Unlocking the secrets of students’ mathematical literacy to solve mathematical problems: A systematic literature review
Full Text (PDF)
Lukman Hakim Muhaimin 1 2 * , Rizqi Amaliyakh Sholikhakh 1 3 , Sri Yulianti 1 4 , Ardani 5 , Agus Hendriyanto 1 2 , Sani Sahara 1 2
More Detail
1 Department of Mathematics Education, Faculty of Mathematics and Science Education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, INDONESIA2 Indonesian DDR Development Center (PUSBANGDDRINDO), PUI-PT Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, INDONESIA3 Department of Mathematics Education, Universitas Pancasakti Tegal, Tegal, INDONESIA4 Universitas Islam Ogan Komering Ilir Kayuagung, Kayuagung, INDONESIA5 Department of Mathematics Education, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Science, Yogyakarta State University, Yogyakarta, INDONESIA* Corresponding Author
Abstract
Mathematical literacy is the ability to use mathematical knowledge in real-life situations, making it an essential component of education because of its importance in solving everyday problems. Mathematical literacy is also part of the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) global assessment. Because of the importance of the subject, this Systematic Literature Review (SLR) investigated the relationship between students’ mathematical literacy and their ability to solve mathematical problems. This SLR uses the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) approach was used, and articles published from January 2013 to August 2023 were obtained from databases including ERIC (342), ProQuest (1,329), and Scopus (27). Following PRISMA, a total of 20 articles were included in the review. Of the 20 articles, most were conducted on junior high school students in Turkey. The majority of reviewed studies found students to have a low level of mathematical literacy, which caused difficulties in formulating problems. The examined studies also revealed several internal and external factors affecting mathematical literacy. Problems used by PISA were the most frequently employed to measure students’ mathematical literacy in the reviewed studies.
License
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Article Type: Review Article
EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed, 2024, Volume 20, Issue 4, Article No: em2428
https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14404
Publication date: 01 Apr 2024
Online publication date: 25 Mar 2024
Article Views: 660
Article Downloads: 419
Open Access References How to cite this articleReferences
- Abdullah, A. H., Abidin, N. L. Z., & Ali, M. (2015). Analysis of students’ errors in solving higher order thinking skills (HOTS) problems for the topic of fraction. Asian Social Science, 11(21), 133-142. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v11n21p133
- Afni, N., & Hartono. (2020). Contextual teaching and learning (CTL) as a strategy to improve students mathematical literacy. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1581, 012043. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1581/1/012043
- Aisyah, A., & Juandi, D. (2022). The description of Indonesian student mathematics literacy in the last decade. International Journal of Trends in Mathematics Education Research, 5(1), 105-110. https://doi.org/10.33122/ijtmer.v5i1.114
- Aksu, G., & Guzeller, C. O. (2016). Classification of PISA 2012 mathematical literacy scores using decision-tree method: Turkey sampling. Eğitim ve Bilim [Education and Science], 41(185), 101-122. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2016.4766
- Aksu, G., Guzeller, C. O., & Eser, M. T. (2017). Analysis of maths literacy performances of students with hierarchical linear modeling (HLM): The case of PISA 2012 Turkey. Eğitim ve Bilim [Education and Science], 42(191), 247-266. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2017.6956
- Almarashdi, H. S., & Jarrah, A. M. (2023). Assessing tenth-grade students’ mathematical literacy skills in solving PISA problems. Social Sciences, 12(1), 33. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12010033
- Altun, M. (2017). A new classification proposal for mathematical literacy problems. Education and Science, 42(190), 171-188. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2017.6916
- Astuti, P. (2018). Mathematical literacy ability and higher-order thinking ability. Proceedings of the National Mathematics Seminar, 1(1), 263-268. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/prisma/article/view/19599
- Bandura, A., & Watts, R. E. (1996). Self-efficacy in changing societies. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.1891/0889-8391.10.4.313
- Botha, H., Maree, J., & Stols, G. (2013). Mathematical literacy teachers: Can anyone be one? Perspectives in Education, 31(4), 180-194. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC151335
- Canbazoglu, H. B., & Tarim, K. (2020). An activity-based practice for improving mathematical literacy and awareness of elementary school teacher candidates. Pegem Eğitim ve Öğretim Dergisi [Pegem Journal of Education and Training], 10(4), 1183-1218. https://doi.org/10.14527/pegegog.2020.036
- Christiansen, I. M. (2007). Mathematical literacy as a school subject: Mathematical gaze or livelihood gaze? African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(1), 91-105. https://doi.org/10.1080/10288457.2007.10740614
- D’Ambrósio, U. (2005). Society, culture, mathematics and its teaching. Educação e Pesquisa [Education and Research], 31(1), 99-120. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-97022005000100008
- Dewantara, A. H., Zulkardi, & Darmawijoyo. (2015). Assessing seventh graders’ mathematical literacy in solving PISA-like tasks. Journal on Mathematics Education, 6(2), 39-49. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.6.2.2163.117-128
- Dwijayani, N. M. (2019). Development of circle learning media to improve student learning outcomes. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1321, 022099. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1321/2/022099
- Edgar, D. (1970). The cone of experience. Theory into Practice, 9(2), 96-100. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405847009542260
- English, L. D. (1996). Children’s construction of mathematical knowledge in solving novel isomorphic problems in concrete and written form. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 15(1), 81-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-3123(96)90042-5
- Fauzi, I., & Chano, J. (2022). Online learning: How does it impact on students’ mathematical literacy in elementary school? Journal of Education and Learning, 11(4), 220. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v11n4p220
- Fenanlampir, A., Batlolona, J. R., & Imelda, I. (2019). The struggle of Indonesian students in the context of TIMSS and PISA has not ended. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 10(2), 393-406. https://iaeme.com/Home/article_id/IJCIET_10_02_042
- Firdaus, F. M., & Herman, T. (2017). Improving primary students ‘ mathematical literacy through problem based learning and direct instruction. Educational Research and Reviews, 12(4), 212-219. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2016.3072
- Genc, M., & Erbas, A. K. (2019). Secondary mathematics teachers’ conceptions of mathematical literacy. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 7(3), 222-237. https://ijemst.org/index.php/ijemst/article/view/611
- Gou, J., Yu, B., Maybank, S. J., & Tao, D. (2021). Knowledge distillation: A survey. International Journal of Computer Vision, 129(6), 1789-1819. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11263-021-01453-z
- Haara, F. O. (2018). Pedagogical entrepreneurship in school mathematics: An approach for students’ development of mathematical literacy. International Journal for Mathematics Teaching and Learning, 19(2), 253-268. https://doi.org/10.4256/ijmtl.v19i2.95
- Haara, F. O., Bolstad, O. H., & Jenssen, E. S. (2021). Research on mathematical literacy in schools–Aim, approach and attention. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5(3), 285-313. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/9512
- Handayani, M., Perdana, N. S., & Ukhlumudin, I. (2021). Readiness of teachers and students to take minimum competency assessments. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Educational Assessment and Policy (pp. 73-79). https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210423.067
- Heckhausen, J., & Heckhausen, H. (2018). Motivation and action. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65094-4
- Herman, Shara, A. M., Silalahi, T. F., Sherly, & Julyanthry. (2022). Teachers’ attitude towards minimum competency assessment at Sultan Agung Senior High School in Pematangsiantar, Indonesia. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 11(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v11n2p1
- Hilbert, D. (1984). Mathematical problems. Taylor & Francis.
- Hutchison, D., & Schagen, I. (2007). Comparisons between PISA and TIMSS-are we the man with two watches? In T. Loveless (Ed.), Lessons learned: What international assessments tell us about math achievement. Brookings Institution Press.
- Hwang, J., & Ham, Y. (2021). Relationship between mathematical literacy and opportunity to learn with different types of mathematical tasks. Journal on Mathematics Education, 12(2), 199-222. https://doi.org/10.22342/JME.12.2.13625.199-222
- Hwang, W. Y., Chen, N. S., Dung, J. J., & Yang, Y. L. (2007). Multiple representation skills and creativity effects on mathematical problem solving using a multimedia whiteboard system. Educational Technology and Society, 10(2), 191-212. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.10.2.191
- Ishartono, N., Desstya, A., Prayitno, H. J., & Sidiq, Y. (2021). The quality of HOTS-based science questions developed by Indonesian elementary school teachers. Journal of Education Technology, 5(2), 236-245. https://doi.org/10.23887/jet.v5i2.33813
- Jablonka, E. (2003). Mathematical literacy. Mathematics Teacher: Learning and Teaching PK-12, 113(4), 262-263. https://doi.org/10.5951/mtlt.2019.0397
- Jailani, J., Retnawati, H., Wulandari, N. F., & Djidu, H. (2020). Mathematical literacy proficiency development based on content, context, and process. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 78(1), 80-101. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/20.78.80
- Juandi, D., & Hidayati, U. (2022). A systematics literature review: The impact of ICT on students. Jurnal Absis: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan Matematika [Abssis Journal: Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education], 5(1), 630-640. https://doi.org/10.30606/absis.v5i1.1671
- Kastberg, D., Chan, J., Murray, G., & Gonzales, P. (2015). Performance of U.S. 15-year-old students in science, reading, and mathematics literacy in an international context. National Center for Education Statistics.
- Kemendikbud. (2013). List of elementary schools based on the number of SD/MI national examination scores for the 2012/2013 academic year. Pemerintah Sleman. https://dokumen.tips/documents/ranking-sekolah-di-sleman.html?page=1
- Kholid, M. N., Rofi’ah, F., Ishartono, N., Waluyo, M., Maharani, S., Swastika, A., Faiziyah, N., & Sari, C. K. (2022). What are students’ difficulties in implementing mathematical literacy skills for solving PISA-like problem? Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 22(2), 181-200. https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v22i2.5057
- Kolar, V. M., & Hodnik, T. (2021). Mathematical literacy from the perspective of solving contextual problems. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(1), 467-483. https://doi.org/10.12973/EU-JER.10.1.467
- Kozakli Ulger, T., Bozkurt, I., & Altun, M. (2022). Analyzing in-service teachers’ process of mathematical literacy problem posing. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 17(3), em0687. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/11985
- Krathwohl, D. R. (2008). A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: An overview. ReVision, 41(4), 212-218. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2
- Kurniawati, N. D. L., & Mahmudi, A. (2019). Analysis of mathematical literacy skills and mathematics self-efficacy of junior high school students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1320, 012053. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1320/1/012053
- Kusuma, D., Sukestiyarno, Y. L., Wardono, & Cahyono, A. N. (2022). The characteristics of mathematical literacy based on students’ executive function. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(1), 193-206. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.1.193
- Lailiyah, S. (2017). Mathematical literacy skills of students’ in term of gender differences. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1868, 050019. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4995146
- Lara-Porras, A. M., Rueda-García, M. D. M., & Molina-Muñoz, D. (2019). Identifying the factors influencing mathematical literacy in several Spanish regions. South African Journal of Education, 39(2), S1-S13. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v39ns2a1630
- Laurens, T., Batlolona, F. A., Batlolona, J. R., & Leasa, M. (2018). How does realistic mathematics education (RME) improve students’ mathematics cognitive achievement? EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(2), 569-578. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/76959
- Li, H., Pang, H., & Hu, Z. (2018). Chinese language teacher competency: A literature review for a study series. Chinese Language Teaching Methodology and Technology, 1(4), 59-67. https://engagedscholar ship.csuohio.edu/cltmt/vol1/iss4/7
- Marchis, I. (2012). Non-routine problems in primary mathematics. Acta Didactica Napocensia [Napocensia Didactic Act], 5(3), 49-56.
- Martin, M. O., & Mullis, I. V. (2019). TIMSS assessment frameworks. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center.
- Maryani, N., & Widjajanti, D. B. (2020). Mathematical literacy: How to improve it using contextual teaching and learning method? Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1581, 012044. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1581/1/012044
- Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı [Ministry of Education]. (2013). Ulaştırma hizmetleri alanı kara yolu taşımacılığı [Transportation services field road transportation]. MEB Publication.
- Ministry of Education. (2020). AKM and its implications for learning. Center for Assessment and Learning, Research and Development and Bookkeeping Agency.
- Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Academia and clinic annals of internal medicine preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151(4), 264-269. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135
- Muhaimin, L. H., & Kholid, M. N. (2023). Pupils’ mathematical literacy hierarchy dimension for solving the minimum competency assessment. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2727, 020091. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0141406
- Muhaimin, L. H., Kusumah, Y. S., Juandi, D., Hendriyanto, A., & Sahara, S. (2023). The role of augmented reality-based media for enhancing students’ mathematical ability: A systematics literature review. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2909, 070001. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0182121
- Munroe, L. (2015). The open-ended approach framework. European Journal of Educational Research, 4(3), 97-104. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.4.3.97
- Nail-Chiwetalu, B. J., & Ratner, N. B. (2019). Information literacy for candidates. Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 37, 157-167. https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461(2006/018)
- National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (1986). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. NCTM.
- Nurmasari, L., Nurkamto, J., & Ramli, M. (2023). Mathematical literacy in primary schools: A systematic literature review. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2540, 070011. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0105855
- OECD. (2015). PISA 2015 assessment and analytical framework. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/pisa-2015-assessment-and-analytical-framework_9789264281820-en
- OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 results. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/Combined_Executive_Summaries_PISA_2018.pdf
- OECD. (2021). PISA 2021 mathematics framework. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/sitedocument/PISA-2021-mathematics-framework.pdf
- OECD. (2023). Program for international student assessment. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/
- Ozgen, K. (2019). Problem-posing skills for mathematical literacy: The sample of teachers and pre-service teachers. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 2019(84), 179-214. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2019.84.9
- Ozkale, A., & Ozdemir Erdogan, E. (2022). An analysis of the interaction between mathematical literacy and financial literacy in PISA. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 53(8), 1983-2003. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2020.1842526
- Pantziara, M., Gagatsis, A., & Elia, I. (2009). Using diagrams as tools for the solution of non-routine mathematical problems. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 72(1), 39-60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-009-9181-5
- Piaget, J. (1972). Cognitive development in children. British Journal of Educational Studies, 20(2), 238. https://doi.org/10.2307/3120240
- Poeck, K. Van, Lysgaard, J. A., & Reid, A. (2018). Environmental and sustainability education policy. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203732359
- Polk, J. A. (2006). Traits of effective teachers. Arts Education Policy Review, 107(4), 23-29. https://doi.org/10.3200/AEPR.107.4.23-29
- Pratama, M. A. (2020). Mathematical critical thinking ability and students’ confidence in mathematical literacy. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1663, 012028. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1663/1/012028
- Puspitarini, Y. D., & Hanif, M. (2019). Using learning media to increase learning motivation in elementary school. Anatolian Journal of Education, 4(2), 53-60. https://doi.org/10.29333/aje.2019.426a
- Rahayu, D. U., Mulyono, M., & Cahyono, A. N. (2021). Mathematical literacy reviewed from the student’s cognitive style in the problem based learning learning model assisted by the learning management system. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 10(2), 171-179. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/ujmer/article/view/47948
- Rosa, M., & Orey, D. C. (2015). A trivium curriculum for mathematics based on literacy, matheracy, and technoracy: An ethnomathematics perspective. ZDM Mathematics Education, 47(4), 587-598. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0688-1
- Rosidin, U., Suyatna, A., & Abdurrahman, A. (2019). A combined HOTS-based assessment/STEM learning model to improve secondary students’ thinking skills: A development and evaluation study. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(3), 435-448. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.518464
- Rum, A. M., & Juandi, D. (2022). Students’ mathematical literacy: Systematic literature review (SLR). Journal of Mathematical Society, 4(2), 148-164. https://doi.org/10.18326/hipotenusa.v4i2.8111
- Saputri, P., Mardiana, M., & Triyanto, T. (2018). An analysis of student’s mathematical literacy ability of junior high school students. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Teacher Training and Education 2018 (pp. 185-189). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/ictte-18.2018.32
- Schleicher, A. (2018). PISA 2018: Insights and interpretations. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/publications/pisa-2018-results.htm
- Schoenfeld, A. H. (1988). When good teaching leads to bad results: The disasters of “well-taught” mathematics courses. Educational Psychologist, 23(2), 145-166. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2302_5
- Shara, A. M., Andriani, D., Ningsih, A. W., & Shinoda, K. (2020). Correlating reading literacy and writing literacy in Junior High School Pematangsiantar. Journal of English Education, 5(2), 72-85. https://doi.org/10.31327/jee.v5i2.1249
- She, H. C., Stacey, K., & Schmidt, W. H. (2018). Science and mathematics literacy: PISA for better school education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-9911-1
- Silver, E. A. (1985). Teaching and learning mathematical problem solving. Routledge.
- Stacey, K. (2011). The PISA view of mathematical literacy in Indonesia. Journal on Mathematics Education, 2(2), 95-126. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.2.2.746.95-126
- Stacey, K. (2015). The international assessment of mathematical literacy: PISA 2012 framework and items. In S. Cho (Ed.), Proceedings of the 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education (pp. 771-790). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17187-6
- Stacey, K., & Turner, R. (2015). Assessing mathematical literacy. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10121-7
- Suharta, I. G. P., & Suarjana, I. M. (2018). A case study on mathematical literacy of prospective elementary school teachers. International Journal of Instruction, 11(2), 413-424. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11228a
- Sumirattana, S., Makanong, A., & Thipkong, S. (2017). Using realistic mathematics education and the DAPIC problem-solving process to enhance secondary school students’ mathematical literacy. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 38(3), 307-315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2016.06.001
- Surya, Y. F., Zulfah, Astuti, Marta, R., & Wijaya, T. T. (2020). The development of open-ended math questions on grade V students of elementary school. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1613, 012081. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1613/1/012081
- Syafryadin, Harahap, A., Haryani, & Astrid, A. (2021). Boosting classroom interaction based on higher order thinking skills ( HOTS ) in English learning for beginners. International Journal of Language Education, 5(1), 477-489. https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v5i1.15211
- Tanujaya, B., Mumu, J., & Margono, G. (2017). The Relationship between higher order thinking skills and academic performance of student in mathematics instruction. International Education Studies, 10(11), 78. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v10n11p78
- Tapan Broutin, M. S., Kaleli Yılmaz, G., Bayram, G. M., & Ada, K. (2021). Investigation of documentation processes of students with low and high level of mathematical literacy: A case study. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 5(4), 189-213. https://doi.org/10.33902/jpr.2021474615
- Umbara, U., & Suryadi, D. (2019). Re-interpretation of mathematical literacy based on the teacher’s perspective. International Journal of Instruction, 12(4), 789-806. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12450a
- Vasquez, V. M. (2014). Negotiating critical literacies with young children. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315848624
- Warniatun, & Junaedi, I. (2019). Mathematical literacy ability of 8 th graders in problem based learning with think talk write approach. Unnes Journal of Mathematics, 9(2), 129-139. https://doi.org/10.15294/ujme.v9i2.32421
- WEF. (2015). New vision for education unlocking the potential of technology. World Economic Forum. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4938795
- Wery, J., & Thomson, M. M. (2013). Motivational strategies to enhance effective learning in teaching struggling students. Support for Learning, 28(3), 103-108. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9604.12027
- Widana, I. W., Suarta, I. M., & Citrawan, I. W. (2019). Application of Simpang Tegar method: Using data comparison. Journal of Advanced Research in Dynamical and Control System, 11(2 Special Issue), 1825-1832. https://www.jardcs.org/abstract.php?id=1563
- Widjaja, W. (2013). The use of contextual problems to support mathematical learning. Journal on Mathematics Education, 4(2), 151-159. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.4.2.413.151-159
- Widodo, S. A., Darhim, D., & Ikhwanudin, T. (2018). Improving mathematical problem solving skills through visual media. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 948, 012004. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/948/1/012004
- Wijaya, A. (2016). Students’ information literacy: A perspective from mathematical literacy. Journal on Mathematics Education, 7(2), 73-82. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.7.2.3532.73-82
- Wijaya, A., van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., Doorman, M., & Robitzsch, A. (2014). Difficulties in solving context-based PISA mathematics tasks: An analysis of students’ errors. Mathematics Enthusiast, 11(3), 555-584. https://doi.org/10.54870/1551-3440.1317
- Yenmez, A., & Gokce, S. (2023). Investigating the role of modeling practices on mathematical literacy. Bartin University Journal of Faculty of Education, 12(1), 180-189. https://doi.org/10.14686/buefad.1027353
- Yuliati, Y. (2017). View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendas [Cakrawala Pendas Journal], 3(2), 21-28. https://doi.org/10.31949/jcp.v3i2.592
- Zahra, S. A., Wright, M., & Abdelgawad, S. G. (2014). Contextualization and the advancement of entrepreneurship research. International Small Business Journal, 32(5), 479-500. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242613519807
- Zainiyah, U., & Marsigit, M. (2019). Improving mathematical literacy of problem solving at the 5th grade of primary students. Journal of Education and Learning, 13(1), 98-103. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v13i1.11519
How to cite this article
APA
Muhaimin, L. H., Sholikhakh, R. A., Yulianti, S., Ardani, Hendriyanto, A., & Sahara, S. (2024). Unlocking the secrets of students’ mathematical literacy to solve mathematical problems: A systematic literature review. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(4), em2428. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14404
Vancouver
Muhaimin LH, Sholikhakh RA, Yulianti S, Ardani, Hendriyanto A, Sahara S. Unlocking the secrets of students’ mathematical literacy to solve mathematical problems: A systematic literature review. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2024;20(4):em2428. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14404
AMA
Muhaimin LH, Sholikhakh RA, Yulianti S, Ardani, Hendriyanto A, Sahara S. Unlocking the secrets of students’ mathematical literacy to solve mathematical problems: A systematic literature review. EURASIA J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2024;20(4), em2428. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14404
Chicago
Muhaimin, Lukman Hakim, Rizqi Amaliyakh Sholikhakh, Sri Yulianti, Ardani, Agus Hendriyanto, and Sani Sahara. "Unlocking the secrets of students’ mathematical literacy to solve mathematical problems: A systematic literature review". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2024 20 no. 4 (2024): em2428. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14404
Harvard
Muhaimin, L. H., Sholikhakh, R. A., Yulianti, S., Ardani, Hendriyanto, A., and Sahara, S. (2024). Unlocking the secrets of students’ mathematical literacy to solve mathematical problems: A systematic literature review. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(4), em2428. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14404
MLA
Muhaimin, Lukman Hakim et al. "Unlocking the secrets of students’ mathematical literacy to solve mathematical problems: A systematic literature review". Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 20, no. 4, 2024, em2428. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14404