494). Wiley.
• Brown, A. L., & Palincsar, A. S. (1982). Inducing strategic learning from texts by means of informed, self-control training. Technical report No. 262. https://s.net.vn/luYh
• Cao, Q.-T., Vuong, Q.-H., Pham, H.-H., Luong, D.-H., Ho, M.-T., Hoang, A.-D., & Do, M.-T. (2021). A Bibliometric review of research on international students’ mental health: Science mapping of the literature from 1957 to 2020. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 11(3), 781-794. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe11030056
• Cappello, M., & Lafferty, K. E. (2015). The roles of photography for developing literacy across the disciplines. The Reading Teacher, 69(3), 287-295. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1418
• Carlson, M. P., & Bloom, I. (2005). The cyclic nature of problem solving: An emergent multidimensional problem-solving framework. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 58(1), 45-75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-005-0808-x
• Carr, M., & Jessup, D. L. (1997). Gender differences in first-grade mathematics strategy use: Social and metacognitive influences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(2), 318-328. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.89.2.318
• De Clercq, A., Desoete, A., & Roeyers, H. (2000). Epa2000: A multilingual, programmable computer assessment of off-line metacognition in children with mathematical-learning disabilities. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 32, 304-311. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03207799
• Desoete, A. (2008). Multi-method assessment of metacognitive skills in elementary school children: How you test is what you get. Metacognition and Learning, 3(3), 189-206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-008-9026-0
• Desoete, A., & De Craene, B. (2019). Metacognition and mathematics education: An overview. ZDM, 51, 565-575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01060-w
• Desoete, A., Baten, E., Vercaemst, V., De Busschere, A., Baudonck, M., & Vanhaeke, J. (2019). Metacognition and motivation as predictors for mathematics performance of Belgian elementary school children. ZDM, 51, 667-677. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-01020-w
• Desoete, A., Roeyers, H., & Buysse, A. (2001). Metacognition and mathematical problem solving in grade 3. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34(5), 435-447. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221940103400505
• Dignath, C., & Büttner, G. (2018). Teachers’ direct and indirect promotion of self-regulated learning in primary and secondary school mathematics classes–Insights from video-based classroom observations and teacher interviews. Metacognition and Learning, 13, 127-157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-018-9181-x
• Do, T. T., Phan, T. T., Tran, T. H. G., Bui, M. D., Pham, T. O., Nguyen, L. V. A., & Nguyen, T.-T. (2021). Research on lifelong learning in Southeast Asia: A bibliometrics review between 1972 and 2019. Cogent Education, 8(1), 1994361. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2021.1994361
• Donker, A. S., de Boer, H., Kostons, D., Dignath van Ewijk, C. C., & van der Werf, M. P. C. (2014). Effectiveness of learning strategy instruction on academic performance: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 11, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.11.002
• Dunlosky, J., & Tauber, S. K. (2016). The Oxford handbook of metamemory. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199336746.001.0001
• Ernst, H. M., Wittwer, J., & Voss, T. (2023). Do they know what they know? Accuracy in teacher candidates’ self-assessments and its influencing factors. British Educational Research Journal, 49(4), 649-673. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3860
• Fernie, B. A., Kopar, U. Y., Fisher, P. L., & Spada, M. M. (2018). Further development and testing of the metacognitive model of procrastination: Self-reported academic performance. Journal of Affective Disorders, 240, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2018.07.018
• Flavell, J. H. (1971). First discussant’s comments: What is memory development the development of? Human Development, 14(4), 272-278. https://doi.org/10.1159/000271221
• Flavell, J. H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem-solving. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), The nature of intelligence (pp. 231-236). Erlbaum. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781032646527-16
• Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906-911. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906
• Flavell, J. H., Miller, P. H., & Miller, S. A. (2002). Cognitive development. Prentice-Hall.
• Fleur, D. S., Bredeweg, B., & van den Bos, W. (2021). Metacognition: Ideas and insights from neuro- and educational sciences. NPJ Science of Learning, 6, 13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-021-00089-5
• Foong, P. Y. (1990). A metacognitive-heuristic approach to mathematical problem solving [Unpublished doctoral thesis]. Monash University.
• Ghazal, S., Cokely, E. T., & Garcia-Retamero, R. (2014). Predicting biases in very highly educated samples: Numeracy and metacognition. Judgment and Decision Making, 9(1), 15–34. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1930297500004952
• Goos, M., Galbraith, P., & Renshaw, P. (2002). Socially mediated metacognition: Creating collaborative zones of proximal development in small group problem solving. Educational Studies in Mathematics. 49(2), 193-223. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3483075
• Gregg-Jolly, L., Swartz, J., Iverson, E., Stern, J., Brown, N., & Lopatto, D. (2016). Situating second-year success: Understanding second-year STEM experiences at a liberal arts college. CBE Life Sciences Education, 15(3), ar43. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-01-0044
• Griese, B., Lehmann, M., & Roesken-Winter, B. (2015). Refining questionnaire-based assessment of STEM students’ learning strategies. International Journal of STEM Education, 2, 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-015-0025-9
• Guo, L. (2020). Teachers’ mediation in students’ development of cognition and metacognition. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 50(5), 458-473. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866x.2020.1846158
• Hacker, D. J., Kiuhara, S. A., & Levin, J. R. (2019). A metacognitive intervention for teaching fractions to students with or at-risk for learning disabilities in mathematics. ZDM, 51(4), 601-612. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01040-0
• Hallinger, P., & Kovačević, J. (2019). A bibliometric review of research on educational administration: Science mapping the literature, 1960 to 2018. Review of Educational Research, 89(3), 335-369. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654319830380
• Hallinger, P., & Nguyen, V.-T. (2020). Mapping the landscape and structure of research on education for sustainable development: A bibliometric review. Sustainability, 12(5), 1947. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051947
• Hallinger, P., & Suriyankietkaew, S. (2018). Science mapping of the knowledge base on sustainable leadership, 1990-2018. Sustainability, 10(12), 4846. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124846
• Iiskala, T., Vauras, M., Lehtinen, E., & Salonen, P. (2011). Socially shared metacognition of dyads of pupils in collaborative mathematical problem-solving processes. Learning and Instruction, 21(3), 379-393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.05.002
• Jacobs, J., & Paris, S. (1987). Children’s metacognition about reading. Issues in definition, measurement, and instruction. Educational Psychologist, 22, 255-278. https://doi.ogr/10.1207/s15326985ep2203&4_4
• Jain, S., & Dowson, M. (2009). Mathematics anxiety as a function of multidimensional self-regulation and self-efficacy. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34(3), 240-249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2009.05.004
• Julius, R., Abd Halim, M. S., Abdul Hadi, N., Alias, A. N., Mohd Khalid, M. H., Mahfodz, Z., & Ramli, F. F. (2021). Bibliometric analysis of research in mathematics education using Scopus database. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(12), em2040. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11329
• Kazuhiro, O., & Tetsuya, H. (2018). Beyond intelligence: A meta-analytic review of the relationship among metacognition, intelligence, and academic performance. Metacognition and Learning, 13, 179-212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-018-9183-8
• Kloo, D., Osterhaus, C., Kristen-Antonow, S., & Sodian, B. (2022). The impact of theory of mind and executive function on math and reading abilities: A longitudinal study. Infant and Child Development, 31(6). https://doi.org/10.1002/icd.2356
• Kluwe, R. H. (1987). Executive decisions and regulation of problem solving behavior. In F. E. Weinert & R. H. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding (pp.31-64). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
• Kramarski, B., Mevarech, Z. R., & Arami, M. (2002). The effects of metacognitive instruction on solving mathematical authentic tasks. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 49(2), 225-250. https://www.jstor.org /stable/3483076
• Kuzle, A. (2018). Assessing metacognition of grade 2 and grade 4 students using an adaptation of multi-method interview approach during mathematics problem-solving. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 30, 185-207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-017-0227-1
• Lozano, S., Calzada-Infante, L., Adenso-Diaz, B., & Garcia, S. (2019). Complex network analysis of keywords co-occurrence in the recent efficiency analysis literature. Scientometrics, 120, 609-629. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03132-w
• Lucangeli, D., Fastame, M. C., Pedron, M., Porru, A., Duca, V., Hitchcott, P. K., & Penna, M. P. (2019). Metacognition and errors: The impact of self-regulatory trainings in children with specific learning disabilities. ZDM, 51(4), 577-585. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01044-w
• Merigó, J. M., Pedrycz, W., Weber, R., & de la Sotta, C. (2018). Fifty years of Information Sciences: A bibliometric overview. Information Sciences, 432, 245-268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2017.11.054
• Metcalfe, J., & Wiebe, D. (1987). Intuition in insight and noninsight problem solving. Memory & Cognition, 15, 238-246. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197722
• Mevarech, Z. R., & Kramarski, B. (1997). IMPROVE: A multidimensional method for teaching mathematics in heterogeneous classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 34(2), 365. https://doi.org/10.2307/1163362
• Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and metaanalyses: PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), Article e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
• Moulin, C., & Souchay, C. (2015). An active inference and epistemic value view of metacognition. Cognitive Neuroscience, 6(4), 221-222. https://doi.org/10.1080/17588928.2015.1051015
• Muncer, G., Higham, P. A., Gosling, C. J., Cortese, S., Wood-Downie, H., & Hadwin, J. A. (2021). A meta-analysis investigating the association between metacognition and math performance in adolescence. Educational Psychology Review, 34(1), 301-334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09620-x
• Nelson, T. O., & Narens, L. (1990). Metamemory: A theoretical framework and new findings. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 125-141). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60053-5
• Nguyen, C. H., Nguyen, L. T. M., Tran, T., & Nguyen, T. T. (2020). Bibliographic and content analysis of articles on education from Vietnam indexed in Scopus from 2009 to 2018. Science Editing, 7(1), 45-49. https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.188
• Nguyen, T.-T., Pham, H.-H., Nguyen-Le, V. A., Nguyen, C. H., & Tran, T. (2023). Review of research on predatory scientific publications from Scopus database between 2012 and 2022. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 54(2), 175-219. https://doi.org/10.3138/jsp-2022-0045
• Ohtani, K., & Hisasaka, T. (2018). Beyond intelligence: A meta-analytic review of the relationship among metacognition, intelligence, and academic performance. Metacognition and Learning, 13(2), 179-212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-018-9183-8
• Ozcan, Z. C., & Eren Gumus, A. (2019). A modeling study to explain mathematical problem-solving performance through metacognition, self-efficacy, motivation, and anxiety. Australian Journal of Education, 63(1), 116-134. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004944119840073
• Pham, D. B., Tran, T., Le, T. T. H., Nguyen, T. N., Cao, T. H., & Nguyen, T.-T. (2021). Research on Industry 4.0 and on key related technologies in Vietnam: A Bibliometric Analysis using Scopus. Learned Publishing, 34(3), 414-428. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1381
• Pham, D. B., Tran, T., Trinh, T. P. T., Nguyen, T.-T., Nguyen, N. T., & Le, T. T. H. (2020). A spike in the scientific output on social sciences in Vietnam for recent three years: Evidence from bibliometric analysis in Scopus database (2000-2019). Journal of Information Science, 48(5), 623-639. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551520977447
• Pham, H. T., Vu, T. C., Nguyen, L. T., Vu, N.-T. T., Nguyen, T. C., Pham, H.-H. T., Lai, L. P., Le, H.-C. T., & Ngo, C. H. (2023). Professional development for science teachers: A bibliometric analysis from 2001 to 2021. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(5), em2260. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13153
• Pham, P. T., Lien, D. T. H., Kien, H. C., Chi, N. H., Tinh, P. T., Do, T., Nguyen, L. C., & Nguyen, T.-T. (2022). Learning management system in developing countries: A bibliometric analysis between 2005 and 2020. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(3), 1363-1377. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.3.1363
• Phan, T. T., Do, T. T.an, Trinh, T. H., Tran, T., Duong, H. T., Trinh, T. P. T., Do, B. C., & Nguyen, T.-T. (2022). A bibliometric review on realistic mathematics education in Scopus database between 1972-2019. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(2), 1133-1149. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.2.1133
• Phang, F. A. (2010). Patterns of physics problem-solving and metacognition among secondary school students: A comparative study between the UK and Malaysian cases. The International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences: Annual Review, 5(8), 309-324. https://doi.org/10.18848/1833-1882/cgp/v05i08/51816
• Pradhan, S., & Das, P. (2021). Influence of metacognition on academic achievement and learning style of undergraduate students in Tezpur University. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(1), 381-391. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.10.1.381
• Promentilla, M., Aviso, K., & Lucas, R. (2016). Understanding chemical engineering student’s learning of process systems engineering from metacognitive perspectives. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 52, 697-702. https://doi.org/10.3303/CET1652117
• Proust, J. (2010). Metacognition. Philosophy Compass, 5(11), 989-998. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2010.00340.x
• Roll, I., Aleven, V., McLaren, B. M., & Koedinger, K. R. (2007). Designing for metacognition–Applying cognitive tutor principles to the tutoring of help seeking. Metacognition and Learning, 2(2-3), 125-140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-007-9010-0
• Schmitz, A., & Karstens, F. (2022). Lesestrategien zur Unterstützung des Verstehens von Textaufgaben. Vermittlung und Routinen im Mathematikunterricht aus Sicht von Lehrkräften und Lernenden [Reading strategies to support comprehension of word problems. Communication and routines in mathematics lessons from the perspective of teachers and learners]. Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik [Journal for Mathematics Didactics], 43, 255-279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13138-021-00188-1
• Schneider, W., & Artelt, C. (2010). Metacognition and mathematics education. ZDM, 42, 149-161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s1185 8-010-0240-2
• Schoenfeld, A. H. (1983a). Beyond the purely cognitive: Belief systems, social cognitions, and metacognitions as driving forces in intellectual performance. Cognitive Science, 7(4), 329-363. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0364-0213(83)80003-2
• Schoenfeld, A. H. (1983b). Episodes and executive decisions’ in mathematical problem solving. In R. Lesh, & M. Landau (Eds.), Acquisition of mathematics concepts and processes (pp. 345-395). Academic Press.
• Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Making sense of ‘‘outloud’’ problem solving protocols. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 4(2), 171-191.
• Schoenfeld, A. H. (1987). What’s the fuss about metacognition? In A. Schoenfeld (Ed.), Cognitive science and mathematics education (pp. 189-215). Erlbaum.
• Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense-making in mathematics. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook for research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 334-370). MacMillan.
• Schraw, G. (1998). Promoting general metacognitive awareness. Instructional Science, 26(1), 113-125. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003044231033
• Schraw, G., & Moshman, D. (1995). Metacognitive theories. Educational Psychology Review, 7(4), 351-371. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02212307
• Sevgi, S., & Caglikose, M. (2020). Analyzing sixth-grade students’ metacognition skills in process of solving fraction problems. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 35(3), 662-687. https://doi.org/10.16986/HUJE.2019053981
• Shen, J. L., & Chen, Y. H. (2014). Handbook of research instruments of educational psychology in China. Higher Education Press.
• Shilo, A., & Kramarski, B. (2019). Mathematical-metacognitive discourse: How can it be developed among teachers and their students? Empirical evidence from a videotaped lesson and two case studies. ZDM, 51(4), 625-640. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-01016-6
• Stillman, G., & Mevarech, Z. (2010). Metacognition research in mathematics education: From hot topic to mature field. ZDM, 42(2), 145-148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-010-0245-x
• Tobias S., & Everson H.T. (1995). Development and validation of an objectively scored measure of metacognition [Paper presentation]. The Annual Meeting of the American Education Research Association.
• Tobias, S., & Everson, H. T. (1999). Towards a performance based measure of metacognitive knowledge monitoring: Relationships with self-reports and behavior ratings [Paper presentation]. The Symposium Entitled Research on Metacognitive Monitoring Held at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting.
• Tobias, S., & Everson, H. T. (2002). Knowing what you know and what you don’t: Further research on metacognitive knowledge monitoring. https://cft.vanderbilt.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/59/knowing-what-you-know-what-what-you-don-further-research-metacognitive.pdf
• Trinh, T. P. T., Tran, T., Le, T. T. H., Nguyen, T.-T., & Pham, H. H. (2020). Factors impacting international-indexed publishing among Vietnamese educational researchers. Learned Publishing, 33(4), 419-429. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1323
• Veenman, M. V. J. (2006). The role of intellectual and metacognitive skills in math problem solving. In A. Desoete, & M. Veenman (Eds.), Metacogniton in mathematics education (pp. 35-50). Nova Science.
• Veenman, M. V. J., Kok, R., & Blöte, A. W. (2005). The relation between intellectual and metacognitive skills in early adolescence. Instructional Science, 33(3), 193-211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-004-2274-8
• Veenman, M. V. J., & Spaans, M. A. (2005). Relation between intellectual and metacognitive skills: Age and task differences. Learning and Individual Differences, 15(2), 159-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2004.12.001
• Vorhölter, K. (2019). Enhancing metacognitive group strategies for modelling. ZDM, 51, 703-716. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01055-7
• Wall, K. (2008). Understanding metacognition through the use of pupil views templates: Pupil views of learning to learn. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 3(1), 23-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2008.03.004
• Wang, M., Zepeda, C. D., Qin, X., Del Toro, J., & Binning, K. R. (2021). More than growth mindset: Individual and interactive links among socioeconomically disadvantaged adolescents’ ability mindsets, metacognitive skills, and math engagement. Child Development, 92(5), e957-e976. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13560
• Wang, P., Zhu, F., Song, H., & Hou, J. (2017). A bibliometric profile of current science between 1961 and 2015. Current Science, 113(3), 386-392. https://doi.org/10.18520/cs/v113/i03/386-392
• Wonjoon, H., Matthew, L. B., & Harsha, N. P. (2020). A latent profile analysis of undergraduates’ achievement motivations and metacognitive behaviors, and their relations to achievement in science. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112, 1409-1430. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000445
• Xue, X., Wang, Y., Li, H., Gao, J., & Si, J. (2023). The association between mathematical attitudes, academic procrastination and mathematical achievement among primary school students: The moderating effect of mathematical metacognition. Current Psychology, 42, 7953–7964. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-02133-4
• Zhan, Z., Shen, W., Xu, Z., Niu, S., & You, G. (2022). A bibliometric analysis of the global landscape on STEM education (2004-2021): Towards global distribution, subject integration, and research trends. Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 16(2), 171-203. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJIE-08-2022-0090
• Zhang, J., Huang, B. J., Si, J. W., & Guan, D. X. (2018). Relationship between math anxiety and mathematical achievement in township pupils: The chain mediating roles of mathematical self-efficacy and metacognition. Psychological Development and Education, 34(4), 453–460
• Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2014). Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629

APA

Thi-Nga, H., Thi-Binh, V., & Nguyen, T.-T. (2024). Metacognition in mathematics education: From academic chronicle to future research scenario–A bibliometric analysis with the Scopus database. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(4), em2427. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14381

Vancouver

Thi-Nga H, Thi-Binh V, Nguyen TT. Metacognition in mathematics education: From academic chronicle to future research scenario–A bibliometric analysis with the Scopus database. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2024;20(4):em2427. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14381

AMA

Thi-Nga H, Thi-Binh V, Nguyen TT. Metacognition in mathematics education: From academic chronicle to future research scenario–A bibliometric analysis with the Scopus database. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2024;20(4), em2427. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14381

Chicago

Thi-Nga, Hoang, Vu Thi-Binh, and Tien-Trung Nguyen. "Metacognition in mathematics education: From academic chronicle to future research scenario–A bibliometric analysis with the Scopus database". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2024 20 no. 4 (2024): em2427. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14381

Harvard

Thi-Nga, H., Thi-Binh, V., and Nguyen, T.-T. (2024). Metacognition in mathematics education: From academic chronicle to future research scenario–A bibliometric analysis with the Scopus database. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(4), em2427. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14381

MLA

Thi-Nga, Hoang et al. "Metacognition in mathematics education: From academic chronicle to future research scenario–A bibliometric analysis with the Scopus database". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 20, no. 4, 2024, em2427. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14381